Development of a Measure of Barriers to Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) Aftercare Attendance

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Beth M. L. Miller ; Kylie D. Murphy ; Paul E. O'Brien ; Leah Brennan
• 关键词：LAGB ; Aftercare ; Attrition ; Perceived barriers ; Compliance ; Attendance ; Complications ; Follow ; up ; Measurement
• 刊名：Obesity Surgery
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：April 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：26
• 期：4
• 页码：776-784
• 全文大小：336 KB
• 参考文献：1.Pontiroli A, Fossati A, Vedani P, et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcome of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1492–7. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-008-9428-8 .CrossRef PubMed
  2.Poole N, Atar A, Kuhanendran D, et al. Compliance with surgical after-care following bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: a retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2005;15(2):261–5. doi:10.​1381/​0960892053268499​ .CrossRef PubMed
  3.Sivagnanam P, Rhodes M. The importance of follow-up and distance from centre in weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10):2432–8. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-0970-9 .CrossRef PubMed
  4.Lanthaler M, Aigner F, Kinzl J, et al. Long-term results and complications following adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20(8):1078–85.CrossRef PubMed
  5.Suter M, Calmes JMM, Paroz A, et al. A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):829–35.CrossRef PubMed
  6.Moroshko I, Brennan L, O’Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systematic review of the literature. Obesity Surgery. 2012:1–8. doi: 10.​1007/​s11695-012-0691-3
  7.DeNino WF, Osler T, Evans EG, et al. Travel distance as factor in follow-up visit compliance in postlaparoscopic adjustable gastric banding population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(6):597–600. doi:10.​1016/​j.​soard.​2010.​09.​008 .CrossRef PubMed
  8.Miller BM, Brennan L. Measuring and reporting attrition from obesity treatment programs: a call to action. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014. doi:10.​1016/​j.​orcp.​2014.​08.​007 .PubMed
  9.Teixeira PJ, Going SB, Houtkooper LB, et al. Pretreatment predictors of attrition and successful weight management in women. Int J Obes. 2004;28(9):1124.CrossRef
  10.Moroshko I, Brennan L, O’Brien P. Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2011;12(11):912–34. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1467-789X.​2011.​00915.​x .CrossRef PubMed
  11.Colombo O, Ferretti V, Ferraris C, et al. Is drop-out from obesity treatment a predictable and preventable event? Nutr J. 2014. doi:10.​1186/​475-2891-13-13 .PubMed PubMedCentral
  12.Grossi E, Dalle Grave R, Mannucci E, et al. Complexity of attrition in the treatment of obesity: clues from a structured telephone interview. Int J Obes. 2006;30(7):1132–7.CrossRef
  13.Gross D, Julion W, Fogg L. What motivates participation and dropout among low-income urban families of color in a prevention intervention?*. Fam Relat. 2001;50(3):246–54. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1741-3729.​2001.​00246.​x .CrossRef
  14.Kitscha CEBRD, Brunet K, Farmer A, et al. Reasons for non-return to a pediatric weight management program. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2009;70(2):89–94.CrossRef PubMed
  15.Skelton JA, Goff Jr D, C., Ip E, et al. Attrition in a multidisciplinary pediatric weight management clinic. Childhood Obesity. 2011;7(3):185–93. doi: doi:10.​1089/​chi.​2011.​0010
  16.Barlow SE, Ohlemeyer CL. Parent reasons for nonreturn to a pediatric weight management program. Clin Pediatr. 2006;45(4):355–60. doi:10.​1177/​0009922806045004​08 .CrossRef
  17.Dalle Grave R, Melchionda N, Calugi S, et al. Continuous care in the treatment of obesity: an observational multicentre study. J Intern Med. 2005;258(3):265–73. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2796.​2005.​01524.​x .CrossRef PubMed
  18.Pokrajac-Bulian A, Ambrosi-Randic N, Ruzic A. Weight loss and maintenance in overweight and obese patients with cardiovascular disease. Psychol Topics. 2010;19(2):355–72. doi:10.​1016/​j.​psc.​2004.​09.​008 . PubMed.
  19.Lantz H, Peltonen M, Agren L, et al. A dietary and behavioural programme for the treatment of obesity. A 4-year clinical trial and a long-term posttreatment follow-up. J Intern Med. 2003;254(3):272–9. doi:10.​1046/​j.​1365-2796.​2003.​01187.​x .CrossRef PubMed
  20.Andersson I, Rossner S. Weight development, drop-out pattern and changes in obesity-related risk factors after two years treatment of obese men. Int J Obes. 1997;21(3):211–21.CrossRef
  21.Garaulet M, Pérez-Llamas F, Zamora S, et al. Weight loss and possible reasons for dropping out of a dietary/behavioural programme in the treatment of overweight patients. J Hum Nutr Diet. 1999;12(3):219–27. PubMed.CrossRef
  22.Compe A, Papoz L, Avignon A. Outcome of patients consulting in an outpatient nutrition clinic for excessive body weight. Diabetes Metab. 2003;29(5):519–24. doi:10.​1016/​s1262-3636(07)70066-6 .CrossRef PubMed
  23.Levine MD, Ringham RM, Kalarchian MA, et al. Is family-based behavioral weight control appropriate for severe pediatric obesity? Int J Eat Disord. 2001;30(3):318–28. doi:10.​1002/​eat.​1091 .CrossRef PubMed
  24.Sweeney ME, Hill JO, Heller PA, et al. Severe vs moderate energy restriction with and without exercise in the treatment of obesity: efficiency of weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;57(2):127–34.PubMed
  25.Donnelly JE, Hill J, Jacobsen D, et al. Effects of a 16-month randomized controlled exercise trial on body weight and composition in young, overweight men and women: the Midwest Exercise Trial. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(11):1343–50.CrossRef PubMed
  26.DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
  27.Frazer L, Lawley M. Questionnaire design and administration: a practical guide. Milton: Queensland: Wiley; 2000.
  28.Hochberg LS, Murphy KD, O'Brien PE, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance and attrition. Obes Surg. 2015. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-015-1597-7 .PubMed
  29.Costello AB, Osbourne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10:1–9.
  30.Worthington RL, Whittaker TA. Scale development research: a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns Psychol. 2006;34(6):806–38. doi:10.​1177/​0011000006288127​ .CrossRef
  31.Brennan L, Walkley J, Fraser SF, et al. Motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy in the treatment of adolescent overweight and obesity: study design and methodology. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008;29(3):359–75. PubMed.CrossRef PubMed
  32.Moroshko I, Brennan L, Warren N, et al. Patients’ perspectives on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance: qualitative assessment. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):266–75.CrossRef PubMed
  33.Gable RK, Wolf MB. Instrument development in the affective domain: measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings. Boston: Kluner Academic; 1993.CrossRef
  34.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2007.
  35.Pallant J. A step by step guide to scale development and evaluation. Hawthorn: Swinburne University, no date.
  36.Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1992.
  37.Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  38.Dalle Grave R, Calugi S, Molinari E, et al. Weight loss expectations in obese patients and treatment attrition: an observational multicenter study. Obesity. 2005;13(11):1961–9.CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Beth M. L. Miller (1) (2)
  Kylie D. Murphy (1) (3)
  Paul E. O’Brien (1)
  Leah Brennan (1) (3)
  
  1. Centre for Obesity Research and Education, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
  2. School of Psychology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
  3. School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Locked Bag 4115, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia
  
• 刊物主题：Surgery;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1708-0428

文摘

Background Regular aftercare attendance following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is associated with greater weight loss and fewer post-surgical complications. Despite high reported rates of attrition from LAGB aftercare, the reasons for non-attendance have not been thoroughly explored. The aim of the current study was to describe the scale development, explore the factor structure and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Gastric Banding Aftercare Attendance Questionnaire (GBAAQ)—a tool that measures barriers to aftercare attendance in LAGB patients.