Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty and movement outcomes in discrete and continuous fitts' tapping

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Sushma Alphonsa ; Boyi Dai ; Tami Benham-Deal ; Qin Zhu
• 刊名：Psychological Research
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：January 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：80
• 期：1
• 页码：55-68
• 全文大小：781 KB
• 参考文献：Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5(6), 679–685.PubMed CrossRef
  Bootsma, R. J., Fernandez, L., & Mottet, D. (2004). Behind Fitts’ law: kinematic patterns in goal-directed movements. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(6), 811–821.CrossRef
  Brenner, E., & van Damme, W. J. (1999). Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Research, 39(5), 975–986.PubMed CrossRef
  Button, C., Bennett, S., & Davids, K. (1998). Coordination dynamics of rhythmical and discrete prehension movements: Implications of the scanning procedure and individual differences. Human Movement Science, 17(6), 801–820.CrossRef
  Cañal-Bruland, R., Voorwald, F., Wielaard, K., & van der Kamp, J. (2013). Dissociations between vision for perception and vision for action depend on the relative availability of egocentric and allocentric information. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(6), 1206–1214.CrossRef
  Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.PubMed CrossRef
  Franz, V. H., Fahle, M., Bülthoff, H. H., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2001). Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(5), 1124–1144.PubMed
  Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11(1), 20–25.PubMed CrossRef
  Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Daprati, E., Saetti, M. C., & Toni, I. (1996). Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia, 34(5), 369–376.PubMed CrossRef
  Glover, S. (2002). Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(7), 288–292.PubMed CrossRef
  Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2001a). Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 560–572.PubMed
  Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2001b). Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 137(2), 254–258.PubMed CrossRef
  Gogel, W. C., & Tietz, J. D. (1973). Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency. Perception and Psychophysics, 13(2), 284–292.CrossRef
  Goodale, M. A., Meenan, J. P., Bülthoff, H. H., Nicolle, D. A., Murphy, K. J., & Racicot, C. I. (1994). Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4(7), 604–610.PubMed CrossRef
  Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25.PubMed CrossRef
  Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349(6305), 154–156.PubMed CrossRef
  Guiard, Y. (1993). On Fitts’s and Hooke’s laws: Simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. Acta Psychologica, 82(1), 139–159.PubMed CrossRef
  Guiard, Y. (1997). Fitts’ law in the discrete vs. cyclical paradigm. Human Movement Science, 16(1), 97–131.CrossRef
  Hochberg, J. E., & McAlister, E. (1955). Relative size vs. familiar size in the perception of represented depth. The American Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 294–296.PubMed CrossRef
  Meegan, D. V., Glazebrook, C. M., Dhillon, V. P., Tremblay, L., Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2004). The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Experimental Brain Research, 155(1), 37–47.PubMed CrossRef
  Morrison, J. D., & Whiteside, T. C. D. (1984). Binocular cues in the perception of distance of a point source of light. Perception, 13(5), 555–566.PubMed CrossRef
  Nemati, F. (2009). Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Muller-Lyer and Titchener configurations. Perception, 38(11), 1585–1600.PubMed CrossRef
  Revett, K. (2008). Behavioral biometrics: a remote access approach. New york: Wiley.CrossRef
  Roberts, B., Harris, M. G., & Yates, T. A. (2005). The roles of inducer size and distance in the Ebbinghaus illusion (Titchener circles). Perception, 34(7), 847–856.PubMed CrossRef
  Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T, Jr. (1979). Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86(5), 415–451.CrossRef
  Smeets, J. B., & Brenner, E. (2006). 10 years of illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1501–1504.PubMed
  van Donkelaar, P. (1999). Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Experimental Brain Research, 125(4), 517–520.PubMed CrossRef
  Viguier, A., Clement, G., & Trotter, Y. (2001). Distance perception within near visual space. Perception, 30(1), 115–124.PubMed CrossRef
  Wing, A. M., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception and Psychophysics, 13(3), 455–460.CrossRef
  Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., & Proffitt, D. R. (2012). Get me out of this slump! Visual illusions improve sports performance. Psychological Science, 23(4), 397–399.PubMed CrossRef
  Woodworth, R. S. (1899). Accuracy of voluntary movement. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 3(3), i.
  Zelaznik, H. N., & Lantero, D. (1996). The role of vision in repetitive circle drawing. Acta Psychologica, 92(1), 105–118.PubMed CrossRef
  Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 575–588.PubMed
  
• 作者单位：Sushma Alphonsa (1) (2)
  Boyi Dai (1)
  Tami Benham-Deal (1)
  Qin Zhu (1)
  
  1. Division of Kinesiology and Health, University of Wyoming, 1000 East University Avenue, Laramie, 82071, Wyoming, USA
  2. Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Utah State University, 2865 Old Main Hill, Logan, Utah, 84322, USA
  
• 刊物类别：Behavioral Science
• 刊物主题：Psychology
  Psychology
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1430-2772

文摘

The speed-accuracy trade-off is a fundamental movement problem that has been extensively investigated. It has been established that the speed at which one can move to tap targets depends on how large the targets are and how far they are apart. These spatial properties of the targets can be quantified by the index of difficulty (ID). Two visual illusions are known to affect the perception of target size and movement amplitude: the Ebbinghaus illusion and Muller-Lyer illusion. We created visual images that combined these two visual illusions to manipulate the perceived ID, and then examined people’s visual perception of the targets in illusory context as well as their performance in tapping those targets in both discrete and continuous manners. The findings revealed that the combined visual illusions affected the perceived ID similarly in both discrete and continuous judgment conditions. However, the movement outcomes were affected by the combined visual illusions according to the tapping mode. In discrete tapping, the combined visual illusions affected both movement accuracy and movement amplitude such that the effective ID resembled the perceived ID. In continuous tapping, none of the movement outcomes were affected by the combined visual illusions. Participants tapped the targets with higher speed and accuracy in all visual conditions. Based on these findings, we concluded that distinct visual-motor control mechanisms were responsible for execution of discrete and continuous Fitts’ tapping. Although discrete tapping relies on allocentric information (object-centered) to plan for action, continuous tapping relies on egocentric information (self-centered) to control for action. The planning-control model for rapid aiming movements is supported.