NGO Networks, the Diffusion and Adaptation of NGO Managerialism, and NGO Legitimacy in Latin America

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Susan Appe
• 关键词：NGO networks ; Managerialism ; Legitimacy ; Latin America ; Ecuador ; Bolivia
• 刊名：Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：27
• 期：1
• 页码：187-208
• 全文大小：461 KB
• 参考文献：Abramson, A. J., & McCarthy, R. (2012). Infrastructure organizations. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  Acosta, R. M. (2011). Cooperación actores locales y no estatales. (local and nonstate cooperation actors). Retrieved December 7, 2012, from http://​www.​dps.​gov.​co/​blogs/​blogInterna.​aspx?​blogID=​6 .
  Aportes Ciudadanos a las Regulaciones de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil del Ecuador. (2009). [Citizen Contributions to the Regulations of Civil Society Organizations] Quito, Ecuador. August 3, 2009.
  Appe, S. (2012). What about who is mapping and its implications? comments on brent never’s ‘The case for better maps of social service provision.’ VOLUNTAS, 23(1), 204–212.CrossRef
  Appe, S. (2013a). Deconstructing civil society ‘maps’ and their meanings. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 35(1), 63–80.CrossRef
  Appe, S. (2013b). A comparative case study of NGO umbrella organizations in Latin America. In Paper presented at the ARNOVA annual conference, November 22, 2013, Hartford, Connecticut.
  Appe, S. & Barragán, D. (2013). Strategies outside the formal classroom: Nonprofit management education in transparency and accountability. The case of ecuador. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(4), 591–614.
  Arias, A. (2011). Situación de la Transparencia y Rendición de Cuentas en las Organizaciones No Gubernamentales (ONG) del Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Centro Ecuatoriano de Derecho Ambiental (CEDA). [The situation of transparency and accountability of NGOs in Ecuador. Ecuadorian Center for Environmental Law—CEDA].
  Ashman, D., & Sugawata, C. L. (2013). Civil society networks: options for network design. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(3), 389–406.CrossRef
  Bies, A. L. (2010). Evolution of nonprofit self-regulation in Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(6), 1057–1086.CrossRef
  Bothwell, R. O. (2001). Trends in self-regulation and transparency of nonprofits in the U.S. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 2(3), 604–622.
  Brown, D. (1991). Bridging organizations and sustainable development. Human Relations, 44(8), 807–831.CrossRef
  Brown, D., & Kalegaonkar, A. (2002). Support organizations and the evolution of the NGO sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(2), 231–258.CrossRef
  Cairns, B., Harris, M., & Young, P. (2007). Building the capacity of the voluntary nonprofit sector: challenges of theory and practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9–10), 869–885.
  CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation. (2014). Accountability for civil society by civil society: A guide to self-regulation iniatitives. http://​civicus.​org/​index.​php/​en/​media-centre-129/​reports-and-publications/​2001-accountability-for-civil-society-by-civil-society-a-guide-to-self-regulation-initiatives . Accessed 23 Nov 2014.
  Collective of Civil Society Organizations of Ecuador. (2011). Informe de rendición colectiva de cuentas 2010 [report of collective accountability 2010]. Document on file with the author.
  Collective of Civil Society Organizations of Ecuador. (2012). Informe rendicion de cuentas 2011 [report of accountability 2011]. Retrieved from http://​rendircuentas.​org/​wp-content/​uploads/​2012/​10/​InformeOSC2011-1_​ecuador.​pdf . Accessed 24 Mar 2013.
  Corby, K., & Sowards, S. (2000). Authoring specialized web sites: The education book reviews web site. References Services Review, 28(1), 47–54.CrossRef
  Ebrahim, A. (2003a). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.CrossRef
  Ebrahim, A. (2003b). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191–212.CrossRef
  Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.CrossRef
  Estévez, L. (2011). Organizaciones de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana Piden a Gobiernos que no Promulgue Reglamento. Press Release.
  Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Loudon: Routledge.
  Garcés, M. F. (2010). Marco normativo para las organizaciones de la sociedad civil [Legal framework for civil society organizations]. Presentation given to the Collective of Civil Society Organizations at Citizen Participation, Quito, Ecuador.
  Gugerty, M. K. (2008). The effectiveness of NGO self-regulation: Theory and evidence from Africa. Public Administration & Development, 28(2), 105–118.CrossRef
  Human Rights Watch. (2006). Peru: NGO bill threatens human rights. Retrieved from http://​www.​hrw.​org/​en/​news/​2006/​11/​09/​peru-ngo-bill-threatens-human-rights?​print . Accessed 20 Nov 2010.
  ICNL. (2009). Barred from the debate: Restrictions on NGO public policy. Global Trends in NGO Law, 1(3), 1–12.
  Jordan, L., & van Tuijl, P. (2006). NGO accountability: politics, principles and innovations. London: Earthscan.
  Kaldor, M. (2003). Civil society and accountability. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 5–27.CrossRef
  Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2011). Managerialism and beyond: discourses of civil society organization and their governance implications. VOLUNTAS, 22(4), 731–754.CrossRef
  Marshall, J. H., & Suárez, D. (2014). The flow of management practices: An analysis of NGO monitoring and evaluation dynamics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(6), 1033–1051.CrossRef
  Meyer, M., Buber, R., & Aghamanoukjan, A. (2013). In search of legitimacy: managerialism and legitimation in civil society organizations. VOLUNTAS, 24(2), 167–193.CrossRef
  Monmonier, M. (2010). No dig, no fly, no go: How maps restrict and control. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRef
  Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14, 339–354.CrossRef
  Nickel, P. M., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2015). Knowing and governing: The mapping of the nonprofit and voluntary sector as statecraft. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. doi:10.​1007/​s11266-015-9552-8 .
  OSC Ecuador. (2011). Manifesto del colectivo de organizaciones de la sociedad civil (manifest of the collective of civil society organizations). Quito, Ecuador: OSC Ecuador.
  Prakash, A., & Gugerty, M. K. (2010). Trust but verify? Voluntary regulation programs in the nonprofit sector. Regulation & Governance, 4(1), 22–47.
  Regional Initiative. (2012). Manual de autoevaluacion: sobre las practicas de transparencia y rendicion de cuentas [Manual of self-evaluation: About the practices of transparency and accountability]. Retrieved January 20, 2013 from http://​rendircuentas.​org/​AplicacionRendir​Cuentas/​index.​html .
  Regional Initiative. (2013). Transparencia, accountability, legitimidad: Manual para organizaciones de la sociedad civil [Transparency, accountability, and legitimacy: Manual for civil society organizations]. Retrieved October 1, 2013 from http://​rendircuentas.​org/​AplicacionRendir​Cuentas/​index.​html .
  Roberts, S., Jones, P., & Frothling, O. (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism. World Development, 33(11), 1845–1864.CrossRef
  Romero, S. (2010). New laws in venezuela aim to limit dissent. New York Times. Retrieved December 24, 2010 from http://​www.​nytimes.​com/​2010/​12/​25/​world/​americas/​25venez.​html?​_​r=​1&​ref=​venezuela .
  Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2011). Accountability online: understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 270–295.CrossRef
  Sidel, M. (2005). The guardians guarding themselves: A comparative perspective on self-regulation. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 80, 803–835.
  Somos Mas. (2012). We’re more! Retrieved April 1, 2013 from http://​www.​somosmas.​org/​2012/​05/​presentacion-somos-mas/​ .
  Srinivas, N. (2009). Against NGOs?: A critical perspective on nongovernmental action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 614–626.CrossRef
  Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
  Tschirhart, M., & Bielefeld, W. (2012). Managing nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 59–76.CrossRef
  Wing, K. T. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of capacity-building initiatives: Seven issues for the field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 153–160.CrossRef
  Wong, W. (2012). Internal affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  Wood, D. (2010). Rethinking the power of maps. New York: The Guilford.
  Young, D. R. (1999). Complementary, supplementary or adversarial? A theoretical and historical examination of nonprofit-government relations in the U.S. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 31–67). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  Young, D. (2001). Organizational identity and the structure of nonprofit umbrella associations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 289–304.CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Susan Appe (1)
  
  1. Department of Public Administration, College of Community and Public Affairs, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 13901-3304, USA
  
• 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
• 刊物主题：Social Sciences
  Social Sciences
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-7888

文摘

Nongovernmental organization (NGO) networks have become key instruments used by NGOs in Latin America. Because these networks have important roles to play in advocating for the sector, earning public support, and improving the provision of public goods and services, understanding these networks is important to understanding the NGO sector more broadly. The article examines how NGO networks use collective texts to diffuse and adapt managerial practices. NGO networks use elements of managerialism and their adaptations to signal quality, secure recognition in social development, identify strengths and weaknesses of the sector, and define civil society in order to garner sector legitimacy. While looking at managerialism from a critical perspective, the article finds that understanding NGOs networks and the diffusion and adaption of NGO practices can further pinpoint effective sources of sector legitimacy and help to strengthen the sector’s role in social development. Keywords NGO networks Managerialism Legitimacy Latin America Ecuador Bolivia