Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Shaymaa E. Elsaka
- 关键词：Hybrid ceramic ; Orthodontic brackets ; Shear bond strength ; Surface treatments
- 刊名：Odontology
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：January 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：104
- 期：1
- 页码：68-76
- 全文大小：859 KB
- 参考文献：1.Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Özcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. AM J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:540–6.CrossRef
2.Yadav S, Upadhyay M, Borges GA, Roberts WE. Influence of ceramic (feldspathic) surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin. Angl Orthod. 2010;80:577–82.
3.Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:773–9.PubMed
4.Saraç YS, Külünk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Saraç D, Türk T. Effects of surface-conditioning methods on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to different all-ceramic materials. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:667–72.PubMed CrossRef
5.Türk T, Saraç D, Saraç YS, Elekdağ-Türk S. Effects of surface conditioning on bond strength of metal brackets to all-ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:450–6.PubMed CrossRef
6.Kukiattrakoon B, Samruajbenjakul B. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:87–93.PubMed CrossRef
7.Abu Alhaija ES, Abu AlReesh IA, AlWahadni AM. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:274–80.PubMed CrossRef
8.Karan S, Büyükyılmaz T, Toroğlu MS. Orthodontic bonding to several ceramic surfaces: are there acceptable alternatives to conventional methods? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(144):e7–14.
9.Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoğlu E, Arun T. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:402–6.PubMed CrossRef
10.Piascik JR, Wolter SD, Stoner BR. Development of a novel surface modification for improved bonding to zirconia. Dent Mater. 2011;27:e99–105.PubMed CrossRef
11.Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114:387–92.CrossRef
12.Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;109:420–30.CrossRef
13.Barbosa VLT, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O, Keith O. Direct bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107:159–64.CrossRef
14.Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:285–90.PubMed CrossRef
15.Kocadereli I, Canay S, Akça K. Tensile bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;119:617–20.CrossRef
16.Peterson IM, Pajares A, Lawn BR, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Mechanical characterization of dental ceramics by hertzian contacts. J Dent Res. 1998;77:589–602.PubMed CrossRef
17.Pannes DD, Bailey DK, Thompson JY, Pietz DM. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:66–9.PubMed CrossRef
18.Harari D, Shapira-Davis S, Gillis I, Roman I, Redlich M. Tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain facets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:551–4.CrossRef
19.Özcan M, Vallittu PK, Peltomäki T, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Bonding polycarbonate brackets to ceramic: effects of substrate treatment on bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:220–7.CrossRef
20.Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Silane based concepts on bonding resin composite to metals. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:1–8.PubMed
21.Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29:419–26.PubMed CrossRef
22.Vita enamic. Vita enamic concept brochure. https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/datei.php?src=portal/sap/dateien/c/cc0/Prospekte/10024/10024-Version-3/VITA_10024E_ENAMIC_PS_EN_V03.pdf .
23.Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. In-vitro strength degradation of dental ceramics and novel PICN material by sharp indentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;26:34–42.PubMed CrossRef
24.Al Jabbari YS, Al Taweel SM, Al Rifaiy M, Alqahtani MQ, Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S. Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations. Angl Orthod. 2014;84:649–55.CrossRef
25.Gal JY, Fovet Y, Adib-Yadzi M. About a synthetic saliva for in vitro studies. Talanta. 2001;53:1103–15.PubMed CrossRef
26.Falkensammer F, Freudenthaler J, Pseiner B, Bantleon HP. Influence of surface conditioning on ceramic microstructure and bracket adhesion. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:498–504.PubMed CrossRef
27.Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dent Mater. 2005;21:391–6.PubMed CrossRef
28.Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater. 2005;21:139–44.PubMed CrossRef
29.Ishida K, Endo T, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er, Cr:YSGG laser. Odontology. 2011;99:129–34.PubMed CrossRef
30.Cozza P, Martucci L, De Toffol L, Penco SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Angl Orthod. 2006;76:851–6.
31.Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333–40.PubMed CrossRef
32.Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1791–9.PubMed CrossRef
33.Oilo G. Bond strength testing—what does it mean? Int Dent J. 1993;43:492–8.PubMed
34.Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171–8.
35.Harris AM, Joseph VP, Rossouw E. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic resins to ceramic and metal brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:725–8.PubMed
36.Joseph VP, Rossouw E. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97:121–5.CrossRef
37.Odegaard J, Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:201–6.CrossRef
38.Blakey R, Mah J. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138:72–8.CrossRef
39.Eliades T, Lekka M, Eliades G, Brantley WA. Surface characterization of ceramic brackets: a multitechnique approach. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;105:10–8.CrossRef
40.Özcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:469–72.PubMed CrossRef
41.Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19:725–31.PubMed CrossRef
42.El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater. 2003;19:575–83.PubMed CrossRef
43.Schiettecatte D, Mullie G, Depoorter M. Treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103:375–8.PubMed
44.Cochran D, O’Keefe KL, Turner DT, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:297–300.CrossRef
45.Bayram M, Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Ulker M, Nur M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to aged resin composite surfaces: effect of surface conditioning. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:174–9.PubMed CrossRef
46.Smith GA, McInnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain–bond strength and refinishing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:245–52.CrossRef
47.Ozden AN, Akaltan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:85–8.PubMed CrossRef
48.Sinha PK, Nanda RS. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;112:132–7.CrossRef
49.Jost-Brinkmann PG, Bohme A. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:243–53.PubMed
50.Winchester L. Direct orthodontic bonding to porcelain: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:299–308.PubMed CrossRef
51.Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study of self-, light-, and dual-cured composites for orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1995;22:319–23.PubMed CrossRef
52.Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:13–23.PubMed CrossRef
53.Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:33–43.PubMed CrossRef
54.Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC. A randomized controlled trial to investigate brackets bonded with a hydrophilic primer. J Orthod. 2001;28:301–5.PubMed CrossRef - 作者单位：Shaymaa E. Elsaka (1) (2)
1. Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt
2. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi College of Dentistry and Nursing, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - 刊物类别：Medicine
- 刊物主题：Dentistry
- 出版者：Springer Japan
- ISSN：1618-1255
文摘
This study evaluated the effect of four different surface treatments methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and metal brackets to Vita Enamic (VE) CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic. A total of 240 plates (10 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm) were cut from VE ceramic blocks and divided into two groups. In each group, four subgroups were prepared by hydrofluoric acid (HF); phosphoric acid (H3PO4); diamond ceramic grinding bur; and silica coating using CoJet system (CJ). Maxillary central incisor metal (Victory Series) and ceramic (Clarity) brackets were bonded with light-cure composite and then stored in artificial saliva for 1 week and thermocycled. The SBS test was performed, and the failure types were classified with adhesive remnant index scores. Surface morphology of the ceramic was characterized after treatment using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test, and Weibull analysis. SBS was significantly affected by the type of bracket and by type of treatment (P < 0.001). Specimens treated with CJ presented with significantly higher SBS compared to other groups (P < 0.05). Improvements in SBS values (MPa) were found in the following order: CJ > HF > Bur > H3PO4. Ceramic bracket showed higher SBS compared to metal bracket. Adhesive failures between the ceramic and composite resin were the predominant mode of failure in all groups. Surface treatment of VE CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic with silica coating enhanced the adhesion with ceramic and metal brackets. Keywords Hybrid ceramic Orthodontic brackets Shear bond strength Surface treatments