Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jennifer L. Hay (1)
  Thomas M. Atkinson (1)
  Bryce B. Reeve (2)
  Sandra A. Mitchell (3)
  Tito R. Mendoza (4)
  Gordon Willis (3)
  Lori M. Minasian (3)
  Steven B. Clauser (3)
  Andrea Denicoff (3)
  Ann O’Mara (3)
  Alice Chen (3)
  Antonia V. Bennett (2)
  Diane B. Paul (6)
  Joshua Gagne (5)
  Lauren Rogak (1)
  Laura Sit (1)
  Vish Viswanath (5)
  Deborah Schrag (5)
  Ethan Basch (1) (2)
  
• 关键词：Drug toxicity ; Neoplasms ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of results ; Qualitative research
• 刊名：Quality of Life Research
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：February 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：23
• 期：1
• 页码：257-269
• 全文大小：303 KB
• 作者单位：Jennifer L. Hay (1)
  Thomas M. Atkinson (1)
  Bryce B. Reeve (2)
  Sandra A. Mitchell (3)
  Tito R. Mendoza (4)
  Gordon Willis (3)
  Lori M. Minasian (3)
  Steven B. Clauser (3)
  Andrea Denicoff (3)
  Ann O’Mara (3)
  Alice Chen (3)
  Antonia V. Bennett (2)
  Diane B. Paul (6)
  Joshua Gagne (5)
  Lauren Rogak (1)
  Laura Sit (1)
  Vish Viswanath (5)
  Deborah Schrag (5)
  Ethan Basch (1) (2)
  
  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
  2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  3. United States National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
  4. University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
  6. New York, NY, USA
  5. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
  
• ISSN：1573-2649

文摘

Purpose The National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is a library of question items that enables patient reporting of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials. This study contributes content validity evidence of the PRO-CTCAE by incorporating cancer patient input of the relevance and comprehensiveness of the item library. Methods Cognitive interviews were conducted among patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy at multiple sites to evaluate comprehension, memory retrieval, judgment, and response mapping related to AE terms (e.g., nausea), attribute terms (regarding frequency, severity, or interference), response options, and recall period. Three interview rounds were conducted with ?0 patients completing each item per round. Items were modified and retested if ? patients exhibited cognitive difficulties or if experienced by ?5?% patients. Results One hundred and twenty-seven patients participated (35?% ≤high school, 28?% non-white, and 59?% female). Most AE terms (63/80) generated no cognitive difficulties. The remaining 17 were modified without further difficulties by Round 3. Terms were comprehended regardless of education level. Attribute terms and response options required no modifications. Patient adherence to recall period (7 days) was improved when the reference period was incorporated. Conclusions This study provides evidence confirming comprehension of the US English language versions of items in the PRO-CTCAE library for measuring symptomatic AEs from the patient perspective within the context of cancer treatment. Several minor changes were made to the items to improve item clarity, comprehension, and ease of response judgment. This study helps to establish the content validity of PRO-CTCAE items for patient reporting of AEs during cancer treatment.