Identification versus counting protocols as sources of uncertainty in diatom-based ecological status assessments

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Maria Kahlert (1) Maria.Kahlert@slu.se
  Martyn Kelly (2)
  Raino-Lars Albert (3)
  Salom茅 F. P. Almeida (4)
  Tom谩拧 Be拧ta (5)
  Sa煤l Blanco (6)
  Michel Coste (7)
  Luc Denys (8)
  Luc Ector (9)
  Mark茅ta Fr谩nkov谩 (10)
  Da拧a Hl煤bikov谩 (9)
  Plamen Ivanov (11)
  Bryan Kennedy (12)
  Petr Marvan (14)
  Adrienne Mertens (15)
  Juha Miettinen (3)
  Joanna Picinska-Fa艂tynowicz (13)
  Juliette Rosebery (7)
  Elisabet Torn茅s (16)
  Sirje Vilbaste (17)
  Andrea Vogel (18)
• 关键词：Algae – ; Monitoring – ; Phytobenthos – ; Rivers – ; Intercalibration – ; Water Framework Directive
• 刊名：Hydrobiologia
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：October 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：695
• 期：1
• 页码：109-124
• 全文大小：446.6 KB
• 参考文献：1. Aboal, M., M. Alvarez Cobelas, J. Cambra & L. Ector, 2003. Floristic list of non-marine diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) of Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and Canary Islands. Updated taxonomy and bibliography. Diatom Monographs 4: 1–639.
  2. Alles, E., M. N枚rpel-Schempp & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991. Zur Systematik und 脰kologie charakteristischer Eunotia-Arten (Bacillariophyceae) in elektrolytarmen Bachoberl盲ufen. Nova Hedwigia 53: 171–213.
  3. Alverson, A. J., K. M. Manoylov & R. J. Stevenson, 2003. Laboratory sources of error for algal community attributes during sample preparation and counting. Journal of Applied Phycology 15: 357–369.
  4. Blanco, S., I. 脕lvarez & C. Cejudo, 2008. A test on different aspects of diatom processing techniques. Journal of Applied Phycology 20: 445–450.
  5. Buffagni, A. & M. Furse, 2006. Intercalibration and comparison – major results and conclusions from the STAR project. Hydrobiologia 566: 357–364.
  6. CEMAGREF, 1982. Etude des M茅thodes Biologiques d’Appr茅ciation Quantitative de la Qualit茅 des Eaux. Minist猫re de l’Agriculture, CEMAGREF, Division Qualit茅 des Eaux, P锚che et Pisciculture, Lyon: 218 pp.
  7. Coste, M. & L. Ector, 2000. Diatom茅es invasives exotiques ou rares en France: principales observations effectu茅es au cours des derni猫res d茅cennies. Systematics and Geography of Plants 70: 373–400.
  8. Ector, L., 2011. 1st European Workshop on Diatom Taxonomy (1st EWDT). Algological Studies 136–137: 1–4.
  9. Engelberg, K., 1987. Die Diatomeen-Z枚nose in einem Mittelgebirgsbach und die Abgrenzung jahreszeitlicher Aspekte mit Hilfe der Dominanz-Identit盲t. Archiv f眉r Hydrobiologie 110: 217–236.
  10. European Committee for Standardization, 2003. European Standard. EN 13946. Water Quality – Guidance Standard for the Routine Sampling and Pretreatment of Benthic Diatoms from Rivers. CEN, Brussels: 14 pp.
  11. European Committee for Standardization, 2004. European Standard. EN 14407. Water Quality – Guidance Standard for the Identification, Enumeration and Interpretation of Benthic Diatom Samples from Running Waters. CEN, Brussels: 12 pp.
  12. Haase, P., J. Murray-Bligh, S. Lohse, S. Pauls, A. Sundermann, R. Gunn & R. Clarke, 2006. Assessing the impact of errors in sorting and identifying macroinvertebrate samples. Hydrobiologia 566: 505–521.
  13. Hartley, B., H. G. Barber & J. R. Carter, 1996. An Atlas of British Diatoms. Biopress, Bristol.
  14. Hustedt, F., 1927–1966. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, 脰sterreichs und der Schweiz mit Ber眉cksichtigung der 眉brigen L盲nder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In Dr L. Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamenflora von Deutschland, 脰sterreich und der Schweiz, Vol. 7. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.
  15. Jahn, R., W.-H. Kusber & O. E. Romero, 2009. Cocconeis pediculus Ehrenberg and C. placentula Ehrenberg var. placentula (Bacillariophyta): typification and taxonomy. Fottea 9: 275–288.
  16. Kahlert, M., R.-L. Albert, E.-L. Antilla, R. Bengtsson, C. Bigler, T. Eskola, V. G盲lman, S. Gottschalk, E. Herlitz, A. Jarlman, J. Kasperoviciene, M. Kokociński, H. Luup, J. Miettinen, I. Paunksnyte, K. Piirsoo, I. Quintana, J. Raunio, B. Sandell, H. Simola, I. Sundberg, S. Vilbaste & J. Weckstr枚m, 2009. Harmonization is more important than experience – results of the first Nordic-Baltic diatom intercalibration exercise 2007 (stream monitoring). Journal of Applied Phycology 21: 471–482.
  17. Kelly, M. G., 2001. Use of similarity measures for quality control of benthic diatom samples. Water Research 35: 2784–2788.
  18. Kelly, M., C. Bennett, M. Coste, F. Delmas, L. Denys, L. Ector, C. Fauville, M. Ferreol, M. Golub, A. Jarlman, M. Kahlert, J. Lucey, B. Ni Chathain, I. Pardo, P. Pfister, J. Picinska-Faltynowicz, C. Schranz, J. Schaumburg, J. Tison, H. van Dam & S. Vilbaste 2007. Central/Baltic GIG Phytobenthos Intercalibration Exercise. Final report. CB GIG Phytobenthos IC Report – Technical report: 67 pp.
  19. Kelly, M., C. Bennett, M. Coste, C. Delgado, F. Delmas, L. Denys, L. Ector, C. Fauville, M. Ferr茅ol, M. Golub, A. Jarlman, M. Kahlert, J. Lucey, B. N铆 Chath谩in, I. Pardo, P. Pfister, J. Picinska-Faltynowicz, J. Rosebery, C. Schranz, J. Schaumburg, H. van Dam & S. Vilbaste, 2009. A comparison of national approaches to setting ecological status boundaries in phytobenthos assessment for the European Water Framework Directive: results of an intercalibration exercise. Hydrobiologia 621: 169–182.
  20. Krammer, K., 1997a. Die cymbelloiden Diatomeen. Eine Monographie der weltweit bekannten Taxa. Teil 1. Allgemeines und Encyonema Part. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 36: 1–382.
  21. Krammer, K., 1997b. Die cymbelloiden Diatomeen. Eine Monographie der weltweit bekannten Taxa. Teil 2. Encyonema Part., Encyonopsis und Cymbellopsis. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 37: 1–469.
  22. Krammer, K., 2000. The genus Pinnularia. In Lange-Bertalot, H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 1. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell: 703 pp.
  23. Krammer, K., 2002. Cymbella. In Lange-Bertalot, H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 3. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell: 584 pp.
  24. Krammer, K., 2003. Cymbopleura, Delicata, Navicymbula, Gomphocymbellopsis, Afrocymbella. In Lange-Bertalot, H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 4. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell: 530 pp.
  25. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1986. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), S眉脽wasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart: 876 pp.
  26. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 2004a. S眉脽wasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/3: Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Elsevier GmbH, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg: 599 pp.
  27. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 2004b. S眉脽wasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/4: Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Erg盲nzungen zu Achnanthes s.l., Navicula s. str., Gomphonema. Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis Teil 1–4. Erg盲nzter Nachdruck. Elsevier GmbH, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg: 468 pp.
  28. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 2007. S眉脽wasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/2: Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Erg盲nzter Nachdruck der 1. Auflage. Elsevier GmbH, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg: 611 pp.
  29. Lange-Bertalot, H., 2001. Navicula sensu stricto. 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato. Frustulia. In Lange-Bertalot, H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 2. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell: 526 pp.
  30. Lange-Bertalot, H. & D. Metzeltin, 1996. Oligotrophie-Indikatoren. 800 Taxa repr盲sentativ f眉r drei diverse Seen-Typen, kalkreich – oligodystroph – schwach gepuffertes Weichwasser. Iconographia Diatomologica 2: 1–390.
  31. Lavoie, I., K. M. Somers, A. M. Paterson & P. J. Dillon, 2005. Assessing scales of variability in benthic diatom community structure. Journal of Applied Phycology 17: 509–513.
  32. Lecointe, C., M. Coste & J. Prygiel, 1993. “OMNIDIA” software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 509–513.
  33. Levkov, Z., 2009. Amphora sensu lato. In Lange-Bertalot, H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 5. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell: 916 pp.
  34. McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford, 2006. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 5.32. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.
  35. Monnier, O., F. Rimet, M. Bey, R. Chavaux & L. Ector, 2007. Sur l’identit茅 de Cocconeis euglypta Ehrenberg 1854 et C. lineata Ehrenberg 1843 – Une approche par les sources historiques. Diatomania 11: 30–45.
  36. Morales, E. A., 2002. Sixth NAWQA Taxonomy Workshop on Harmonization of Algal Taxonomy October 2001. Report No. 02-10. The Patrick Center for Environmental Research, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia: 37 pp.
  37. Morales, E. A., 2004. Twelfth NAWQA Workshop on Harmonization of Algal Taxonomy February 26–29, 2004. Report No. 06-03. Patrick Center for Environmental Research, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia: 193 pp.
  38. Prygiel, J. & M. Coste, 2000. Guide m茅thodologique pour la mise en oeuvre de l’Indice Biologique Diatom茅es NF T 90-354. Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie – CEMAGREF, Groupement de Bordeaux: 134 pp.
  39. Prygiel, J., P. Carpentier, S. Almeida, M. Coste, J.-C. Druart, L. Ector, D. Guillard, M.-A. Honor茅, R. Iserentant, P. Ledeganck, C. Lalanne-Cassou, C. Lesniak, I. Mercier, P. Moncaut, M. Nazart, N. Nouchet, F. Peres, V. Peeters, F. Rimet, A. Rumeau, S. Sabater, F. Straub, M. Torrisi, L. Tudesque, B. Van de Vijver, H. Vidal, J. Vizinet & N. Zydek, 2002. Determination of the biological diatom index (IBD NF T 90-354): results of an intercomparison exercise. Journal of Applied Phycology 14: 27–39.
  40. Reichardt, E., 1997. Taxonomische Revision des Artenkomplexes um Gomphonema pumilum (Bacillariophyceae). Nova Hedwigia 1–4: 99–129.
  41. Rott, E., E. Pipp, P. Pfister, H. van Dam, K. Ortler, N. Binder & K. Pall, 1999. Indikationslisten f眉r Aufwuchsalgen in 枚sterreichischen Flie脽gew盲ssern. Teil 2: Trophieindikation (sowie geochemische Pr盲ferenzen, taxonomische und toxikologische Anmerkungen). Wasserwirtschaftskataster herausgegeben vom Bundesministerium f. Land- u. Forstwirtschaft, Wien: 248 pp.
  42. StatSoft, Inc., 2011. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. www.statsoft.com. Accessed 31 Mar 2011
  43. Stevenson, R. J., Y. Pan & H. van Dam, 2010. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In Smol, J. P. & E. F. Stoermer (eds), The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 57–85.
  44. The Commission of the European Communities, 2008. Commission decision of 30 October 2008 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise. Official Journal of the European Communities L332: 20–44.
  45. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 20000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327: 1–72.
  46. Van de Vijver, B., M. Kelly, S. Blanco, A. Jarlman & L. Ector, 2008. The unmasking of a sub-Antarctic endemic: Psammothidium abundans (Manguin) Bukhtiyarova et Round in European rivers. Diatom Research 23: 233–242.
  47. Verdonschot, P. F. M., 2006. Evaluation of the use of Water Framework Directive typology descriptors, reference sites and spatial scale in macroinvertebrate stream typology. Hydrobiologia 566: 39–58.
• 作者单位：1. Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7050, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden2. Bowburn Consultancy, 11 Monteigne Drive, Bowburn, Durham, DH6 5QB UK3. Ecomonitor Ltd., L盲nsikatu 15, 80110 Joensuu, Finland4. Department of Biology, GeoBioSciences, GeoTechnologies and GeoEngineering (GeoBioTec) Research Unit, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal5. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Brani拧ovsk谩 31, 370 05 膶esk茅 Bud臎jovice, Czech Republic6. Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management, University of Le贸n, 24071 Le贸n, Spain7. Water Quality and Wastewater Department, Irstea, 50, Avenue de Verdun, Gazinet, 33612 Cestas Cedex, France8. Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Kliniekstraat 25, 1070 Brussels, Belgium9. Department of Environment and Agro-Biotechnologies (EVA), Public Research Centre鈥擥abriel Lippmann, 41 rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg10. Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, AV 膶R, Lidick谩 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic11. Faculty of Biology, Sofia University 鈥淪t. Kliment Ohridski鈥? 8 Dragan Tzankov Blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria12. EPA, John Moore Road, Castlebar, Irl, Mayo, Ireland13. Department of Ecology, Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, National Research Institute, Wroc艂aw Branch, Parkowa 30, A55 51-616 Wroc艂aw, Poland14. Limni s.r.o., Kalvodova 13, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic15. Grontmij Nederland B.V., Division Water, Team Ecology, P.O. Box 95125, 1090 HC Amsterdam, The Netherlands16. Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA), H2O Building, Scientific and Technologic Park of the University of Girona, Emili Grahit 101, E-17003 Girona, Spain17. Center for Limnology, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Riia 181, 51014 Tartu, Estonia18. Inninger Str. 17, 82229 Seefeld-Hechendorf, Germany
• ISSN：1573-5117

文摘

In 2009, seventeen analysts participated in a pan-European diatom ring-test (intercalibration), analyzing nine samples from seven countries following the European standard EN 14407. The objective of this exercise was to agree on practical conventions on diatom identification to facilitate future intercalibration work and to assess the extent to which national differences in sample analysis (counting protocol and identification conventions) contribute to variability in EU-level comparisons of diatom-based methods. Differences in the reported taxa lists were large, but not a major source of variation in values of a common metric (the phytobenthos Intercalibration Common Metric, ICM). Therefore, every country can apply its own identification conventions for national assessments, and still be fairly confident that the ICM reflects the national classification of its streams. Part of the index variation was due to differences in counting protocols and care should be taken when handling broken valves, girdle views and small taxa. More work at both national and European level is needed to provide a harmonized way of using diatoms for ecological status assessments in the future.