Design of a process evaluation of the implementation of a physical activity and sports stimulation programme in Dutch rehabilitation setting: ReSpAct
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Femke Hoekstra (1) (2)
Roelina A Alingh (1) (2)
Cees P van der Schans (2) (4)
Florentina J Hettinga (5)
Marjo Duijf (6)
Rienk Dekker (2) (3)
Lucas HV van der Woude (1) (2)
1. University of Groningen ; University Medical Center Groningen ; Center for Human Movement Sciences ; Groningen ; The Netherlands
2. University Medical Center Groningen ; Center for Rehabilitation ; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine ; Groningen ; The Netherlands
4. Hanze University of Applied Sciences ; Research and Innovation Group in Health Care and Nursing ; Groningen ; The Netherlands
5. University of Essex ; School of Biological Sciences ; Centre of Sport and Exercise Science ; Colchester ; UK
6. Stichting Onbeperkt Sportief ; Bunnik ; The Netherlands
3. University Medical Center Groningen ; Center for Sports Medicine ; Groningen ; The Netherlands - 关键词：Implementation ; Dissemination ; Rehabilitation ; Physical activity ; Active lifestyle ; Process evaluation ; Disability ; Chronic disease ; Health promotion
- 刊名：Implementation Science
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：December 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：9
- 期：1
- 全文大小：526 KB
- 参考文献：1. Heath, GW, Parra, DC, Sarmiento, OL, Andersen, LB, Owen, N, Goenka, S, Montes, F, Brownson, RC (2012) Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet 380: pp. 272-281 2)60816-2" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
2. Morris, JH, Macgillivray, S, McFarlane, S (2014) Interventions to promote long-term participation in physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95: pp. 956-967 2013.12.016" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
3. Rabin, BA, Brownson, RC, Kerner, JF, Glasgow, RE (2006) Methodologic challenges in disseminating evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med 31: pp. S24-S34 2006.06.009" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
4. Rimmer, JH, Marques, AC (2012) Physical activity for people with disabilities. Lancet 380: pp. 193-195 2)61028-9" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
5. Matthews, L, Kirk, A, Macmillan, F, Mutrie, N (2014) Can physical activity interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes be translated into practice settings? A systematic review using the RE-AIM framework. Transl Behav Med 4: pp. 60-78 2-013-0235-y" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
6. Sallis, JF, Owen, N, Fotheringham, MJ (2000) Behavioral epidemiology: a systematic framework to classify phases of research on health promotion and disease prevention. Ann Behav Med 22: pp. 294-298 2895665" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
7. Glasgow, RE, Vogt, TM, Boles, SM (1999) Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 89: pp. 1322-1327 2105/AJPH.89.9.1322" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
8. Grol, RW, Wensing, M (2006) Implementatie: Effectieve Verbetering van de Pati毛ntenzorg. Elsevier Gezondheidszorg, Maarsen
9. Rogers, EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York
10. Fleuren, M, Wiefferink, K, Paulussen, T (2004) Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. Int J Qual Health Care 16: pp. 107-123 CrossRef
11. Huijg JM, Crone MR, Verheijden MW, van der Zouwe N, Middelkoop BJ, Gebhardt WA: Factors influencing the adoption, implementation, and continuation of physical activity interventions in primary health care: a Delphi study. / BMC Fam Pract 2013, 14:142.
12. Durlak, JA, DuPre, EP (2008) Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol 41: pp. 327-350 CrossRef
13. Steckler, A, Linnan, L (2002) Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. CA: Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
14. Wierenga D, Engbers LH, Van Empelen P, Duijts S, Hildebrandt VH, Van Mechelen W: What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review. / BMC Public Health 2013, 13:1190.
15. Rimmer, JH (2012) Getting beyond the plateau: bridging the gap between rehabilitation and community-based exercise. PM R 4: pp. 857-861 2012.08.008" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
16. Ploeg, HP, Streppel, KR, Beek, AJ, Woude, LH, Vollenbroek-Hutten, MM, Harten, WH, Mechelen, W (2006) Counselling increases physical activity behaviour nine weeks after rehabilitation. Br J Sports Med 40: pp. 223-229 2005.021139" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
17. Ploeg, HP, Streppel, KR, Beek, AJ, Woude, LH, Vollenbroek-Hutten, MM, Harten, WH, Mechelen, W (2007) Successfully improving physical activity behavior after rehabilitation. Am J Health Promot 21: pp. 153-159 278/0890-1171-21.3.153" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
18. Alingh, RA, Hoekstra, F, Schans, CP, Hettinga, FJ, Dekker, R, Woude, LHV (2014) ReSpAct: a dose-respons study into a person-tailored physical activity and sports stimulation program for patients. Rehabilitation: Mobility, Exercise & Sports. Wenckebach Instituut, Groningen
19. Guldbrandsson, K (2008) From news to everyday use. The difficult art of implementation. Book From News to Everyday use. The Difficult art of Implementation. Swedish National Institute of Public Health, City
20. Wandersman, A, Duffy, J, Flaspohler, P, Noonan, R, Lubell, K, Stillman, L, Blachman, M, Dunville, R, Saul, J (2008) Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol 41: pp. 171-181 CrossRef
21. Miller, WR (2013) RS: motivational interviewing: helping people change, third edition edn. The Guilford Press, New York
22. Ploeg, HP, Beek, AJ, Woude, LH, Mechelen, W (2004) Physical activity for people with a disability: a conceptual model. Sports Med 34: pp. 639-649 2165/00007256-200434100-00002" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
23. Rehabilitation, sports and exercise. www.onbeperktsportief.nl/rsb.
24. ReSpAct: rehabiliation, sports and active lifestyle. www.respact.nl.
25. Schijvens, L, Alingh, RA, Duijf, M, Hoekstra, F, Leutscher, H (2014) Handboek Revalidatie, Sport en Bewegen. Stichting Onbeperkt Sportief, Bunnik
26. Wierenga D, Engbers LH, van Empelen P, Hildebrandt VH, van Mechelen W: The design of a real-time formative evaluation of the implementation process of lifestyle interventions at two worksites using a 7-step strategy (BRAVO@Work). / BMC Public Health 2012, 12:619.
27. Hays, RD, Morales, LS (2001) The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med 33: pp. 350-357 2089" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
28. Hays, RD, Sherbourne, CD, Mazel, RM (1993) The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 2: pp. 217-227 2/hec.4730020305" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
29. VanderZee, KI, Sanderman, R, Heyink, JW, Haes, H (1996) Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status. Int J Behav Med 3: pp. 104-122 207/s15327558ijbm0302_2" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
30. Wendel-Vos, GC, Schuit, AJ, Saris, WH, Kromhout, D (2003) Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol 56: pp. 1163-1169 220-8" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
31. Braun VaC, V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3: pp. 77-101 CrossRef
32. Estabrooks, PA, Glasgow, RE (2006) Translating effective clinic-based physical activity interventions into practice. Am J Prev Med 31: pp. S45-S56 2006.06.019" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
33. Saunders, RP, Evans, MH, Joshi, P (2005) Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract 6: pp. 134-147 24839904273387" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
34. Nederland, R (2011) Brancherapport revalidatie 2010. Book Brancherapport Revalidatie 2010. Revalidatie Nederland, City
35. Green, J, Thorogood, N (2013) Qualitative Methods for Health Research. Sage Publications Ltd, London
36. Mays, N, Pope, C (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 320: pp. 50-52 20.7226.50" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef - 刊物主题：Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Health Administration; Health Informatics;
- 出版者：BioMed Central
- ISSN：1748-5908
文摘
Background There is a growing interest to study the transfer of evidence-based information into daily practice. The evidence-based programme Rehabilitation, Sports and Exercise (RSE) that aims to stimulate an active lifestyle during and after a rehabilitation period in people with a disability and/or chronic disease is prepared for nationwide dissemination. So far, however, little is known about the implementation of a new programme to stimulate physical activity in people with a disability in a rehabilitation setting. Therefore, a process evaluation of the implementation of the RSE programme within 18 Dutch rehabilitation centres and hospitals is performed in order to gain more insight into the implementation process itself and factors that facilitate or hamper the implementation process. This paper describes the study design of this process evaluation. Methods During a three-year period, the adoption, implementation and continuation of the RSE programme is monitored and evaluated in 12 rehabilitation centres and 6 hospitals with a rehabilitation department in The Netherlands. The main process outcomes are: recruitment, reach, dose delivered, dose received, fidelity, satisfaction, maintenance and context. The process outcomes are evaluated at different levels (organisational and patient) and different time points. Data collection includes both quantitative (online registration system and questionnaires) and qualitative (focus groups and semi-structured interviews) methods. Discussion The nationwide dissemination of an evidence-based programme to stimulate physical activity and sports during and after a rehabilitation period is extensively monitored and evaluated on different levels (organization and patients) using mixed methods. The study will contribute to the science of translating evidence-based programmes into daily practice of the rehabilitation care. The results of the study can be used to further optimize the content of the RSE programme and to facilitate the implementation in other health facilities. Furthermore, the results of the study can help future implementation processes in the rehabilitation setting. Trial registration The study is registered by The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR3961.