Postoperative complications following single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis in 360 consecutive patients
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Norihiro Sato ; Kazunori Shibao ; Yasuhisa Mori ; Aiichiro Higure…
  • 关键词:Single ; incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ; Postoperative complication ; Wound complication ; Bile duct injury ; Acute cholecystitis ; Physical status
  • 刊名:Surgical Endoscopy
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:March 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:29
  • 期:3
  • 页码:708-713
  • 全文大小:304 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(5):695 CrossRef
    2. Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 9(4):361-64 CrossRef
    3. Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 75(8):681-85 discussion 5-6
    4. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P et al (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24(8):1842-848 CrossRef
    5. Cao ZG, Cai W, Qin MF, Zhao HZ, Yue P, Li Y (2011) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 21(5):311-13 CrossRef
    6. Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P et al (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201(3):369-72 discussion 72-3 CrossRef
    7. Garg P, Thakur JD, Garg M, Menon GR (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 16(8):1618-628 CrossRef
    8. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26(5):1205-213 CrossRef
    9. Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G et al (2012) Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26(5):1296-303 CrossRef
    10. Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, Guarino S, Santoro A, Parisi A et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100(2):191-08 CrossRef
    11. Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F, Passera R, Morino M (2013) Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(7):2293-304 CrossRef
    12. Geng L, Sun C, Bai J (2013) Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 8(10):e76530 CrossRef
    13. Leung D, Yetasook AK, Carbray J, Butt Z, Hoeger Y, Denham W et al (2012) Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg 215(5):702-08 CrossRef
    14. Zapf M, Yetasook A, Leung D, Salabat R, Denham W, Barrera E et al (2013) Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients. Surgery 154(4):662-70 discussion 70-1
文摘
Background Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is being increasingly performed based on recent evidence showing its cosmetic advantages. However, there is limited information on outcome data for SILC with respect to postoperative complications. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 360 patients undergoing SILC to evaluate the rate, features, and risk factors of postoperative complications. Results During a median follow-up period of 671?days, 17 patients (4.7?%) developed postoperative complications, including bile duct injuries, intraabdominal abscess, wound infection, incisional hernia, paralytic ileus, and pneumonia. Reoperation was required in five patients (1.4?%). Overall inpatient mortality occurred in one patient (0.3?%) who developed aspiration pneumonia. In multivariate stepwise regression analyses, poor physical status (American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ?/strong>3) and preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were identified as significant risk factors for the development of postoperative complications (P?=?0.0009 and P?=?0.04, respectively). Conclusions These findings suggest that SILC is a relatively safe procedure with an acceptable postoperative complication rate but requires careful attention especially in patients with poor physical status and/or acute cholecystitis.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700