Multicenter surgical experience evaluation on the Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Dzemal Gazibegovic ; Eva M. Bero
• 关键词：Cochlear implant ; Pre ; curved electrode ; Mid ; Scala ; Insertion tool ; Survey ; Round window
• 刊名：European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：February 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：274
• 期：2
• 页码：1147-1151
• 全文大小：
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Otorhinolaryngology; Neurosurgery; Head and Neck Surgery;
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：1434-4726
• 卷排序：274

文摘

The HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode is intended to improve hearing for individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss by providing extended electrical coverage of the cochlea while minimizing trauma related to insertion. The electrode is appropriate for use with a wide range of surgical techniques, including either a cochleostomy or round window insertion, and the use of either a free-hand or tool-assisted approach. The objective of this survey was to evaluate how the HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools was used across a population of cochlear implant recipients of differing ages, audiologic profiles, and anatomical characteristics. The intent was to understand the type and frequency of surgical techniques applicable with the electrode, and to provide guidelines for clinical practice. Two questionnaires were completed by surgeons at implant centres located in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Before any surgeries were conducted, surgeons completed a questionnaire that assessed their overall cochlear implant surgical practice and preferences. Following each HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode insertion, surgeons completed a questionnaire that summarized their experience during that surgical procedure. Questionnaires were completed by 32 surgeons from 16 centres for a total of 143 surgeries (112 adults, 31 children). Most surgeons (62 %) preferred to insert the electrode via the round window or an extended round window compared with a cochleostomy (16 %), whereas the remaining 22 % indicated that they made an insertion choice based on presenting anatomy. Sixty-nine percent preferred a free-hand approach over using insertion tools. In 32 procedures, surgeons elected to deviate from an intended round window insertion to either an extended round window or cochleostomy approach.