Enhanced Resistance of Pea Plants to Oxidative Stress Caused by Paraquat during Colonization by Aerobic Methylobacteria
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：N. V. Agafonova ; N. V. Doronina ; Yu. A. Trotsenko
- 关键词：aerobic methylobacteria ; pea ; paraquat ; oxidative stress ; enzymes ; pigments
- 刊名：Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：March 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：52
- 期：2
- 页码：199-204
- 全文大小：440 KB
- 参考文献：1.Pimentel, D., Peshin, R., and Dhawan, A.K., Pesticides and pest control, in Integrated Pest Management: Innovation-Development Process, Netherlands: Springer, 2009, pp. 83–87.CrossRef
2.Vercraene-Eairmal, M., Lauga, B., Saint, Laurent, S., Mazzella, N., Boutry, S., Simon, M., Karama, S., Delmas, F., and Duran, R., Chemosphere, 2010, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 837–843.CrossRef PubMed
3.Fuerst, P.E., Nakatani, H.Y., Dodge, A.D., Penner, D., and Arntzen, C.J., Plant. Physiol., 1985, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 984–989.CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
4.Mittler, R., Trends Plant Sci., 2002, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 405–410.CrossRef PubMed
5.Fedorov, D.N., Doronina, H.V., and Trotsenko, Yu.A., Microbiology (Moscow), 2011, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 443–454.CrossRef
6.Agafonova, N.V., Kaparullina, E.N., Doronina, N.V., and Trotsenko, Yu.A., Microbiology (Moscow), 2013, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 864–868.CrossRef
7.Doronina, N.V., Torgonskaya, M.L., Fedorov, D.N., and Trotsenko, Yu.A., Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2015, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 125–134.CrossRef
8.Pigoleva, S.V., Zakharchenko, N.S., Ermoshin, A.A., Chepurnova, M.A., and Bur’yanov, Ya.I., Izv. Tul’sk. Gos. Univ.: Estestv. Nauki, 2011, no. 3, pp. 210–210.
9.Murashige, T. and Skoog, F., Physiol. Plant., 1962, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 473–497.CrossRef
10.Gogleva, A.A., Kaparullina, E.N., Doronina, N.V., and Trotsenko, Y.A., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2010, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2623–2628.CrossRef PubMed
11.Gogleva, A.A., Kaparullina, E.N., Doronina, N.V., and Trotsenko, Y.A., Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 2011, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 477–481.CrossRef PubMed
12.Doronina, N.V., Kaparullina, E.N., Bykova, T.V., and Trotsenko, Y.A., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2013, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1847–1852.CrossRef PubMed
13.Agafonova, N.V., Kaparullina, E.N., Doronina, N.V., and Trotsenko, Yu.A., Microbiology (Moscow), 2015, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 544–552.CrossRef
14.Doronina, N.V., Kudinova, L.V., and Trotsenko, Yu.A., Microbiology (Moscow), 2000, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 599–603.CrossRef
15.Beers, R.E. and Sizer, J.W., J. Biol. Chem., 1952, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 133–140.PubMed
16.Pine, L., Hoffman, P.S., Malcolm, G.B., Benson, R.F., and Keen, M.G., J. Clinic. Microbiol., 1984, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 421–429.
17.Smirnova, L.P. and Kondakova, I.V., Biomed. Khim., 2004, vol. 50, pp. 566–575.PubMed
18.Bradford, M.M., Anal. Biochem., 1976, vol. 72, pp. 248–254.CrossRef PubMed
19.Velikova, V., Yordanov, I., and Edreva, A., Plant Sci., 2000, vol. 151, pp. 59–66.CrossRef
20.Costa, H., Gallego, S.M., and Tomaro, M.L., Plant Sci., 2002, vol. 162, pp. 939–945.CrossRef
21.Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., and Teare, I.D., Plant Soil, 1973, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 205–207.CrossRef
22.Kornilina, V.V., Fundament. Issled., 2012, no. 9, pp. 668–572.
23.Wintermans, J.F.G.M. and De Mots, A., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1965, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 448–453.CrossRef PubMed
24.Soshinkova, T.N., Radyukina, N.L., Korol’kova, D.V., and Nosov A.V, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2013, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 41–54.CrossRef
25.Kuznetsov, Vl.V. and Shevyakova, N.I., Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 1999, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 274–288.
26.Merzlayak, M.N. and Solovchenko, A.E., Plant Sci., 2002, vol. 163, pp. 881–888.CrossRef
27.Stahl, W. and Sies, H., Mol. Aspects Med., 2003, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 345–351.CrossRef PubMed
28.Shevyakova, N.I., Bakulina, E.A., and Kuznetsov, Vl.V., Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2009, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 663–669.CrossRef
29.Sharma, P., Jha, A.B., Dubey, R.Sh., and Perrasakli, M., J. Bot., 2012, vol. 2012, Article ID 217037.
30.Karavaev, V.A., Baulin, A.M., Gordienko, T.V., Dovyd’kov, S.A., and Tikhonov, A.N., Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2001, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 38–44.CrossRef
31.Gavrilenko, V.F., Bol’shoi praktikum po fotosintezu (Extended Practical Course in Biochemistry), Moscow: Izdat. tsentr “Akademiya,” 2003. - 作者单位：N. V. Agafonova (1)
N. V. Doronina (2)
Yu. A. Trotsenko (2)
1. Pushchino State Institute of Natural Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow oblast, 142290, Russia
2. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow oblast, 142290, Russia - 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
- 刊物主题：Life Sciences
Biochemistry
Microbiology
Medical Microbiology
Russian Library of Science - 出版者：MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica distributed exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media LLC.
- ISSN：1608-3024
文摘
The influence of colonization of the pea (Pisum sativum L.) by aerobic methylobacteria of five different species (Methylophilus flavus Ship, Methylobacterium extorquens G10, Methylobacillus arboreus Iva, Methylopila musalis MUSA, Methylopila turkiensis Side1) on plant resistance to paraquat-induced stresses has been studied. The normal conditions of pea colonization by methylobacteria were characterized by a decrease in the activity of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidases) and in the concentrations of endogenous H2O2, proline, and malonic dialdehyde, which is a product of lipid peroxidation and indicator of damage to plant cell membranes, and an increase in the activity of the photosynthetic apparatus (the content of chlorophylls а, b and carotenoids). In the presence of paraquat, the colonized plants had higher activities of antioxidant enzymes, stable photosynthetic indices, and a less intensive accumulation of the products of lipid peroxidation as compared to noncolonized plants. Thus, colonization by methylobacteria considerably increased the adaptive protection of pea plants to the paraquat-induced oxidative stress.