Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for Morton neuroma: systematic review and meta-analysis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Bianca Bignotti ; Alessio Signori ; Maria Pia Sormani ; Luigi Molfetta…
• 关键词：Morton’s neuroma ; Ultrasound ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Meta ; analysis ; Review
• 刊名：European Radiology
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：August 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：25
• 期：8
• 页码：2254-2262
• 全文大小：734 KB
• 参考文献：1.Abreu E, Aubert S, Wavreille G, Gheno R, Canella C, Cotten A (2013) Peripheral tumor and tumor-like neurogenic lesions. Eur J Radiol 82:38-0PubMed View Article
  2.Lee MJ, Kim S, Huh YM, Song HT, Lee SA, Lee JW et al (2007) Morton neuroma: evaluated with ultrasonography and MR imaging. Korean J Radiol 8:148-55PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  3.Lee KS (2009) Musculoskeletal ultrasound: how to evaluate for Morton's neuroma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W172PubMed View Article
  4.Zanetti M, Ledermann T, Zollinger H, Hodler J (1997) Efficacy of MR imaging in patients suspected of having Morton's neuroma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:529-32PubMed View Article
  5.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, G?tzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  6.Newcombe RG (1998) Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 17:857-72PubMed View Article
  7.Fazal MA, Khan I, Thomas C (2012) Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Morton's neuroma. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102:184-86PubMed View Article
  8.Kankanala G, Jain AS (2007) The operational characteristics of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of plantar intermetatarsal neuroma. J Foot Ankle Surg 46:213-17PubMed View Article
  9.Oliver TB, Beggs I (1998) Ultrasound in the assessment of metatarsalgia: a surgical and histological correlation. Clin Radiol 53:287-89PubMed View Article
  10.Owens R, Gougoulias N, Guthrie H, Sakellariou A (2011) Morton's neuroma: clinical testing and imaging in 76 feet, compared to a control group. Foot Ankle Surg 17:197-00PubMed View Article
  11.Pastides P, El-Sallakh S, Charalambides C (2012) Morton's neuroma: a clinical versus radiological diagnosis. Foot Ankle Surg 18:22-4PubMed View Article
  12.Perini L, Del Borrello M, Cipriano R, Cavallo A, Volpe A (2006) Dynamic sonography of the forefoot in Morton's syndrome: correlation with magnetic resonance and surgery. Radiol Med 111:897-05PubMed View Article
  13.Quinn TJ, Jacobson JA, Craig JG, van Holsbeeck MT (2000) Sonography of Morton's neuromas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1723-728PubMed View Article
  14.Redd RA, Peters VJ, Emery SF, Branch HM, Rifkin MD (1989) Morton neuroma: sonographic evaluation. Radiology 171:415-17PubMed View Article
  15.Sharp RJ, Wade CM, Hennessy MS, Saxby TS (2003) The role of MRI and ultrasound imaging in Morton's neuroma and the effect of size of lesion on symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85:999-005View Article
  16.Sobiesk GA, Wertheimer SJ, Schulz R, Dalfovo M (1997) Sonographic evaluation of interdigital neuromas. J Foot Ankle Surg 36:364-66PubMed View Article
  17.Torres-Claramunt R, Ginés A, Pidemunt G, Puig L, de Zabala S (2012) MRI and ultrasonography in Morton's neuroma: diagnostic accuracy and correlation. Indian J Orthop 46:321-25PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  18.Zanetti M, Strehle JK, Kundert HP, Zollinger H, Hodler J (1999) Morton neuroma: effect of MR imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions. Radiology 213:583-88PubMed View Article
  19.Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Kransdorf MJ (2008) Imaging of soft tissue lesions of the foot and ankle. Radiol Clin North Am 46:1093-103PubMed View Article
  20.Martinoli C, Court-Payen M, Michaud J, Padua L, Altafini L et al (2010) Imaging of neuropathies about the ankle and foot. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14:344-56PubMed View Article
  21.Lucchetta M, Briani C, Liotta GA, Martinoli C, Coraci D, Padua L (2010) Ultrasonographic Tinel sign: comment. Muscle Nerve 41:570-71PubMed View Article
  22.Chipman JN, Mott RT, Stanton CA, Cartwright MS (2009) Ultrasonographic Tinel sign. Muscle Nerve 40:1033-035PubMed View Article
  23.Tagliafico A, Bodner G, Rosenberg I, Palmieri F, Garello I, Altafini L et al (2010) Peripheral nerves: ultrasound-guided interventional procedures. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14:559-66PubMed View Article
  24.Zanetti M, Weishaupt D (2005) MR imaging of the forefoot: Morton neuroma and differential diagnoses. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 9:175-86PubMed View Article
  25.Weishaupt D, Treiber K, Kundert HP, Zollinger H, Vienne P, Hodler J et al (2003) Morton neuroma: MR imaging in prone, supine, and upright weight-bearing body positions. Radiology 226:849-56PubMed View Article
  
• 作者单位：Bianca Bignotti (1)
  Alessio Signori (2)
  Maria Pia Sormani (2)
  Luigi Molfetta (3)
  Carlo Martinoli (1)
  Alberto Tagliafico (4)
  
  1. Radiology Department, University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi 8, 16138, Genoa, Genova, Italy
  2. Institute of Statistics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Pastore, 16132, Genoa, Italy
  3. Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Via L.B. Alberti, 16132, Genoa, Italy
  4. Institute of Anatomy, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, Via L.B. Alberti, 16132, Genoa, Italy
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Imaging and Radiology
  Diagnostic Radiology
  Interventional Radiology
  Neuroradiology
  Ultrasound
  Internal Medicine
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1432-1084

文摘

Objectives To compare ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of Morton’s neuroma. Methods Studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of US and MRI for Morton’s neuroma were retrieved from major medical libraries independently by two reviewers up to 1 April 2014. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were adopted. Results 277 studies were initially found, and the meta-analysis was conducted on 14 studies. US sensitivity was studied in five studies, MRI sensitivity in three studies, and bothin six studies. All studies used surgery as the reference standard. A high sensitivity (SE) of diagnostic testing was observed for both US (SE (95?% CI)--.91 (0.83-.96)) and MRI (SE (95?% CI)--.90 (0.82-.96)) with no significant differences between the two modalities in diagnosis (Q test p--.88). For MRI, specificity of test was 1.00 with a pooled estimation of 1.00 (0.73-.00), while the pooled specificity was 0.854 (95?% CI: 0.41-.00) for US. No differences were observed between US and MRI in study design (p--.76). Conclusion This meta-analysis shows that the SE of US (0.91) is equal to (p--.88) that of MRI (0.90) for identification of Morton’s neuroma. Key points -For Morton’s neuroma, US sensitivity is equal to MRI. -US is as accurate as MRI in diagnosing Morton’s neuroma. -US may be the most cost-effective imaging method for Morton’s neuroma.