A classically conditioned cocaine cue acquires greater control over motivated behavior in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Lindsay M. Yager (1)
  Terry E. Robinson (1)
  
• 关键词：Addiction ; Cocaine ; Sign ; tracking ; Goal ; tracking ; Incentive salience ; Pavlovian conditioning
• 刊名：Psychopharmacology
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：March 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：226
• 期：2
• 页码：217-228
• 全文大小：711KB
• 参考文献：1. Berridge KC (2012) From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation. Eur J Neurosci 35:1124-143 CrossRef
  2. Berridge KC, Robinson TE (1998) What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev 28:309-69 CrossRef
  3. Boakes R (1977) Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H, Hurwits H (eds) Operant-Pavlovian interactions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 67-7
  4. Buzsaki G (1982) The "Where is it?" reflex: autoshaping the orienting response. J Exp Anal Behav 37:461-84 CrossRef
  5. Cardinal RN, Parkinson JA, Hall J, Everitt BJ (2002) Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:321-52 CrossRef
  6. Cleland GG, Davey GCL (1983) Autoshaping in the rat: the effects of localizable visual and auditory signals for food. J Exp Anal Behav 40:47-6 CrossRef
  7. Crombag HS, Badiani A, Maren S, Robinson TE (2000) The role of contextual versus discrete drug-associated cues in promoting the induction of psychomotor sensitization to intravenous amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 116:1-2 CrossRef
  8. Cunningham CL, Niehus JS, Noble D (1993) Species difference in sensitivity to ethanol’s hedonic effects. Alcohol 10:97-02 CrossRef
  9. de Wit H, Stewart J (1981) Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 75:134-43 CrossRef
  10. Di Ciano P, Everitt BJ (2004) Conditioned reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with self-administered cocaine, heroin or sucrose: implications for the persistence of addictive behaviour. Neuropharmacology 47:202-13 CrossRef
  11. Everitt BJ, Dickinson A, Robbins TW (2001) The neuropsychological basis of addictive behaviour. Brain Res Rev 36:129-38 CrossRef
  12. Flagel SB, Watson SJ, Robinson TE, Akil H (2007) Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 191:599-07 CrossRef
  13. Flagel SB, Akil H, Robinson TE (2009) Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropharmacology 56:139-48 CrossRef
  14. Flagel SB, Robinson TE, Clark JJ, Clinton SM, Watson SJ, Seeman P, Phillips PEM, Akil H (2010) An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:388-00 CrossRef
  15. Flagel SB, Cameron CM, Pickup KN, Watson SJ, Akil H, Robinson TE (2011a) A food predictive cue must be attributed with incentive salience for it to induce c-fos mRNA expression in cortico-striatal-thalamic brain regions. Neuroscience 196:80-6 CrossRef
  16. Flagel SB, Clark JJ, Robinson TE, Mayo L, Czuj A, Willuhn I, Akers CA, Clinton SM, Phillips PEM, Akil H (2011b) A selective role for dopamine in stimulus-reward learning. Nature 469:53-7 CrossRef
  17. Franklin TR, Lohoff FW, Wang Z, Sciortino N, Harper D, Li Y, Jens W, Cruz J, Kampman K, Ehrman R, Berrettini W, Detre JA, O’Brien CP, Childress AR (2008) DAT genotype modulates brain and behavioral responses elicited by cigarette cues. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:717-28 CrossRef
  18. Grastyan E, Buzsaki G (1979) The orienting-exploratory response hypothesis of discriminative conditioning. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 39:491-01
  19. Grastyan E, Vereczkei L (1974) Effects of spatial separation of the conditioned signal from the reinforcement: a demonstration of the conditioned character of the orienting response or the orientational character of conditioning. Behav Biol 10:121-46 CrossRef
  20. Hearst E, Jenkins HM (1974) Sign tracking: the stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Monograph of the Psychonomic Society, Austin
  21. Holland PC (1977) Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of form of Pavlovian conditioned response. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 3:77-04 CrossRef
  22. Holland PC (1980) Infuence of visual conditioned stimulus characteristics on the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 6:81-7 CrossRef
  23. Johnson WG (1974) Effect of cue prominence and subject weight on human food-directed performance. J Pers Soc Psychol 29:843-48 CrossRef
  24. Kruzich PJ, Congleton KM, See RE (2001) Conditioned reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior with a discrete compound stimulus classically conditioned with intravenous cocaine. Behav Neurosci 115:1086-092 CrossRef
  25. Lomanowska AM, Lovic V, Rankine MJ, Mooney SJ, Robinson TE, Kraemer GW (2011) Inadequate early social experience increases the incentive salience of reward-related cues in adulthood. Behav Brain Res 220:91-9 CrossRef
  26. Mahler SV, de Wit H (2010) Cue-reactors: individual differences in cue-induced craving after food or smoking abstinence. PLoS One 5:e15475 CrossRef
  27. Meyer PJ, Lovic V, Saunders BT, Yager LM, Flagel SB, Morrow JD, Robinson TE (2012a) Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues. PLoS One 7:e38987 CrossRef
  28. Meyer PJ, Ma ST, Robinson TE (2012b) A cocaine cue is more preferred and evokes more frequency-modulated 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 219:999-009 CrossRef
  29. National Research Council (US) Committee on Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research (2003) Guideline for the care and use of mammals in neuroscience and behavioral research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
  30. Olsen CM, Winder DG (2009) Operant sensation seeking engages similar neural substrates to operant drug seeking in C57 mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:1685-694 CrossRef
  31. Parkinson JA, Olmstead MC, Burns LH, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1999) Dissociation in effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core and shell on appetitive Pavlovian approach behavior and the potentiation of conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity by D-amphetamine. J Neurosci 19:2401-411
  32. Peterson GB, Ackil JE, Frommer GP, Hearst ES (1972) Conditioned approach and contact behavior toward signals for food or brain-stimulation reinforcement. Science 177:1009-011 CrossRef
  33. Rescorla RA (1988) Pavlovian conditioning—it’s not what you think it is. Am Psychol 43:151-60 CrossRef
  34. Robinson TE, Flagel SB (2009) Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences. Biol Psychiatry 65:869-73 CrossRef
  35. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2010) A cocaine cue acts as an incentive stimulus in some but not others: implications for addiction. Biol Psychiatry 67:730-36 CrossRef
  36. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2011) Individual variation in the motivational properties of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:1668-676 CrossRef
  37. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2012) The role of dopamine in the accumbens core in the expression of Pavlovian-conditioned responses. Eur J Neurosci 36:2521-532
  38. Schachter S (1968) Obesity and eating—internal and external cues differentially affect eating behavior of obese and normal subjects. Science 161:751-56 CrossRef
  39. See RE (2005) Neural substrates of cocaine–cue associations that trigger relapse. Eur J Pharmacol 526:140-46 CrossRef
  40. Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, de Wit H, Stewart J (2003) The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168:3-0 CrossRef
  41. Sokolov EN (1963) Perception and the conditioned reflex. Pergamon Press, New York
  42. Stewart J (1960) Reinforcing effects of light as a function of intensity and reinforcement schedule. J Comp Physiol Psychol 53:187-93 CrossRef
  43. Thomas KL, Everitt BJ (2001) Limbic-cortical-ventral striatal activation during retrieval of a discrete cocaine-associated stimulus: a cellular imaging study with gamma protein kinase C expression. J Neurosci 21:2526-535
  44. Thomas KL, Arroyo M, Everitt BJ (2003) Induction of the learning and plasticity-associated gene Zif268 following exposure to a discrete cocaine-associated stimulus. Eur J Neurosci 17:1964-972 CrossRef
  45. Tomie A, Aguado AS, Pohorecky LA, Benjamin D (2000) Individual differences in Pavlovian autoshaping of lever pressing in rats predict stress-induced corticosterone release and mesolimbic levels of monoamines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:509-17 CrossRef
  46. Uslaner JM, Acerbo MJ, Jones SA, Robinson TE (2006) The attribution of incentive salience to a stimulus that signals an intravenous injection of cocaine. Behav Brain Res 169:320-24 CrossRef
  47. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer, New York
  48. Yager LM, Robinson TE (2010) Cue-induced reinstatement of food seeking in rats that differ in their propensity to attribute incentive salience to food cues. Behav Brain Res 214:30-4 CrossRef
  49. Zener K (1937) The significance of behavior accompanying conditioned salivary secretion for theories of the conditioned response. Am J Psychol 50:384-03 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Lindsay M. Yager (1)
  Terry E. Robinson (1)
  
  1. Department of Psychology (Biopsychology Program), The University of Michigan, 530 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
  
• ISSN：1432-2072

文摘

Rationale Cues associated with rewards bias attention towards them and can motivate drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior. There is, however, considerable individual variation in the extent to which cues associated with rewards acquire motivational properties. For example, only in some rats does a localizable food cue become attractive, eliciting approach towards it, and “wanted- in the sense that it serves as an effective conditioned reinforcer. Objectives We asked whether the propensity of animals to attribute incentive salience to a food cue predicts the extent to which a classically conditioned cocaine cue acquires incentive motivational properties. Methods First, a Pavlovian conditioned approach procedure was used to identify rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue. We then measured the extent to which a classically conditioned cocaine cue acquired two properties of an incentive stimulus: (1) the ability to elicit approach towards it, and (2) the ability to reinstate drug-seeking behavior, using an extinction-reinstatement procedure (i.e., to act as a conditioned reinforcer). Results We found that a classically conditioned cocaine cue became more attractive, in that it elicited greater approach toward it, and more desired, in that it supported more drug-seeking behavior under extinction conditions, in individuals prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue. Conclusions We conclude that rats vary in their propensity to attribute incentive salience to both food and cocaine cues, and it is possible to predict, prior to any drug experience, in which rats a cocaine cue will acquire the strongest motivational control over behavior.