Spatial modelling-based approach to phytogeographical regionalization using grassland vegetation data
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Tomá? Hlásny (1) (2)
Ingrid Turisová (3) - 关键词：Ellenberg indicator values ; Grassland vegetation ; Phytogeographical boundaries ; Spatial interpolation ; Analysis of variance
- 刊名：Central European Journal of Biology
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：April 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：7
- 期：2
- 页码：318-326
- 全文大小：762KB
- 参考文献：1. Hoffmann A.A., Blows M.W., Species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives, Trends Ecol. Evol., 1994, 9, 223-27 CrossRef
2. Brown J.H., Stevens G.C., Kaufman D.M., The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1996, 27, 597-23 CrossRef
3. Case T.J., Holt R.D., McPeek M.A., Keitt T.H., The community context of species’s borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives, Oikos, 2005, 108, 28-6 CrossRef
4. Fortin M.J., Keitt T.H., Maurer B.A., Taper M.L., Kaufman D.M., Blackburn T.M., Species-geographic ranges and distributional limits: pattern analysis and statistical issues, Oikos, 2005, 105, 7-7 CrossRef
5. Huntley B., How Plants Respond to Climate Change: Migration Rates, Individualism and the Cosequence for Plant Communities, Ann. Bot., 1991, 67,Suppl. 1, 15-2
6. Neilson R.P., Prentice I.C., Smith B., Kittel T.G.F., Viner D., Simulated changes in vegetation distribution under global warming, In: Watson R.T., Zinyowera M.C., Moss R.H., Dokken D.J., (Eds.), The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998
7. Bachelet D., Neilson P.N., Lenihan J.M., Drapek R.J., Climate Change Effects on Vegetation Distribution and Carbon Budget in the United States, Ecosystems, 2001, 4, 164-85 CrossRef
8. McCarty J.P., Ecological Consequence of Recent Climate Change, Conserv. Biol., 2001, 15, 320-31 CrossRef
9. Fagan W.F., Fortin M.J., Soykan C., Integrating Edge Detection and Dynamic Modeling in Quantitative Analyses fo Ecological Boundaries, Bioscience, 2003, 53, 730-38 CrossRef
10. Wiens J.A., Ecological flows across landscape boundaries: A conceptual overview, In: Hansen A.J., di Castri F., (Eds.), Landscape boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992
11. Fagan W.F., Cantrell R.S., Cosner C., How habitat edges change species interactions, Am. Nat., 1999, 153, 165-82 CrossRef
12. Laurance W.F., Didham R.K., Power M.E., Ecological boundaries: A search for synthesis, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2001, 16, 70-1 CrossRef
13. Cadenasso M.L., Picket S.T.A., Weathers K.C., Jones C.G., A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries, Bioscience, 2003, 53, 750-58 CrossRef
14. Risser P.G., The status of the science examining ecotones, Bioscience, 1995, 45, 318-25 CrossRef
15. O’Neill R.V., Johnson A.R., King A.W., A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale, Landscape Ecol., 1989, 3, 193-05 CrossRef
16. Strayer D.L., Power M.E., Fagan W.F., Pickett S.T.A., Belnap J., A classification of ecological boundaries, Bioscience, 2003, 53, 723-29 CrossRef
17. Bailey R.G., Delineation of ecosystem regions, Environ. Manage., 1983, 7, 365-73 CrossRef
18. Hargrove W., Hoffman F., Using multivariate clustering to characterize ecoregions borders, Comput. Sci. Eng., 1999, 1, 18-5 CrossRef
19. Zadeh L.A., Fuzzy Sets, Inform. Control, 1965, 8, 338-53 CrossRef
20. Wang F., Hall G.B., Fuzzy representation of geographic boundaries in GIS. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 1996, 10, 573-90.
21. Burrough P., Frank A.U., (Eds.), Geographic OBJECTS with Indeterminate Boundaries, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996
22. Lark R.M., Forming spatially coherent regions by classification of multi-variate data: An example from the analysis of maps of crop yield, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 1998, 12, 83-8. CrossRef
23. Usery E.L., A Conceptual framework and Fuzzy Set Implementation for Geographic Features, In: Burrough P.A., Frank A.U., (Eds.), Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996
24. Lark R.M., Forming spatially coherent regions by classification of multi-variate data: An example from the analysis of maps of crop yield, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 1998, 12, 83-8 CrossRef
25. O’Riordan T., Environmental science on the move, In: O’Riordan T., (Ed.), Environmental Science for Environmental Management, Prentice Hall, Harlow, 2001
26. Jacquez G.M., Maruca S., Fortin M.J., From fields to objects: a review of geographic boundary analysis, J. Geogr. Syst., 2000, 2, 221-41 CrossRef
27. Griffith D.A., A spatially adjusted ANOVA model, Geogr. Anal., 1978, 10, 296-01 CrossRef
28. Legendre P., Oden N.L., Sokal R.R., Vaudor A., Kim J., Approximate Analysis of Variance of Spatially Autocorrelated Regional Data, J. Classif., 2005, 7, 53-5 CrossRef
29. Cliff A.D., Ord J.K., Spatial Processes: Models and Applications, Pion, London, 1981
30. Hong N., White J.G., Gumpertz M.L., Weisz R., Spatial Analysis of Precision Agriculture Treatments in Randomized Complete Blocks: Guidelines for Covariance Model Selection, Agron. J., 2005, 97, 1082-096 CrossRef
31. Parrish J.A.D., Bazzaz F.A., Ontogenetic shifts in response to environmental gradients in oldfield annuals, Ecology, 1985, 66, 1296-302 CrossRef
32. ?kland R.H., Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Scandinavia, Sommerfeltia, 1990, Suppl. 1, 1-33
33. Diekmann M., Lawesson J.E., Shifts in ecological behaviour of herbaceous forest species along a transect from Northern central to North Europe, Folia Geobot., 1999, 34, 127-41 CrossRef
34. Schaffers A.P., Sykora K.V., Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements, J. Veg. Sci., 2000, 11, 225-44 CrossRef
35. Schmidtlein S., Imaging spectroscopy as a tool for mapping Ellenberg indicator values, J. Appl. Ecol., 2005, 42, 966-74 CrossRef
36. Pet?ík P., Bruelheide H., Species groups can be transferred across different scales, J. Biogeogr., 2006, 33, 1628-642 CrossRef
37. Diekmann M., Species indicator values as an inportant tool in applied ecology -a review, Basic Appl. Ecol., 2003, 4, 193-06 CrossRef
38. Jongman R.H.G., ter Braak C.J.F., van Tongeren O.F.R., Data analysis in community and landscape ecology, Pudoc, Wageningen, 1987
39. ter Braak C.J.F., Barendregt L.G., Weighted averaging of species indicator values; its efficiency in environmental calibration, Math. Biosci., 1986, 78, 57-2 CrossRef
40. Kowarik I., Seidling W., The use of Ellenberg’s indicator values -problems and restrictions of the method, [Zeigerwerdberechnungen nach Ellenberg -Zu Problemen und Einschr?nkungen einer sinnvollen Methode], Landschaft und Stadt, 1989, 21, 132-43 (in German)
41. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W., Pauli?en D., Indicator values of plant in Central Europe, [Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa], 2nd ed., Scr. Geobot., 1992, 18, 1-58 (in German)
42. K?fer J., Witte J.P.M., Cover-weighted averaging of indicator values in vegetation analyses, J. Veg. Sci., 2004, 15, 647-52 CrossRef
43. Turisová I., Hlásny T., Identification of phytogeographical borders using grassland vegetation data, Biologia, 2010, 65, 630-38 CrossRef
44. Tansley A.G., Chip T.F., Aims and Methods in the Study of Vegetation, Whitefriars, London, 1926
45. ?effer J., Stanová V., Lasák R., Galvánek D., Viceníková A., Mapping of grassland vegetation of Slovakia, [Mapovanie travinnej vegetácie Slovenska], 2nd ed., Daphne -Centrum pre aplikovanú ekológiu, Bratislava, 2000 (in Slovak)
46. Tichy L., Juice, software for vegetation classification, J. Veg. Sci., 2002, 13, 451-53 CrossRef
47. Barbujani G., Oden N.L., Sokal R., Detecting areas of abrupt change in maps of biological variables, Syst. Zool., 1989, 38, 376-89 CrossRef
48. Womble W.H., Differential systematics, Science, 1951, 114, 315-22. CrossRef
49. Rossi R.E., Mulla D.J., Journel A.G., Franz E.H., Geostatistical tools for modeling and intepreting ecological spatial dependence, Ecol. Monogr., 1992, 62, 277-14 CrossRef
50. Liebhold A.M., Rossi R.E., Kemp W.P., Geostatistics and geographic information systems in applied insect ecology, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 1993, 38, 303-27 CrossRef
51. Sokal R.R., Oden N.L., Thomson B.A., Local spatial autocorrelation in a biological model, Geogr. Anal., 1998, 30, 331-54 CrossRef
52. Fortin M.J., Olson R.J., Ferson S., Iverson L., Hunsaker C., Edwards G., et al., Issues related to the detection of boundaries, Landscape Ecol., 2000, 15, 453-66 CrossRef
53. Fortin M.J., Dale M., Spatial Analysis: A guide for ecologists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005
54. Bocquet-Appel J.P., Bacro J.N., Generalized Wombling, Syst. Biol., 1994, 43, 442-48
55. Lu H., Carlin B.P., Bayesian Areal Wombling for geographical boundary analysis, Geogr. Anal., 2005, 37, 265-85 CrossRef
56. Dengler J., Jansen F., Gl?ckler F., Peet R.K., de Cáceres M., Chytry M., et al., The Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science, J. Veg. Sci., 2011, 22, 582-97 CrossRef
57. Wamelink G.W.W., Joosten V., van Dobben H.F., Berendse F., Validity of Ellenberg indicator values judged from physico-chemical field measurements, J. Veg. Sci., 2002, 13, 269-78 CrossRef
58. Ewald J., The sensitivity of Ellenberg indicator values to the completeness of vegetation relevés, Basic Appl. Ecol., 2003, 4, 507-13 CrossRef
59. Csillag F., Boots B., Fortin M.J., Lowell K., Potvin F., Multiscale Characterization of Boundaries and Landscape Ecological Patterns, Geomatica, 2001, 55, 509-22
60. Kadmon R., Danin A., Floristic variation in Israel: a GIS analysis, Flora, 1997, 192, 341-45
61. Chytry M., Grulich V., Tichy L., Kou?il M., Phytogeographical boundary between Pannonicum and Hercynicum: a multivariate analysis of landscape in the Podyjí/Thayatal National Park, Czech Republic/Austria, Preslia, 1999, 71, 1-9
62. Lososová Z., Simonová D., Changes in a synantropic vegetation, Preslia, 2008, 80, 291-05
63. Goovaerts P., Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997
64. Chiles J.P., Delfiner P., Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1999
65. Lantuéjoul Ch., Geostatistical Simulations. Models and Algorithms, Verlag Print, Berlin, 2002 - 作者单位：Tomá? Hlásny (1) (2)
Ingrid Turisová (3)
1. National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute, 960 62, Zvolen, Slovak Republic
2. Faculty of Forestry and Wood Science, Czech University of Life Sciences, 165 21, Prague, Czech Republic
3. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, 974 01, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic - ISSN：1644-3632
文摘
We presented a methodology for drawing continuous boundaries in the landscape differentiating between regions with different floristic composition. A region in Central Slovakia covering 2,445 km2 was investigated. Ecological indicator values for temperature (EIT) in 1,978 grassland polygons were analysed. Ordinary kriging was used to interpolate EIT across the study region. Lattice wombling was used to identify the most intensive gradients in EIT and to draw boundaries, while ANOVA was used for post-classification analysis. A strong pattern of spatial continuity was present in EIT assigned to species in grassland polygons allowing for drawing continuous boundaries in the landscape. The study region was divided into 15 districts using the proposed method. Post-classification analysis indicated that 17 out of 23 adjacent districts were found to differ significantly in term of mean value of source samples. The results implied the need for incorporating spatial autocorrelation in sample data into post-classification analysis; such factor is often neglected in ecological research. The presented findings suggested broader applicability of the proposed method for spatial modelling, as vegetation data is widely accessible in databases for many regions of Europe.