Is the Scale for Measuring Motivational Interviewing Skills a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the primary care professionals motivational skills?: EVEM study protocol
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Luis á Pérula (1) <br> Manuel Campi?ez (2) <br> Josep M Bosch (3) <br> Nieves Barragán Brun (2) <br> Juan C Arboniés (5) <br> Julia Bóveda Fontán (4) <br> Remedios Martín Alvarez (2) <br> Jose A Prados (6) <br> Enrique Martín-Rioboó (1) <br> Josep Massons (7) <br> Margarita Criado (1) <br> José á Fernández (1) <br> Juan M Parras (1) <br> Roger Ruiz-Moral (1) <br> Jesús Manuel Novo (8) <br>
- 关键词：Motivational interviewing ; Behavior change counseling ; Lifestyle change) ; Dyslipidemia ; Cardiovascular risk factors
- 刊名：BMC Family Practice
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：December 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：13
- 期：1
- 全文大小：205KB
- 参考文献：1. Burke BL: The efficacy of Motivational Interviewing and Its Adaptations: What We Know So Far. In / Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, Vol. 2. Edited by: Miller WR, Rollnick S. New York: Guilford; 2002:217-50. <br> 2. Miller WR: Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. / Behav Psychother 1983, 11:147-72. CrossRef <br> 3. Rogers CR: A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In / Psychology: The Study of a Science. 3rd edition. Edited by: Koch P. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1959:184-56. <br> 4. Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler CC: / Motivational Interviewing: Principles and Evidence in Motivational Interviewing in Health Care: Helping Patients Change Behavior. New York: Gilford Press; 2008. <br> 5. Rubak S, Sandb?k A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B: Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and metaanalysis. / B J of Gen Prac 2005, 55:305-12. <br> 6. William R, / et al.: Manual for the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC) . / V 2.1. Enero de 2008. Consultado en 2009. http://casaa.unm.edu/download/misc.pdf en mayo de. <br> 7. Moyers TB, Martin T, Manuel JK, Hendrickson SM, Miller WR: Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing. / J Subst Abuse Treat 2005, 28:119-26. CrossRef <br> 8. Lane C, Huws-Thomas M, Hood K, Rollnick S, Edwards K, Robling M: Measuring adaptations of motivational interviewing: the development and validation of the behavior change counseling index (BECCI). / Patient Educ Couns 2005, 56:166-73. CrossRef <br> 9. Bennett GA, Roberts HA, Vaughan TE, Gibbins JA, Rouse L: Evaluating a method of assessing competente in Motivational Interviewing: a study using simulated patient in the United Kindom. / Addict Behav 2007, 32:69-9. beh.2006.03.022">CrossRef <br> 10. Juárez P, Miller WR, Yahne CE, Bisonó A, Pirritano M: / Effectiveness of Spanish-Language Training for Clinicians in Motivational Interviewing. At: http://casaa.unm.edu/posters/Effectiveness%20of%20Spanish-Langua%20ge%20Training%20for%20Clinicians%20%20in%20Motivational%20Interviewing.pdf. Cited the 31/07/2011. At: . Cited the 31/07/2011. <br> 11. Seguí Díaz M, Linares Pou L, Blanco López W, Ramos Aleixades J, Torrent Quetglas M: Tiempos durante la visita médica en Atención primaria. / Aten Primaria 2004, 33:496-02. CrossRef <br> 12. Ruiz R, Prados JA, Alba M, Bellón J, Pérula LA: Validez y fiabilidad de un instrumento para la valoración de la entrevista clínica en médicos residentes de medicina de familia: el cuestionario GATHA-RES. / Aten Primaria 2001, 27:469-77. <br> 13. Gavilán E, de Torres LA P, Ruiz Moral R: Valoración de la relación clínica centrada en el paciente: Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala CICAA. / Aten Primaria 2010, 42:162-68. CrossRef <br> 14. Mead N, Bower P: Patient centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. / Soc Sci Med 2000, 51:1087-110. CrossRef <br> 15. Ruiz Moral R, Peralta Munguia L, de Torres LA P, Gavilán Moral E, Loayssa Lara JR: Participación del paciente en la toma de decisiones en atención primaria: una herramienta para su medición. / Aten Primaria 2010, 42:257-63. CrossRef <br> 16. Duffy FD, Gordon GH, Whelan G, Cole-Kelly K, Frankel R: Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II Report. / Acad Med 2004, 79:495-07. CrossRef <br> 17. Kraan HF, Crijnen AAM, Van der Vleuten CPM, Imbos T: Evaluation instruments for medical interviewing skills. In / The medical interview. Clinical care, education and research. Edited by: Lipkin M Jr, Putnam SP, Lazare A. New York: Springer; 1995. <br> 18. Street LR: Methodological considerations when assessing communication skills. / Medical Encounter 1997, 13:3-. <br> 19. Perula LA, Bosch JM, Julia B, Manuel C, Nieves B, Arbonies JC, / et al.: Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in improving lipid level in patients with dyslipidemia assisted by general practitioners: Dislip-EM study protocol. / BMC Fam Pract 2011, 12:125. U (Published: 5 November 2011). CrossRef <br> 20. Elford RW, / et al.: / with the Canadian task Force on Preventive Health Care. Counseling for Risky Health Habits: A Conceptual Framework for Primary Care Practitioners / . London, ON: Canadian Task Force; 2001. <br> 21. De Villiers MR, De Villiers PJT, Kent AP: The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. / Med Teach 2005, 27:639-43. CrossRef <br> 22. Streiner DL, Norman GR: / Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 3o ed edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. <br> 23. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC: / Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd edition. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; 2003. CrossRef <br> 24. Bland J, Altman D: Statistical methods for assessing agreement betweeen two methods of clinical measurements. / Lancet 1986, 1:307-10. CrossRef <br> 25. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. / Biometrics 1977, 33:159-74. CrossRef <br> 26. Jiménez J: Comparación de métodos cuantitativos de medida. / FMC 1994, 1:404-10. <br> 27. Carretero-Dios H, Pérez C: Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies. / Int J Clin Health Psychol 2005, 5:521-51. <br> 28. Floyd FJW, Keith F: Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. / Psychol Assess 1995, 7:286-99. CrossRef <br> 29. Norman GR, Streiner DL: Biostatistics. The Bare essentials . In / Hamilton. Ontario, Canada: B. C. Decker Inc; 1998. <br> 30. Mercer SW, McConnachie A, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GCM: Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice. / Fam Pract 2005, 22:328-34. CrossRef <br> 31. Wass V, van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R: Assessment of clinical competence. / Lancet 2001, 357:945-49. CrossRef <br> 32. Nunnally J, Bernstein I: / Teoría psicométrica. Madrid: McGraw-Hill; 1995. <br> 33. Grau G: Metodología para la validación de cuestionarios. / Medifam 1995, 5:351-59. <br> 34. Conroy R, Py?r?l? K, Fitzgerald T, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, / et al.: Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal CVD in Europe: the SCORE Project. / Eur Heart J 2003, 24:987-003. CrossRef <br> 35. Sans S, Fitzgerald AP, Royo D, Conroy R, Graham I: Calibración de la tabla SCORE de riesgo cardiovascular para Espa?a. / Rev Esp Cardiol 2007, 60:476-85. CrossRef <br> 36. Marrugat J, Vila J, Baena-Díez JM, Grau M, Sala J, Ramos R, Subirana I, Fitó M, Elosua R: Relative validity of the 10-year cardiovascular risk estimate in a population cohort of the REGICOR study. / Rev Esp Cardiol 2011, 64:385-94. CrossRef <br> 37. Coleman T: Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. / Fam Pract 2000, 17:422-27. CrossRef <br> 38. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/13/112/prepub" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/13/112/prepub <br>
- 作者单位：Luis á Pérula (1) <br> Manuel Campi?ez (2) <br> Josep M Bosch (3) <br> Nieves Barragán Brun (2) <br> Juan C Arboniés (5) <br> Julia Bóveda Fontán (4) <br> Remedios Martín Alvarez (2) <br> Jose A Prados (6) <br> Enrique Martín-Rioboó (1) <br> Josep Massons (7) <br> Margarita Criado (1) <br> José á Fernández (1) <br> Juan M Parras (1) <br> Roger Ruiz-Moral (1) <br> Jesús Manuel Novo (8) <br><br>1. Unidad Docente de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria de Córdoba, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC)/Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía/Universidad de Córdoba, Avda. Menéndez Pidal, s/n, Córdoba, Spain <br> 2. CAP Vallcarca, Barcelona, Spain <br> 3. área Básica de Salud Encants Maragall, Institut Catala de la Salut (ICS), Barcelona, Spain <br> 5. Centro de Salud de Beraun- Errenteria, Avda. Galzaraborda 67, Donostia, Spain <br> 4. EAP Colmeiro, C/ Pintor Colmeiro, 11, Vigo, Spain <br> 6. Centro de Salud Lucano (Córdoba), Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Kragujevac, Spain <br> 7. ABS Mataró 7. Institut Catala de la Salut (ICS), Barcelona, Spain <br> 8. Centro de Saúde “A Milagrosa- Lugo, Spain <br>
文摘
Background Lifestyle is one of the main determinants of people’s health. It is essential to find the most effective prevention strategies to be used to encourage behavioral changes in their patients. Many theories are available that explain change or adherence to specific health behaviors in subjects. In this sense the named Motivational Interviewing has increasingly gained relevance. Few well-validated instruments are available for measuring doctors-communication skills, and more specifically the Motivational Interviewing. Methods/Design The hypothesis of this study is that the Scale for Measuring Motivational Interviewing Skills (EVEM questionnaire) is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the primary care professionals skills to get behavior change in patients. To test the hypothesis we have designed a prospective, observational, multi-center study to validate a measuring instrument. –Scope: Thirty-two primary care centers in Spain. -Sampling and Size: a) face and consensual validity: A group composed of 15 experts in Motivational Interviewing. b) Assessment of the psychometric properties of the scale; 50 physician- patient encounters will be videoed; a total of 162 interviews will be conducted with six standardized patients, and another 200 interviews will be conducted with 50 real patients (n=362). Four physicians will be specially trained to assess 30 interviews randomly selected to test the scale reproducibility. -Measurements for to test the hypothesis: a) Face validity: development of a draft questionnaire based on a theoretical model, by using Delphi-type methodology with experts. b) Scale psychometric properties: intraobservers will evaluate video recorded interviews: content-scalability validity (Exploratory Factor Analysis), internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), intra-/inter-observer reliability (Kappa index, intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland & Altman methodology), generalizability, construct validity and sensitivity to change (Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient). Discussion The verification of the hypothesis that EVEM is a valid and reliable tool for assessing motivational interviewing would be a major breakthrough in the current theoretical and practical knowledge, as it could be used to assess if the providers put into practice a patient centered communication style and can be used both for training or researching purposes. Trials registration Dislip-EM study NCT01282190 (ClinicalTrials.gov)