Reproductive tradeoff limits the predatory efficiency of female Arizona Bark Scorpions (Centruroides sculpturatus)
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Michael M Webber (1)
    Javier A Rodríguez-Robles (1)
  • 关键词:Cost of reproduction ; Foraging ; Life history tradeoff ; Maternal care ; Predatory efficiency
  • 刊名:BMC Evolutionary Biology
  • 出版年:2013
  • 出版时间:December 2013
  • 年:2013
  • 卷:13
  • 期:1
  • 全文大小:250 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Formanowicz DR Jr, Shaffer LR: Reproductive investment in the scorpion Centruroides vittatus . / Oecologia 1993, 94:368-72. CrossRef
    2. Aubret F, Bonnet X, Shine R, Lourdais O: Fat is sexy for females but not males: the influence of body reserves on reproduction in snakes ( Vipera aspis ). / Horm Behav 2002, 42:135-47. CrossRef
    3. Hanssen SA, Hasselquist D, Folstad I, Erikstad KE: Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction. / Proc R Soc B 2005, 272:1039-046. CrossRef
    4. Fisher DO, Blomberg SP: Costs of reproduction and terminal investment by females in a semelparous marsupial. / PLoS One 2011. 6e15226
    5. Charland MB: Thermal consequences of reptilian viviparity: thermoregulation in gravid and non-gravid garter snakes ( Thamnophis ). / J Herpetol 1995, 29:383-90. CrossRef
    6. Shaffer LR, Formanowicz DR Jr: A cost of viviparity and parental care in scorpions: reduced sprint speed and behavioural compensation. / Anim Behav 1996, 51:1017-024. CrossRef
    7. Bleu J, Le Galliard JF, Fitze PS, Meylan S, Clobert J, Massot M: Reproductive allocation strategies: a long-term study on proximate factors and temporal adjustments in a viviparous lizard. / Oecologia 2013, 171:141-51. CrossRef
    8. Beuchat CA, Vleck D: Metabolic consequences of viviparity in a lizard, Sceloporus jarrovii . / Physiol Zool 1990, 63:555-70.
    9. Schultz TJ, Webb JK, Christian KA: The physiological cost of pregnancy in a tropical viviparous snake. / Copeia 2008, 2008:637-42. CrossRef
    10. Pruitt JN, Troupe JE: The effect of reproductive status and situation on locomotor performance and anti-predator strategies in a funnel-web spider. / J Zool 2010, 281:39-5. CrossRef
    11. Altmann J, Samuels A: Costs of maternal care: infant-carrying in baboons. / Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1992, 29:391-98. CrossRef
    12. Hunt J, Simmons LW, Kotiaho JS: A cost of maternal care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus ? / J Evol Biol 2002, 15:57-4. CrossRef
    13. Christe P, Glaizot O, Strepparava N, Devevey G, Fumagalli L: Twofold cost of reproduction: an increase in parental effort leads to higher malarial parasitaemia and to a decrease in resistance to oxidative stress. / Proc R Soc B 2012, 279:1142-149. CrossRef
    14. Cooper WE Jr, Vitt LJ, Hedges R, Huey RB: Locomotor impairment and defense in gravid lizards ( Eumeces laticeps ): behavioral shift in activity may offset costs of reproduction in an active forager. / Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1990, 27:153-57. CrossRef
    15. Reznick D, Yang AP: The influence of fluctuating resources on life history: Patterns of allocation and plasticity in female guppies. / Ecology 1993, 74:2011-019. CrossRef
    16. Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT: Selfish mothers: reproductive expenditure and resource availability in bighorn ewes. / Behav Ecol 1998, 9:144-50. CrossRef
    17. Rindorf A, Wanless S, Harris MP: Effects of changes in sandeel availability on the reproductive output of seabirds. / Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2000, 202:241-52. CrossRef
    18. Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Shine R, Lourdais O: Short-term versus long-term effects of food intake on reproductive output in a viviparous snake, Vipera aspis . / Oikos 2001, 92:297-08. CrossRef
    19. Polis GA: / The Biology of Scorpions. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1990.
    20. McCormick SJ, Polis GA: Prey, predators, and parasites. In / The Biology of Scorpions. Edited by: Polis G. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1990:294-?320.
    21. Polis GA, Sissom DW: Life history. In / The Biology of Scorpions. Edited by: Polis G. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1990:161-23.
    22. Bennett AF, Gorman GC: Population density and energetics of lizards on a tropical island. / Oecologia 1979, 42:339-58.
    23. Huey RB, Pianka ER: Ecological consequences of foraging mode. / Ecology 1981, 62:991-99. CrossRef
    24. Miranda KL: / A study of cannibalism and maternal instincts in the scorpion Centruroides vittatus, MS thesis. University of Texas at Arlington: Department of Biology; 2001.
    25. Bub K, Bowerman RF: Prey capture by the scorpion Hadrurus arizonensis Ewing (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae). / J Arachnol 1979, 7:243-53.
    26. Marubini E, Valsecchi MG: / Analysing Survival Data from Clinical Trials and Observational Studies. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.
    27. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: / Multilevel Linear Modeling: Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th edition. Boston: Pearson Education Inc; 2007.
    28. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL: / The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. 2nd edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. CrossRef
    29. Lourdais O, Brischoux F, DeNardo D, Shine R: Protein catabolism in pregnant snakes ( Epicrates cenchria maurus Boidae) compromises musculature and performance after reproduction. / J Comp Physiol B 2004, 174:383-91. CrossRef
    30. Tallamy DW, Denno RF: Life history trade-offs in Gargaphia solani (Hemiptera: Tingidae): the cost of reproduction. / Ecology 1982, 63:616-20. CrossRef
    31. Brischoux F, Bonnet X, Shine R: Conflicts between feeding and reproduction in amphibious snakes (sea kraits, Laticauda spp.). / Austral Ecol 2011, 36:46-2. CrossRef
    32. Webber MM, Glaudas X, Rodríguez-Robles JA: Do sidewinder rattlesnakes ( Crotalus cerastes , Viperidae) cease feeding during the breeding season? / Copeia 2012, 2012:100-05. CrossRef
    33. Petersen CW, Marchetti K: Filial cannibalism in the Cortez damselfish, Stegastes rectifraenum . / Evolution 1989, 43:158-68. CrossRef
    34. Miller JS, Zink AG: Parental care trade-offs and the role of filial cannibalism in the maritime earwig, Anisolabis maritima . / Anim Behav 2012, 83:1387-394. CrossRef
    35. van der Meijden A, Herrel A, Summers A: Comparison of chela size and pincer force in scorpions; getting a first grip. / J Zool 2010, 280:319-25. CrossRef
    36. Lambert Y, Dutil JD: Energetic consequences of reproduction in Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua ) in relation to spawning level of somatic energy reserves. / Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2000, 57:815-25. CrossRef
    37. Koivula M, Koskela E, Mappes T, Oksanen TA: Cost of reproduction in the wild: manipulation of reproductive effort in the bank vole. / Ecology 2003, 84:398-05. CrossRef
    38. King RB: Determinants of offspring number and size in the brown snake, Storeria dekayi . / J Herpetol 1993, 27:175-85. CrossRef
    39. Guisande C, Sanchez J, Maneiro I, Miranda A: Trade-off between offspring number and offspring size in the marine copepod Euterpina acutifrons at different food concentrations. / Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1996, 143:37-4. CrossRef
    40. Therrien JF, C?té SD, Festa-Bianchet M, Ouellet JP: Maternal care in white-tailed deer: trade-off between maintenance and reproduction under food restriction. / Anim Behav 2008, 75:235-43. CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Michael M Webber (1)
    Javier A Rodríguez-Robles (1)

    1. School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89154-4004, USA
  • ISSN:1471-2148
文摘
Background Life history tradeoffs may result from temporal and physiological constraints intrinsic to an organism. When faced with limited time and energy, compromises occur and these resources are allocated among essential activities, such as body growth, maintenance, foraging, mating, and offspring care. We investigated potential tradeoffs that may occur between reproductive activities and feeding performance in female Arizona Bark Scorpions (Centruroides sculpturatus) by comparing the time taken to capture prey between non-reproductive and reproductive females (gravid females and females exhibiting maternal care, i.e. carrying offspring on their backs). Results Gravid females were as efficient at catching prey as non-gravid females. To control for variation in the duration of the maternal care period, we removed all offspring from all post-parturient females after 5?days. Brooding females and females 24?hours following offspring removal (FOR) did not successfully capture prey within the 900-second trial period. Twenty-eight days FOR, females caught prey faster than females displaying maternal care and females 24?hours FOR, but were not as efficient at catching prey as non-gravid and gravid females. When pursuing prey, C. sculpturatus exhibiting maternal care used an active foraging strategy more frequently than non-gravid, gravid, and females 28?days FOR. In contrast, non-gravid, gravid, and females 28?days FOR used active and ambush foraging with similar frequency. Conclusions Our data suggest that reproduction does not significantly reduce the predatory efficiency of gravid C. sculpturatus, and that these females can cope with increasing body mass and the physiological costs of gestation. However, the observation that brooding females and females 24?hours FOR did not catch prey within the trial period indicates that maternal care significantly reduces predatory efficiency in these scorpions. Females 28?days FOR were still not as efficient at catching prey as non-gravid and gravid females, suggesting that reproductive costs extend for at least 4?weeks after the end of the maternal care period. Preferential use of an active foraging strategy by brooding females may increase prey encounter rates, allowing the scorpions to more rapidly replenish energy reserves depleted during reproduction. However, active foraging may be energetically costly and increase predation risk for brooding females. Our findings regarding antagonistic interactions between reproduction and feeding in female C. sculpturatus demonstrate the pervasive nature of reproductive costs for viviparous females, and may provide insight on factors that influence the diversity of reproductive strategies observed in nature.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700