Predicting One and Three Month Postoperative Somatic Concerns, Psychological Distress, and Maladaptive Eating Behaviors in Bariatric Surgery Candidates with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF)

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ryan J. Marek (1)
  Yossef S. Ben-Porath (1)
  Julie Merrell (2)
  Kathleen Ashton (2)
  Leslie J. Heinberg (2)
  
• 关键词：Bariatric surgery ; MMPI ; 2 ; RF ; Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory ; Postoperative ; Somatization ; Demoralization ; Psychology ; Personality ; Maladaptive eating ; Binge eating ; Presurgical psychological screening
• 刊名：Obesity Surgery
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：April 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：24
• 期：4
• 页码：631-639
• 全文大小：350 KB
• 参考文献：1. Sarwer DB, Allison KC, Bailer B, et al. Bariatric surgery. In: Block AR, Sarwer DB, editors. Presurgical psychological screening: understanding patients, improving outcomes. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2013.
  2. Mitchell JE, Selzer F, Kalarchian MA, et al. Psychopathology before surgery in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery-3 (LABS-3) psychosocial study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(5):533-1. 2012.07.001" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  3. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Levine MD, et al. Psychiatric disorders among bariatric surgery candidates: relationship to obesity and functional health status. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(2):328-4. 2.328" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  4. Fabricatore AN, Crerand CE, Wadden TA, et al. How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results. Obes Surg. 2006;16(5):567-3. 206776944986" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  5. Peterson CB, Berg K, Mitchell JE. Assessment of bariatric surgery candidates: structured interviews and self-report measures. In: Mitchell JE, de Zwann M, editors. Psychosocial assessment and treatment of bariatric surgery patients. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2012. p. 37-0.
  6. Block AR, Sarwer DB. In: Block AR, Sarwer DB, editors. Presurgical psychological screening: understanding patients, improving outcomes. 1st ed. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2013. CrossRef
  7. Heinberg LJ. The Role of psychological testing for bariatric/metabolic surgery candidates. Bariatric times: clinical developments and metabolic insights in total bariatric patient care. 2013;10(2).
  8. Butcher JN, Graham JR, Ben-Porath YS, et al. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. rev. ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2001.
  9. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
  10. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Levine MD, et al. Relationship of psychiatric disorders to 6-month outcomes after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):544-. 2008.03.003" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  11. Semanscin-Doerr DA, Windover A, Ashton K, et al. Mood disorders in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients: does it affect early weight loss? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(2):191-. 2009.11.017" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  12. Powers PS, Rosemurgy A, Boyd F, et al. Outcome of gastric restriction procedures: weight, psychiatric diagnoses, and satisfaction. Obes Surg. 1997;7(6):471-. 297765555197" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  13. Colles SL, Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Grazing and loss of control related to eating: two high-risk factors following bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(3):615-2. 2007.101" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  14. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Wilson GT, et al. Binge eating among gastric bypass patients at long-term follow-up. Obes Surg. 2002;12(2):270-. 202762552494" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  15. Mitchell JE, Lancaster KL, Burgard MA, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients' status after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2001;11(4):464-. 201321209341" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  16. Ben-Porath YS, Tellegen A. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008/2011.
  17. Tellegen A, Ben-Porath YS. The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF): technical manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008/2011.
  18. Ben-Porath YS. Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF. 1st ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2012.
  19. Marek RJ, Ben-Porath YS, Ashton K, et al. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory - 2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) scale score differences in bariatric surgery candidates diagnosed with binge eating disorder vs. BMI-matched controls. Int J Eat Disord. 2013. doi:10.1002/eat.22194 .
  20. Marek RJ, Ben-Porath YS, Windover A, et al. Assessing psychosocial functioning of bariatric surgery candidates with the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF). Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1864-3. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1024-x . 24-x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  21. Tarescavage AM, Wygant DB, Boutacoff LI, et al. Reliability, validity, and utility of the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2-restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) in assessments of bariatric surgery candidates. Psychol Assess. 2013;25(4):1179-4. doi:10.1037/a0033694 . CrossRef
  22. Wygant DB, Boutacoff LI, Arbisi PA, et al. Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured clinical (RC) scales in a sample of bariatric surgery candidates. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2007;14(3):197-05. doi:10.1007/s10880-007-9073-8 . CrossRef
  23. Markon KE, Krueger RF, Watson D. Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88(1):139-7. 22-3514.88.1.139" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  24. Sellbom M, Ben-Porath YS, Bagby RM. On the hierarchical structure of mood and anxiety disorders: confirmatory evidence and elaboration of a model of temperament markers. J Pers Disord. 2007;22:291-12.
  25. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user's guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 1998-011.
  26. Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004;9(4):466-1. 2-989X.9.4.466" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  27. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238-6. 2909.107.2.238" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  28. Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1973;38(1):1-0. 2291170" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  29. Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivar Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173. 207/s15327906mbr2502_4" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  30. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 136-2.
  31. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3(1):4-0. 2810031002" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  32. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(3):464-04. CrossRef
  33. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2003.
  34. Hare RD, Neumann CS. The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: development, structural properties, and new directions. In: Patrick C, editor. Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. p. 58-0.
  35. Gunstad J, Mueller A, Stanek K, et al., editors. Cognitive dysfunction in obesity: implications for bariatric surgery patients. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2012.
  36. Galioto R, Gunstad J, Heinberg LJ, et al. Adherence and weight loss outcomes in bariatric surgery: does cognitive function play a role? Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1703-0. CrossRef
  37. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery?: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2011;12(2):142-. 2010.00720.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  38. Garcia S, Fedor A, Spitznagel MB, et al. Patient reports of cognitive problems are not associated with neuropsychological test performance in bariatric surgery candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;9(5):797-01. 2012.10.008" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Ryan J. Marek (1)
  Yossef S. Ben-Porath (1)
  Julie Merrell (2)
  Kathleen Ashton (2)
  Leslie J. Heinberg (2)
  
  1. Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242, USA
  2. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, 9500 Euclid Avenue/M61, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
  
• ISSN：1708-0428

文摘

Background Presurgical psychological screening of bariatric surgery candidates includes some form of standardized psychological assessment. However, associations between presurgical psychological screening and postoperative outcome have not been extensively studied. Here, we explore associations between presurgical Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scores and early postoperative Somatic Concerns, Psychological Distress, and Maladaptive Eating Behaviors. Methods The sample consisted of male (n--38) and female (n--21) patients who were administered the MMPI-2-RF at their presurgical psychological evaluation and received bariatric surgery. Patients were evaluated at their 1- and 3-month postoperative appointments. Results Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that three latent constructs—somatic concerns, psychological distress, and maladaptive eating behaviors—were represented by responses to a postoperative assessment and that these constructs could be measured consistently over time. Presurgical scores on MMPI-2-RF scales measuring internalizing dysfunction were associated with more psychological distress at postoperative follow-ups, scores on scales measuring somatization were associated with more postoperative somatic concerns, and scores on scales assessing emotional/internalizing, behavioral/externalizing, cognitive complaints, and thought dysfunction prior to surgery were associated with maladaptive eating behaviors after surgery. Conclusions In conjunction with a presurgical psychological interview, the MMPI-2-RF provides information that can assist in anticipating postoperative outcomes and inform efforts to prevent them.