Perceptuo-motor effects of response-distractor compatibility in speech: beyond phonemic identity

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Kevin D. Roon (1) (2)
  Adamantios I. Gafos (2) (3)
  
  1. Speech Production Laboratory ; The Graduate Center of the City University of New York ; 365 Fifth Avenue ; New York ; NY ; 10016 ; USA
  2. Haskins Laboratories ; New Haven ; CT ; USA
  3. Department of Linguistics ; Universit盲t Potsdam ; Potsdam ; Germany
  
• 关键词：Speech perception ; Speech production ; Motor planning/programming ; Psycholinguistics
• 刊名：Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：February 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：22
• 期：1
• 页码：242-250
• 全文大小：1,121 KB
• 参考文献：1. Bohland, J. W., Bullock, D., & Guenther, F. H. (2009). Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences. / Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1504鈥?529. CrossRef
  2. Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constrainst in phonological speech errors. / Cognitive Science, 17, 149鈥?95. CrossRef
  3. Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. / Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149鈥?79. CrossRef
  4. Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. / Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3鈥?8.
  5. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Goldstein, L. (2009). Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(5), 1138鈥?149. CrossRef
  6. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 361鈥?77. CrossRef
  7. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). / Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. / Psychological Review, 105(2), 251鈥?79. CrossRef
  9. Gordon, P. C., & Meyer, D. E. (1984). Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(2), 153鈥?78.
  10. Kerzel, D., & Bekkering, H. (2000). Motor activation from visible speech: Evidence from stimulus response compatibility. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 634鈥?47.
  11. Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. / Psychological Research, 56(3), 130鈥?35. CrossRef
  12. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. / Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1鈥?8.
  13. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. / Cognition, 21, 1鈥?6. CrossRef
  14. Mitterer, H., & Ernestus, M. (2008). The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. / Cognition, 109(1), 168鈥?73. CrossRef
  15. Nielsen, K. Y. (2007). Implicit phonetic imitation is constrained by phonemic contrast. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), / Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1961鈥?964). Germany: Saarbr眉cken.
  16. Ohala, J. J. (1996). Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. / Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(3), 1718鈥?725. CrossRef
  17. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. / Cognition, 64, 249鈥?84. CrossRef
  18. Roon, K. D., & Gafos, A. I. (2013). A dynamical model of the speech perception-production link. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (eds.), / 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1241鈥?246). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  19. Schriefers, H. J., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. / Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86鈥?02. CrossRef
  20. Tilsen, S. (2009). Subphonemic and cross-phonemic priming in vowel shadowing: Evidence for the involvement of exemplars in production. / Journal of Phonetics, 37, 276鈥?96. CrossRef
  21. Viviani, P. (2002). Motor competence in the perception of dynamic events: A tutorial. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), / Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 406鈥?42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Yuen, I., Brysbaert, M., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2010). Activation of articulatory information in speech perception. / Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Social Sciences), 107, 592鈥?97. CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Cognitive Psychology;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1531-5320

文摘

Previous studies have found faster response times in a production task when a speaker perceives a distractor syllable that is identical to the syllable they are required to produce. No study has found such effects when a response and a distractor are not identical but share parameters below the level of the phoneme. Results from Experiment 1 show some evidence of a response-time effect of response-distractor voicing congruency. Experiment 2 showed a robust effect of articulator congruency: perceiving a distractor that has the same articulatory organ as that implicated in the planned motor response speeds up response times. These results necessitate a more direct and specific formulation of the perception-production link than warranted by previous experimental evidence. Implications for theories of speech production are also discussed.