Comparing Performances of Multiple Comparison Methods in Commonly Used 2 × C Contingency Tables
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Sengul Cangur ; Handan Ankarali ; Ozge Pasin
  • 关键词:Contingency table ; Multiple comparison ; Gavrilov–Benjamini–Sarkar ; Holm–Bonferroni ; Marascuilo ; Hommel
  • 刊名:Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:December 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:8
  • 期:4
  • 页码:337-345
  • 全文大小:378 KB
  • 刊物主题:Computer Appl. in Life Sciences; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics; Statistics for Life Sciences, Medicine, Health Sciences; Theoretical and Computational Chemistry; Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics; Computational Science and Engineering;
  • 出版者:International Association of Scientists in the Interdisciplinary Areas
  • ISSN:1867-1462
  • 卷排序:8
文摘
This study aims at mentioning briefly multiple comparison methods such as Bonferroni, Holm–Bonferroni, Hochberg, Hommel, Marascuilo, Tukey, Benjamini–Hochberg and Gavrilov–Benjamini–Sarkar for contingency tables, through the data obtained from a medical research and examining their performances by simulation study which was constructed as the total 36 scenarios to 2 × 4 contingency table. As results of simulation, it was observed that when the sample size is more than 100, the methods which can preserve the nominal alpha level are Gavrilov–Benjamini–Sarkar, Holm–Bonferroni and Bonferroni. Marascuilo method was found to be a more conservative than Bonferroni. It was found that Type I error rate for Hommel method is around 2 % in all scenarios. Moreover, when the proportions of the three populations are equal and the proportion value of the fourth population is far at a level of ±3 standard deviation from the other populations, the power value for Unadjusted All-Pairwise Comparison approach is at least a bit higher than the ones obtained by Gavrilov–Benjamini–Sarkar, Holm–Bonferroni and Bonferroni. Consequently, Gavrilov–Benjamini–Sarkar and Holm–Bonferroni methods have the best performance according to simulation. Hommel and Marascuilo methods are not recommended to be used because they have medium or lower performance. In addition, we have written a Minitab macro about multiple comparisons for use in scientific research.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700