Selling the Farm Silver? Understanding Water Sales to the Australian Government
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:S. Wheeler (1) sarah.wheeler@unisa.edu.au
    A. Zuo (1)
    H. Bjornlund (12)
    C. Lane Miller (1)
  • 关键词:Water entitlements – ; Environmental water sales – ; Murray ; Darling Basin ; Irrigators
  • 刊名:Environmental and Resource Economics
  • 出版年:2012
  • 出版时间:May 2012
  • 年:2012
  • 卷:52
  • 期:1
  • 页码:133-154
  • 全文大小:304.7 KB
  • 参考文献:1. ACCC (2011) Water monitoring report 2009–2010. Available at http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/985068
    2. Bjornlund H (2004) Formal and informal water markets—drivers of sustainable rural communities?. Water Resour Res 40: W09S07
    3. Chen C (2009) Factors influencing participation of ‘top-down but voluntary’ fishery management—empirical evidence from Taiwan. Mar Policy 34: 150–155
    4. Crase L, O’Keefe S (2009) The paradox of national water savings: a critique of ‘Water for the Future’. Agenda 16: 45–60
    5. Crase L, O’Keefe S, Dollery B (2011) Presumptions of linearity and faith in the power of centralised decision-marking: two challenges to the efficient management of environmental water in Australia. In: Western economic association international’s Pacific rim conference, QUT, Brisbane, April 26–29, 2011
    6. DEWHA (2008) Review of the 2007–2008 water entitlement purchases. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, September 24, 2008
    7. DSEWPC (2011) Progress of water recovery under the restoring the balance in the Murray-Darling Basin program. Available online: http://www.environment.gov.au/water/policy-programs/entitlement-purchasing/2008-09.html. Last Accessed 28 June 2011
    8. Edwards J, Cheers B, Bjornlund H (2008) Social economic and community impacts of water markets in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin region. Int J Interdiscipl Soc Sci 2: 1–10
    9. Fenton M (2006) The social implications of permanent water trading in the Loddon-Campaspe irrigation region of Northern Victoria. Report Prepared for North Central Catchment Management Authority, May, 2006
    10. GMW (2008) 2007/2008 Goulburn-Murray water annual report. Available online: http://www.g-mwater.com.au/downloads/Annual_Reports/G_MW_2007_08_Annual_Report_LR.pdf. Last Accessed 20 June 2010
    11. Grafton RQ (2011) Economic costs and benefits of the proposed basin plan. In: Connell D, Grafton RQ (eds) Basin futures: water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin. Griffin Press, Canberra
    12. Greene W (2008) Econometric analysis. Pearson Education Inc, New Jersey
    13. Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
    14. Ise S, Sunding D (1998) Reallocating water from agriculture to the environment under a voluntary purchase program. Rev Agri Econ 20: 214–226
    15. Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler R (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase Theorem. J Polit Econ 98: 1325–1348
    16. Kaiser H (1974) An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36
    17. Kitts A, Thunberg E, Robertson J (2001) Willingness to participate and bids in a fishing vessel buyout program: a case study of New England Groundfish. Mar Resour Econ 15: 221–232
    18. Kuehne G, Bjornlund H, Loch A (2010) Why do farmers make Non-profit decisions— investigating decisions made during drought. RIRDC Publication No 10/075. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra
    19. Maybery D, Crase L, Gullifer C (2005) Categorising farming values as economic, conservation and lifestyle. J Econ Psychol 26: 59–72
    20. (2010) Guide to the proposed basin plan, volume 1: overview. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra
    21. Morrison M, Durante G, Greig J, Ward J, Oczkowski E (2011) Segmenting landholders for improving the targeting of natural resource management expenditures. J Environ Plann Man (forthcoming)
    22. (2011) Australian water markets: trends and drivers 2007–2008 to 2009–2010. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
    23. Raftery A (1996) Bayesian model selection in social research. In: Marsden PV (ed) Sociological methodology, vol 26. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 111–163
    24. Stevens J (2002) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 4th edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
    25. Thampapillai V (2009a) Limits of market-based water governance for environmental flows in the Murray Darling Basin—part 1. Environ Policy Law 39: 247–265
    26. Thampapillai V (2009b) Limits of market-based water governance for environmental flows in the Murray Darling basin—part 2. Environ Policy Law 39: 317–322
    27. Thomson G (1951) The factorial analysis of human ability. University of London Press, London
    28. Walpole S, Enders G, Roe M (2010) The living Murray NSW market purchase measure: a survey of participants in permanent water trading for the environment. Contributed paper to the Australian agricultural & resource economics society’s 54th annual conference, Adelaide, February 10–12, 2010
    29. Wheeler S, Bjornlund H, Shanahan M, Zuo A (2009) Who trades water allocations? Evidence of the characteristics of early adopters in the Goulburn-Murray Irrigation District, Australia 1998–1999. Agri Econ 40: 631–643
    30. Wheeler S, Bjornlund H, Zuo A, Shanahan M (2010) The changing profile of water traders in the Goulburn-Murray Irrigation District, Australia. Agr Water Manage 97: 1333–1343
    31. Wheeler S, Garrick D, Loch A, Bjornlund H (2011) Incorporating temporary trade with the buy-back of water entitlements in Australia. Centre for Water Economics, Environment & Policy, ANU, Canberra
    32. Whitehead J, Pattanayak S, Van Houtven G, Gelso B (2008) Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessment of the state of the science. J Econ Surveys 22: 872–908
    33. Wilson A (1976) Multivariate analysis: data reduction and treatment evaluation. Brit J Psychiat 128: 404–407
  • 作者单位:1. CRMA, School of Commerce, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia2. Economics Department, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
  • 刊物类别:Business and Economics
  • 刊物主题:Economics
    Environmental Economics
    Economic Policy
    Economics
    Environmental Management
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1573-1502
文摘
In 2007–2008 the Australian federal government committed $3.1 billion over 10 years to purchase water from irrigators in the Murray-Darling Basin and to deliver this water to key environmental assets. Given that water entitlements often represent one of the most valuable assets owned by irrigators, this study investigates irrigators’ willingness to sell water, and their actual water sales, to the government. It uses 1,570 surveys from 2008–2009 and 2010–2011 in the southern Murray-Darling Basin. Water sales can be classified as either last resort or strategic. Overall, the results suggest that farmers who do not hold strong traditional farming attitudes, and have higher debt, lower farm income, larger high security water entitlements, lower water allocations over the past 5 years, and those who have been net sellers of water allocations are more likely to have sold water or are thinking of selling water to the government. A dynamic comparison of how water sale preferences change, and an estimate of the total amount of water entitlements irrigators are willing to sell, indicates that it is probable that there will be enough water offered to the program in the future, at least to meet initial minimum environmental water targets. However, other concerns indicate that a potential restructure of the program may be required.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700