Effects of Contralateral Acoustic Stimulation on Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions and Hearing Threshold Fine Structure
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：James B. Dewey (1)
Jungmee Lee (1)
Sumitrajit Dhar (1) (2) - 关键词：threshold fine structure ; spontaneous otoacoustic emissions ; medial olivocochlear system ; contralateral acoustic stimulation
- 刊名：JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：December 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：15
- 期：6
- 页码：897-914
- 全文大小：1,110 KB
- 参考文献：1. Abdala C, Mishra SK, Williams TL (2009) Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1584鈥?594 CrossRef
2. Aguilar E, Eustaquio-Mart铆n A, Lopez-Poveda EA (2013) Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 14:341鈥?57 CrossRef
3. Bergevin C, Fulcher A, Richmond S, Velenovsky D, Lee J (2012) Interrelationships between spontaneous and low-level stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 285:20鈥?8 CrossRef
4. Burns EM (2009) Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 125:3166鈥?176 CrossRef
5. Cody AR, Johnstone BM (1982) Temporary threshold shift modified by binaural acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 6:199鈥?05 CrossRef
6. Cohen MF (1982) Detection threshold microstructure and its effect on temporal integration data. J Acoust Soc Am 71:405鈥?09 CrossRef
7. Cooper NP, Guinan JJ (2003) Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity. J Phsyiol 548:307鈥?12 CrossRef
8. Davis H (1983) An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 9:79鈥?0 CrossRef
9. Deeter R, Abel R, Calandruccio L, Dhar S (2009) Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 126:2413鈥?424 CrossRef
10. Delano PH, Elgueda D, Hamame CM, Robles L (2007) Selective attention to visual stimuli reduces cochlear sensitivity in chinchillas. J Neurosci 27:4146鈥?153 CrossRef
11. Dieler R, Shehata-Dieler WE, Brownell WE (1991) Concomitant salicylate-induced alterations of outer hair cell subsurface cisternae and electromotility. J Neurocytol 20:637鈥?53 CrossRef
12. Dirks D, Malmquist C (1965) Shifts in air-conduction thresholds produced by pulsed and continuous contralateral masking. J Acoust Soc Am 37:631鈥?37 CrossRef
13. Dolan DF, Guo MH, Nuttall AL (1997) Frequency-dependent enhancement of basilar membrane velocity during olivocochlear bundle stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 102:3587鈥?596 CrossRef
14. Elliott E (1958) A ripple effect in the audiogram. Nature 181:1076 CrossRef
15. Epp B, Verhey JL, Mauermann M (2010) Modeling cochlear dynamics: interrelation between cochlea mechanics and psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 128:1870鈥?883 CrossRef
16. Francis NA, Guinan JJ (2010) Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: implications for cochlear filter bandwidths. Hear Res 267:36鈥?5 CrossRef
17. Furst M, Reshef I, Attias J (1992) Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: experiment and model. J Acoust Soc Am 91:1003鈥?014 CrossRef
18. Galambos R (1956) Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. J Neurophysiol 19:424鈥?37
19. Garinis A, Werner L, Abdala C (2011) The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold. Hear Res 282:128鈥?37 CrossRef
20. Gjaevenes K, Vigran E (1967) Contralateral masking: an attempt to determine the role of the aural reflex. J Acoust Soc Am 42:580鈥?85 CrossRef
21. Guinan JJ (1986) Effect of efferent neural activity on cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl 25:53鈥?2
22. Guinan JJ (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27:589鈥?07 CrossRef
23. Guinan JJ (2010) Cochlear efferent innervation and function. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 18:447鈥?53 CrossRef
24. Harrison WA, Burns EM (1993) Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2649鈥?658 CrossRef
25. Heise SJ, Mauermann M, Verhey JL (2009a) Threshold fine structure affects amplitude modulation perception. J Acoust Soc Am 125:EL33鈥揈L38 CrossRef
26. Heise SJ, Mauermann M, Verhey JL (2009b) Investigating possible mechanisms behind the effect of threshold fine structure on amplitude modulation perception. J Acoust Soc Am 126:2490鈥?500 CrossRef
27. Ingham JG (1957) The effect upon monaural sensitivity of continuous stimulation of the opposite ear. Q J Exp Psychol 9:52鈥?0 CrossRef
28. Ingham JG (1959) Variations in cross-masking with frequency. J Exp Psychol 58:199鈥?05 CrossRef
29. Jennings SG, Strickland EA (2012) Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am 132:2483鈥?496 CrossRef
30. Kapadia S, Lutman ME (1999) Reduced 鈥榓udiogram ripple鈥?in normally-hearing subjects with weak otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 38:257鈥?61 CrossRef
31. Kawase T, Liberman MC (1993) Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. J Neurophysiol 70:2519鈥?532
32. Kawase T, Delgutte B, Liberman MC (1993) Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones. J Neurophysiol 70:2533鈥?549
33. Kawase T, Ogura M, Hidaka H, Sasaki N, Suzuki Y, Takasaka T (2000) Effects of contralateral noise on measurement of the psychophysical tuning curve. Hear Res 142:63鈥?0 CrossRef
34. Kawase T, Ogura M, Sato T, Kobayashi T, Suzuki Y (2003) Effects of contralateral noise on the measurement of auditory threshold. Tohoku J Exp Med 200:129鈥?35 CrossRef
35. Kemp DT (1978) Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1386鈥?391 CrossRef
36. Kemp DT (1979a) The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure鈥攅vidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl:35鈥?7
37. Kemp DT (1979b) Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 224:37鈥?5 CrossRef
38. Kemp DT (1981) Physiologically active cochlear micromechanics-one source of tinnitus. In: Evered D, Lawrenson G (eds) Tinnitus - Ciba Foundation Symposium 85. Pitman, London, pp 54鈥?1
39. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (1997) Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: effects of chronic deefferentation and sham surgery. J Neurophysiol 78:3095鈥?106
40. Kulawiec JT, Orlando MS (1995) The contribution of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to the click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 16:515鈥?20 CrossRef
41. Lee J, Long G (2012) Stimulus characteristics which lessen the impact of threshold fine structure on estimates of hearing status. Hear Res 283:24鈥?2 CrossRef
42. Lee J, Dhar S, Abel R, Banakis R, Grolley E, Lee J, Zecker S, Siegel J (2012) Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration. Ear Hear 33:315鈥?29 CrossRef
43. Long GR (1984) The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds. Hear Res 15:73鈥?7 CrossRef
44. Long G (1998) Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones. Hear Res 119:49鈥?0 CrossRef
45. Long GR, Talmadge CL (1997) Spontaneous otoacoustic emission frequency is modulated by heartbeat. J Acoust Soc Am 102:2831鈥?848 CrossRef
46. Long G, Tubis A (1988a) Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 36:125鈥?38 CrossRef
47. Long G, Tubis A (1988b) Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J Acoust Soc Am 84:1343鈥?353 CrossRef
48. Long GR, Tubis A, Jones KL (1991) Modeling synchronization and suppression of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions using Van der Pol oscillators: effects of aspirin administration. J Acoust Soc Am 89:1201鈥?212 CrossRef
49. Maison SF, Usubuchi H, Liberman MC (2013) Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure. J Neurosci 33:5542鈥?552 CrossRef
50. Mauermann M, Long GR, Kollmeier B (2004) Fine structure of hearing threshold and loudness perception. J Acoust Soc Am 116:1066鈥?080 CrossRef
51. McFadden D, Mishra R (1993) On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 71:208鈥?13 CrossRef
52. Micheyl C, Carbonnel O, Collet L (1995a) Medial olivocochlear system and loudness adaptation: differences between musicians and non-musicians. Brain Cogn 29:127鈥?36 CrossRef
53. Micheyl C, Morlet T, Giraud AL, Collet L, Morgon A (1995b) Contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions and detection of a multi-tone complex in noise. Acta Otolaryngol 115:178鈥?82 CrossRef
54. Micheyl C, Perrot X, Collet L (1997) Relationship between auditory intensity discrimination in noise and olivocochlear efferent system activity in humans. Behav Neurosci 111:801鈥?07 CrossRef
55. Morand-Villeneuve N, Garnier S, Grimault N, Veuillet E, Collet L, Micheyl C (2002) Medial olivocochlear bundle activation and perceived auditory intensity in humans. Physiol Behav 77:311鈥?20 CrossRef
56. Mott JB, Norton SJ, Neely ST, Warr WB (1989) Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear. Hear Res 38:229鈥?42 CrossRef
57. Moulin A, Collet L, Veuillet E, Morgon A (1993) Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 65:216鈥?33 CrossRef
58. Mountain DC (1980) Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 210:71鈥?2 CrossRef
59. Murugasu E, Russell IJ (1996) The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J Neurosci 16:325鈥?32
60. Nieder P, Nieder I (1970a) Stimulation of efferent olivocochlear bundle causes release from low level masking. Nature 227:184鈥?85 CrossRef
61. Nieder P, Nieder I (1970b) Antimasking effect of crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation with loud clicks in guinea pig. Exp Neurol 28:179鈥?88 CrossRef
62. Norton SJ, Mott JB, Champlin CA (1989) Behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 38:243鈥?58 CrossRef
63. Nuttall AL, Grosh K, Zheng J, Boer E, Zou Y, Ren T (2004) Spontaneous basilar membrane oscillation and otoacoustic emission at 15 kHz in a guinea pig. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:337鈥?48 CrossRef
64. Powers NL, Salvi RJ, Wang J, Spongr V, Qiu CX (1995) Elevation of auditory thresholds by spontaneous cochlear oscillations. Nature 375:585鈥?87 CrossRef
65. Quaranta N, Scaringi A, Nahum S, Quaranta A (2005) Effects of efferent acoustic reflex activation on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans. Acta Otolaryngol 125:520鈥?23 CrossRef
66. Rajan R, Johnstone BM (1988) Electrical stimulation of cochlear efferents at the round window reduces auditory desensitization in guinea pigs. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters. Hear Res 36:53鈥?3 CrossRef
67. Robles L, Delano PH (2008) Efferent system. In: Dallos P, Oertel D (eds) The senses: a comprehensive reference. Academic Press, London, pp 413鈥?45
68. Scharf B, Magnan J, Chays A (1997) On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: 16 case studies. Hear Res 103:101鈥?22 CrossRef
69. Schloth E (1983) Relation between spectral composition of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and fine-structure of threshold in quiet. Acustica 53:250鈥?56
70. Schloth E, Zwicker E (1983) Mechanical and acoustical influences on spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions. Hear Res 11:285鈥?93 CrossRef
71. Shehata WE, Brownell WE, Dieler R (1991) Effects of salicylate on shape, electromotility and membrane characteristics of isolated outer hair cells from guinea pig cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 111:707鈥?18 CrossRef
72. Shera CA (2003) Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. J Acoust Soc Am 114:244鈥?62 CrossRef
73. Siegel JH, Kim DO (1982) Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear Res 6:171鈥?82 CrossRef
74. Smith DW, Turner DA, Henson MM (2000) Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in 鈥渃entral masking鈥?in nonhuman primates. J Acoust Soc Am 107:933鈥?41 CrossRef
75. Smurzynski J, Probst R (1998) The influence of disappearing and reappearing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on one subject鈥檚 threshold microstructure. Hear Res 115:197鈥?05 CrossRef
76. Sun XM (2008) Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression. J Acoust Soc Am 123:4310鈥?320 CrossRef
77. Talmadge CL, Tubis A, Long GR, Piskorski P (1998) Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. J Acoust Soc Am 104:1517鈥?543 CrossRef
78. Vinay MBCJ (2008) Effects of activation of the efferent system on psychophysical tuning curves as a function of signal frequency. Hear Res 240:93鈥?01 CrossRef
79. Ward WD (1961) Studies on the aural reflex. I. Contralateral remote masking as an indicator of reflex activity. J Acoust Soc Am 33:1034鈥?045 CrossRef
80. Wegel RL, Lane CE (1924) The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and its probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Phys Rev 23:266鈥?85 CrossRef
81. Wiederhold ML, Kiang NY (1970) Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 48:950鈥?65 CrossRef
82. Wilson JP (1980) Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus. Hear Res 2:233鈥?52 CrossRef
83. Wilson JP, Sutton GJ (1981) Acoustic correlates of tonal tinnitus. In: Evered D, Lawrenson G (eds) Tinnitus - Ciba Foundation Symposium 85. Pitman, London, pp 82鈥?07
84. Winslow RL, Sachs MB (1987) Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise. J Neurophysiol 57:1002鈥?021
85. Youngblood J, Martin FN (1981) On the relationship of stapedial contraction to central masking. J Aud Res 21:45鈥?9
86. Zhao W, Dhar S (2010) The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 11:53鈥?7 CrossRef
87. Zhao W, Dhar S (2011) Fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans. PLoS One 6:e18725 CrossRef
88. Zhao W, Dhar S (2012) Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans. J Neurophysiol 108:25鈥?0 CrossRef
89. Zurek PM (1981) Spontaneous narrowband acoustic signals emitted by human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 69:514鈥?23 CrossRef
90. Zwicker E (1986) Spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions, threshold in quiet, and just noticeable amplitude modulation at low levels. In: Moore BCJ, Patterson RD (eds) Auditory frequency selectivity. Plenum, New York, pp 49鈥?9 CrossRef
91. Zwicker E, Schloth E (1984) Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 75:1148鈥?154 CrossRef
92. Zwislocki J (1953) Acoustic attenuation between the ears. J Acoust Soc Am 25:752鈥?59 CrossRef
93. Zwislocki JJ (1972) A theory of central auditory masking and its partial validation. J Acoust Soc Am 52:644鈥?59 CrossRef
94. Zwislocki JJ, Damianopoulos EN, Buining E, Glantz J (1967) Central masking: some steady-state and transient effects. Percept Psychophys 2:59鈥?4 CrossRef - 作者单位：James B. Dewey (1)
Jungmee Lee (1)
Sumitrajit Dhar (1) (2)
1. Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA
2. Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA - ISSN：1438-7573
文摘
Medial olivocochlear (MOC) influence on cochlear mechanics can be noninvasively, albeit indirectly, explored via the effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) on otoacoustic emissions. CAS-mediated effects are particularly pronounced for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), which are typically reduced in amplitude and shifted upward in frequency by CAS. We investigated whether similar frequency shifts and magnitude reductions were observed behaviorally in the fine structure of pure-tone hearing thresholds, a phenomenon thought to share a common underlying mechanism with SOAEs. In normal-hearing listeners, fine-resolution thresholds were obtained over a narrow frequency range centered on the frequency of an SOAE, both in the absence and presence of 60-dB SPL broadband CAS. While CAS shifted threshold fine structure patterns and SOAEs upward in frequency by a comparable amount, little reduction in the presence or depth of fine structure was observed at frequencies near those of SOAEs. In fact, CAS typically improved thresholds, particularly at threshold minima, and increased fine structure depth when reductions in the amplitude of the associated SOAE were less than 10 dB. Additional measurements made at frequencies distant from SOAEs, or near SOAEs that were more dramatically reduced in amplitude by the CAS, revealed that CAS tended to elevate thresholds and reduce threshold fine structure depth. The results suggest that threshold fine structure is sensitive to MOC-mediated changes in cochlear gain, but that SOAEs complicate the interpretation of threshold measurements at nearby frequencies, perhaps due to masking or other interference effects. Both threshold fine structure and SOAEs may be significant sources of intersubject and intrasubject variability in psychoacoustic investigations of MOC function.