Comparability of Weight Loss Reporting After Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy Using BOLD Data 2008-011

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：John P. Sczepaniak ; Milton L. Owens ; Heena Shukla ; John Perlegos…
• 关键词：Gastric bypass ; Sleeve gastrectomy ; BOLD ; %TWL ; %EWL ; %EBMIL
• 刊名：Obesity Surgery
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：May 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：25
• 期：5
• 页码：788-795
• 全文大小：963 KB
• 参考文献：1.Van de Laar A, De Caluwé L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763-. PMID: 21197603.View Article PubMed
  2.Guidelines for reporting results in bariatric surgery. Standards Committee, American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg. 1997 Dec; 7(6):521-2. PMID: 9730513.
  3.Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Comparison of weight loss and body composition changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(5):582-. PMID: 19560983.View Article PubMed
  4.Kaess BM, Pedley A, Massaro JM, et al. The ratio of visceral to subcutaneous fat, a metric of body fat distribution, is a unique correlate of cardiometabolic risk. Diabetologia. 2012;55(10):2622-0. doi:10.-007/?s00125-012-2639-5 . PMID: 22898763.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  5.Metropolitan Life Foundation (1983) Metropolitan height and weight tables. Statistical Bulletin; 64:2-9. PMID: 6623350.
  6.Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1029-4. PMID: 10982506.View Article PubMed
  7.Biertho L, Steffen R, Ricklin T, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a comparative study of 1,200 cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(4):536-4. PMID: 14522318.View Article PubMed
  8.Biron S, Hould F, Lebel S, et al. Twenty years of biliopancreatic diversion: what is the goal of the surgery? Obes Surg. 2004;14:160-. PMID: 15018742.View Article PubMed
  9.Van de Laar A. Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) suggests excess weight loss and excess BMI loss to be inappropriate outcome measures, demonstrating better alternatives. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1843-. PMID: 22923311.View Article PubMed
  10.van de Laar AW. Algorithm for weight loss after gastric bypass surgery considering body mass index, gender, and age from the Bariatric Outcome Longitudinal Database (BOLD). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;13. PMID: 24120981.
  11.Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD). ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01002352.
  12.DeMaria E, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Obes Surg. 2010;6(4):347-5. PMID: 20176512.View Article
  13.Kadeli D, Sczepaniak J, Kumar K, et al. The effect of preoperative weight loss before gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes. Epub 2012 Jun 7. PMID: 22720139.
  14.Sczepaniak JP, Owens ML, Garner W, et al. A simpler method for predicting weight loss in the first year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes. 2012 Jan; Epub 2012 Jan 19. PMID: 22315671.
  15.Wadden TA, Foreyt JP, Foster GD, et al. Weight loss with naltrexone SR/bupropion SR combination therapy as an adjunct to behavior modification: the COR-BMOD trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011;19(1):110-0. PMID: 20559296.View Article
  16.Wadden TA, Volger S, Sarwer DB, et al. A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):1969-9. PMID: 22082239.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  17.Taylor JR, Dietrich E, Powell J. Lorcaserin for weight management. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013;6:209-6. PMID: 23788837.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  18.Garvey WT, Ryan DH, Look M, et al. Two-year sustained weight loss and metabolic benefits with controlled-release phentermine/topiramate in obese and overweight adults (SEQUEL): a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 extension study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition December 7, 2011.
  19.Tamboli R, Hossain H, Marks P, et al. Body composition and energy metabolism following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes. 2010;18(9):1718-4. PMID: 20414197.View Article
  20.Livingston EH, Sebastian JL, Huerta S, et al. Biexponential model for predicting weight loss after gastric surgery for obesity. J Surg Res. 2001;101(2):216-4. PMID: 11735279.View Article PubMed
  21.Karmali S, Birch DW, Sharma AM. Is it time to abandon excess weight loss in reporting surgical weight loss? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(4):503-. PMID: 19632649.View Article PubMed
  
• 作者单位：John P. Sczepaniak (1) (3)
  Milton L. Owens (2)
  Heena Shukla (1)
  John Perlegos (1) (3)
  William Garner (1)
  
  1. Sczepaniak Health and Medical Enterprises, 6871 Eberhart St., San Diego, CA, 92115, USA
  3. Saint George’s University, University Centre, Grenada, West Indies
  2. Coastal Center for Obesity, 2617 E. Chapman Ave. #307, Orange, CA, 92869, USA
  
• 刊物主题：Surgery;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1708-0428

文摘

Background Weight loss after bariatric surgery is commonly reported as either a percentage of initial body weight (%IBW) or 100?% minus %IBW which is a percentage of total weight loss (%TWL). These are basically equivalent expressions. Weight loss is also reported as %EWL or as a percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL). These last two expressions incorporate the concepts of ideal body weight and BMI--5 as reference points. More straightforward but less commonly used is absolute weight loss. This study compares these various measures using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD). Methods BOLD data, 2008-011, was accessed for outcomes on 239,659 gastric bypass (GB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients with approval of the Surgical Review Corporation. The outcome data was converted into %TWL, %EWL, and %EBMIL. %EBMIL was varied by changing the reference BMI from 1 to 25?kg/m2. The post operation data was analyzed for both procedures. Variation coefficients (VC) were compared using different measurements on the same data pool. We assumed that the lesser the variation, the more reliable the measure is, and therefore, we made use of the VC to compare the different reporting methods. Results There were 164,247 patients who remained after removal of errors and missing data. Demographics are as follows: 78.1?% female, 73.1?% white, 12.5?% black, 8.71?% Hispanic, 81.6?% GB, 18.4?% SG, mean age of 44.8?years, height of 167.0?cm, weight of 132.0?kg, and BMI of 47.1?kg/m2. GB patients had 26.8?%TWL at 6?months (VC--1.5) and 34.2?%TWL at 12?months (VC--7.0). %EWL was 54.7 at 6?months (VC--7.3) and 69.4 at 12?months (VC--0.9). Varying the reference BMI for %EBMIL showed the lowest VC to be 0-?kg/m2 for GB up to 12?months post operation. SG patients had 24.0?%TWL at 6?months (VC--5.4) and 29.5 at 12?months (VC--0.5). %EWL was 50.0?% at 6?months (VC--1.4) and 60.2?% at 12?months (VC--4.5). Varying the reference BMI for %EBMIL showed that the lowest VC occurred when the reference weight was chosen as 0?kg/m2 for both GB and SG. %TWL or, equivalently, %IBW had the lowest variation coefficient and therefore is the more accurate measure of weight loss following bariatric surgery. Conclusions For ease and accuracy of comparison, the percentage of initial body weight or percentage of total weight loss should be used for the expression of weight loss after surgery.