A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Afshin Lotfi Sadigh (1)
  Rohollah F. Fouladi (2)
  Hassan Hashemi (3)
  Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad (4)
  
• 关键词：Photorefractive keratectomy ; Intraocular pressure ; Dynamic contour tonometry ; Goldmann applanation tonometry
• 刊名：Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：February 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：251
• 期：2
• 页码：603-608
• 全文大小：174KB
• 参考文献：1. Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Shafranov G (2004) Shields-textbook of glaucoma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
  2. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS (2002) Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1389-392
  3. Rashad KM, Bahnassy AA (2001) Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 17:420-27
  4. Park HJ, Uhm KB, Hong C (2001) Reduction in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:303-09 CrossRef
  5. Montés-Micó R, Charman WN (2001) Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 21:228-35 CrossRef
  6. Reinhard T, Sundmacher R (1999) Determining real IOP values. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:157-58 CrossRef
  7. Schneider E, Grehn F (2006) Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 15:2- CrossRef
  8. Agudelo LM, Molina CA, Alvarez DL (2002) Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. J Refract Surg 18:472-74
  9. Munger R, Hodge WG, Mintsioulis G, Agapitos PJ, Jackson WB, Damji KF (1998) Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy. Can J Ophthalmol 33:159-65
  10. Lee J, Lee CH, Choi J, Yoon SY, Sung KR, Park SB, Kook MS (2009) Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Korean J Ophthalmol 23:27-1 CrossRef
  11. Erickson DH, Goodwin D, Rollins M, Belaustegui A, Anderson C (2009) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. Optometry 80:169-74 CrossRef
  12. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3790-794 CrossRef
  13. Chang DH, Stulting RD (2005) Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology 112:1009-016 CrossRef
  14. Gimeno JA, Mu?oz LA, Valenzuela LA, Moltó FJ, Rahhal MS (2000) Influence of refraction on tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 19:512-16 CrossRef
  15. Kass MA (1996) Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology 103:183-85
  16. Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1-0 CrossRef
  17. Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M (2001) Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 10:261-65 CrossRef
  18. Stahl J, Vold S (2000) Effect of corneal thickness on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement in rabbits after excimer laser photoablation. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:736-43 CrossRef
  19. Patel S, Aslanides IM (1996) Main causes of reduced intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 12:673-74
  20. Fournier AV, Podtetenev M, Lemire J, Thompson P, Duchesne R, Perreault C, Chehade N, Blondeau P (1998) Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:905-10
  21. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ (2007) Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143:39-7 CrossRef
  22. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Friedenwald’s rigidity coefficient. Ophthalmologica 133:330-35 CrossRef
  23. Cennamo G, Rosa N, La Rana A, Bianco S, Sebastiani A (1997) Non-contact tonometry in patients that underwent photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica 211:341-43 CrossRef
  24. Lleó A, Marcos A, Calatayud M, Alonso L, Rahhal SM, Sanchis-Gimeno JA (2003) The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optom 86:104-08 CrossRef
  25. Realini T, Weinreb RN, Hobbs G (2009) Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 18:119-23 CrossRef
  26. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2007) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology 114:658-65 CrossRef
  27. Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C (2007) Clinical comparison of Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 16:694-99 CrossRef
  28. Doyle A, Lachkar Y (2005) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 14:288-92 CrossRef
  29. Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G (2009) Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Eye 23:262-69 CrossRef
  30. Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Katsanos A, Fanariotis M, Foudoulakis NC, Kozobolis VP (2011) Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249(5):767-73 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Afshin Lotfi Sadigh (1)
  Rohollah F. Fouladi (2)
  Hassan Hashemi (3)
  Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad (4)
  
  1. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Nikookari Eye Hospital, Tabriz, Iran
  2. Medical Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  3. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
  4. Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  
• ISSN：1435-702X

文摘

Background The intraocular pressure (IOP) could be measured by both Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Although these two methods have been discussed widely after laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASIK), there is little data in the cases undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). We aimed to compare the changes of IOP measurements obtained by GAT and DCT after PRK for myopia/myopic astigmatism. Methods This prospective study enrolled 77 candidates (154 eyes) for PRK to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism and 30 matched patients (30 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism who served as controls. Changes of the IOP measurements (ΔIOP) obtained by GAT and DCT before and at 6?months after PRK in the operated eyes, and at baseline and 6?months later in the controls, were documented. Changes of the central corneal thickness (ΔCCT) were determined in the same fashion. Results The mean IOP readings obtained by DCT were comparable before and at 6?months after procedure (18.34 ±?3.03?mmHg and 17.87 ±?2.61?mmHg respectively, p--.41); whereas the mean IOP reading obtained by GAT decreased significantly 6?months postoperatively (17.92 ±?3.63?mmHg and 16.25 ±?2.66?mmHg, p-lt;-.001). A significant correlation was present between the ΔIOP obtained by GAT and ΔCCT (r--.61, p-lt;-.001). Similar correlation was not significant between the DCT-obtained ΔIOP and the ΔCCT (r--.07, p--.44). The mean ΔIOP obtained by GAT was significantly higher in the operated eyes than in the controls (?.54?±-.45 vs 0.07?±-.44?mmHg, p--.02). The mean DCT-obtained ΔIOP was just marginally insignificant between the operated and nonoperated eyes (?.63?±-.59 vs 0.02?±-.38?mmHg respectively; p--.09). Conclusions The authors recommend DCT after PRK in the cases with myopia or myopic astigmatism