Assessment of patients with disorder of consciousness: do different Coma Recovery Scale scoring correlate with different settings?
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Davide Sattin (1)
    Ambra M. Giovannetti (1)
    Francesca Ciaraffa (2)
    Venusia Covelli (1)
    Anna Bersano (2)
    Anna Nigri (3)
    Stefania Ferraro (3)
    Ludovico Minati (3)
    Davide Rossi (4)
    Dunja Duran (4)
    Eugenio Parati (2)
    Matilde Leonardi (1)
  • 关键词:Consciousness disorders ; Caregivers ; Outcome and process assessment ; Diagnostic techniques and procedures ; Diagnostic errors ; Persistent vegetative state
  • 刊名:Journal of Neurology
  • 出版年:2014
  • 出版时间:December 2014
  • 年:2014
  • 卷:261
  • 期:12
  • 页码:2378-2386
  • 全文大小:277 KB
  • 参考文献:1. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 330:1499-508 CrossRef
    2. Giacino JT (2005) The minimally conscious state: defining the borders of consciousness. Prog Brain Res 150:381-95 CrossRef
    3. Schnakers C (2012) Clinical assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. Arch Ital Biol 150(2-):36-3. doi:10.4449/aib.v150i2.1371
    4. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force (2010) Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91(12):1795-813. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.218 CrossRef
    5. Giacino JT, Schnakers C, Rodriguez-Moreno D, Kalmar K, Schiff N, Hirsch J (2009) Behavioural assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool’s gold? Prog Brain Res 177:33-8. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17704-X CrossRef
    6. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J (2004) The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2020-029 CrossRef
    7. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, Laureys S (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioural assessment. Bio Med Central Neurol 21:9-5. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-35
    8. Gill-Thwaites H (2006) Lotteries, loopholes and luck: misdiagnosis in the vegetative state patient. Brain Injury 20(13-4):1321-328 CrossRef
    9. Andrews K, Murphy L, Munday R, Littlewood C (1996) Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. Br Med J 6(313):13-6 CrossRef
    10. Toyoshima Y, Asano Y, Shinoda J, Takenaka S, Aki T, Iwama T (2011) A speech expression disorder in patients with severe diffuse brain injury who emerged from a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain Inj 25(12):1212-220. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.613087 CrossRef
    11. Majerus S, Bruno MA, Schnakers C, Giacino JT, Laureys S (2009) The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients. Prog Brain Res 177:49-1. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17705-1 CrossRef
    12. Avesani R, Roncari L, Khansefid M, Formisano R, Boldrini P, Zampolini M, Dambruoso F (2013) The Italian National Registry of severe acquired brain injury: epidemiological, clinical and functional data of 1469 patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 49(5):611-18
    13. Leonardi M, Sattin D, Raggi A (2013) An Italian population study on 600 persons in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Brain Inj 27(4):473-84. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.750758 CrossRef
    14. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR, Boly M, Pickard JD, Tshibanda L, Laureys S (2010) Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 362(7):579-89. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0905370 CrossRef
    15. Cruse D, Chennu S, Chatelle C, Bekinschtein TA, Fernández-Espejo D, Pickard JD, Owen AM (2011) Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study. Lancet 378(9809):2088-094. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61224-5
文摘
Differential diagnosis between Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State is a challenging task that requires specific assessment scales, involvement of expert neuropsychologists or physicians and use of tailored stimuli for eliciting behavioural responses. Although misdiagnosis rate as high as 40?% has been reported, no clear guidelines are available in literature on the optimal setting for assessment. The present study aims to analyse score differences in behavioural assessments of persons with disorders of consciousness (DOC) with or without family members and to determine whether the presence of caregivers could improve clinical accuracy in diagnostic evaluation. The research was conducted on 92 adults with DOC among 153 consecutive patients enrolled in the Coma Research Centre of the Neurological Institute C. Besta of Milan between January 2011 and May 2013. The results indicate that in almost half of the sample the scoring, thus the performance, observed with caregivers was better than without them. Furthermore, in 16?% of the sample, when assessment was performed with caregivers there was a change in diagnosis, from Vegetative to Minimally Conscious State or from that to Severe Disability. Finally, statistical differences were found in relation to diagnosis between mean scores in the “visual function-Coma Recovery Scale revised’s subscale obtained by raters plus caregiver and rates only assessment. This study demonstrates how the presence of caregivers can positively affect behavioural assessments of persons with DOC, thus contributing to the definition of the optimal setting for behavioural evaluation of patients, to decrease misdiagnosis rates.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700