Factors that influence the recognition, reporting and resolution of incidents related to medical devices and other healthcare technologies: a systematic review

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Julie Polisena (1) (2)
  Anna Gagliardi (3)
  David Urbach (3) (4)
  Tammy Clifford (1) (2)
  Michelle Fiander (5)
  
  1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health ; 600-865 Carling Avenue ; Ottawa ; ON ; K1S 5S8 ; Canada
  2. Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine ; Faculty of Medicine ; University of Ottawa ; 451 Smyth Road ; Ottawa ; ON ; K1H 8聽M5 ; Canada
  3. Toronto General Research Institute ; University Health Network ; 200 Elizabeth Street ; Toronto ; ON ; M5G 2C4 ; Canada
  4. Department of Surgery and Institute of Health Policy ; Management and Evaluation ; University of Toronto ; 200 Elizabeth Street ; Toronto ; ON ; M5G 2C4 ; Canada
  5. Cochrane Effective Practise & Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group ; Centre for Practice Changing Research ; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute ; 501 Smyth Road ; Box 711 ; Ottawa ; ON ; K1H 8聽L6 ; Canada
  
• 关键词：Medical device ; Healthcare technology ; Post ; market surveillance ; Incidents ; Patient safety ; Hospital
• 刊名：Systematic Reviews
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：4
• 期：1
• 全文大小：702 KB
• 参考文献：1. Maisel, WH (2004) Medical device regulation: an introduction for the practicing physician. Ann Intern Med 140: pp. 296-302 CrossRef
  2. Thomas, AN, Galvin, I (2008) Patient safety incidents associated with equipment in critical care: a review of reports to the UK National Patient Safety Agency. Anaesthesia 63: pp. 1193-7 CrossRef
  3. Lawton, R, McEachan, RR, Giles, SJ, Sirriyeh, R, Watt, IS, Wright, J (2012) Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 21: pp. 369-80 CrossRef
  4. Pfeiffer, Y, Manser, T, Wehner, T (2010) Conceptualising barriers to incident reporting: a psychological framework. Qual Saf Health Care 19: pp. e60 CrossRef
  5. Sievanen, H (2003) User reporting of medical device related incidents. Med Device Technol 14: pp. 26-9
  6. Vidi, VD, Matheny, ME, Resnic, FS (2011) Post-marketing device safety surveillance. Contemp Clin Trials 32: pp. 307-8 CrossRef
  7. Vidi, VD, Matheny, ME, Donnelly, S, Resnic, FS (2011) An evaluation of a distributed medical device safety surveillance system: the DELTA network study. Contemp Clin Trials 32: pp. 309-17 CrossRef
  8. Malenka, DJ, Kaplan, AV, Sharp, SM, Wennberg, JE (2005) Postmarketing surveillance of medical devices using Medicare claims. Health Aff (Millwood) 24: pp. 928-37 CrossRef
  9. Sievanen, H, Pommelin, P (2003) Quality analysis of medical device vigilance reports. Technol Health Care 11: pp. 275-81 CrossRef
  10. Gagliardi, AR, Umoquit, M, Lehoux, P, Ross, S, Ducey, A, Urbach, DR (2013) Identifying optimal postmarket surveillance strategies for medical and surgical devices: implications for policy, practice and research. BMJ Qual Saf 22: pp. 210-8 CrossRef
  11. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6: pp. e1000097 71/journal.pmed.1000097" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  Grey matters: a practical search tool for evidence-based medicine. CADTH, Ottawa
  10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Qualitative research checklist. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), Oxford
  12. Sleith, C (2012) Methodology checklist 3: cohort studies. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Edinburgh (UK)
  13. Sleith, C (2012) Methodology checklist 4: case control studies. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Edinburgh (UK)
  14. Loren, DJ, Garbutt, J, Dunagan, WC, Bommarito, KM, Ebers, AG, Levinson, W (2010) Risk managers, physicians, and disclosure of harmful medical errors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 36: pp. 101-8
  15. Henneman, EA, Gawlinski, A, Blank, FS, Henneman, PL, Jordan, D, McKenzie, JB (2010) Strategies used by critical care nurses to identify, interrupt, and correct medical errors. Am J Crit Care 19: pp. 500-9 CrossRef
  16. Bogn谩r, A, Barach, P, Johnson, JK, Duncan, RC, Birnbach, D, Woods, D (2008) Errors and the burden of errors: attitudes, perceptions, and the culture of safety in pediatric cardiac surgical teams. Ann Thorac Surg 85: pp. 1374-81 CrossRef
  17. Schectman, JM, Plews-Ogan, ML (2006) Physician perception of hospital safety and barriers to incident reporting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 32: pp. 337-43
  18. Ursprung, R, Gray, JE, Edwards, WH, Horbar, JD, Nickerson, J, Plsek, P (2005) Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day. Qual Saf Health Care 14: pp. 284-9 CrossRef
  19. Demiris, G, Patrick, TB, Austin, BS (2004) Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US state. Inform Prim Care 12: pp. 157-62 CrossRef
  20. Cohen, MM, Kimmel, NL, Benage, MK, Hoang, C, Burroughs, TE, Roth, CA (2004) Implementing a hospitalwide patient safety program for cultural change. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 30: pp. 424-31
  21. Jeffe, DB, Dunagan, WC, Garbutt, J, Burroughs, TE, Gallagher, TH, Hill, PR (2004) Using focus groups to understand physicians鈥?and nurses鈥?perspectives on error reporting in hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 30: pp. 471-9
  22. Hohenhaus, SM (2008) Emergency nursing and medical error鈥揳 survey of two states. J Emerg Nurs 34: pp. 20-5 CrossRef
  23. Wong, SC, Kelly, SP, Sullivan, PM (2013) Patient safety in vitreoretinal surgery: quality improvements following a patient safety reporting system. Br J Ophthalmol 97: pp. 302-7 CrossRef
  24. Anderson, JE, Kodate, N, Walters, R, Dodds, A (2013) Can incident reporting improve safety? Healthcare practitioners鈥?views of the effectiveness of incident reporting. Int J Qual Health Care 25: pp. 141-50 CrossRef
  25. Kreckler, S, Catchpole, K, McCulloch, P, Handa, A (2009) Factors influencing incident reporting in surgical care. Qual Saf Health Care 18: pp. 116-20 CrossRef
  26. Kroll, L, Singleton, A, Collier, J, Rees, JI (2008) Learning not to take it seriously: junior doctors鈥?accounts of error. Med Educ 42: pp. 982-90 CrossRef
  27. Waring, JJ (2005) Beyond blame: cultural barriers to medical incident reporting. Soc Sci Med 60: pp. 1927-35 CrossRef
  28. Heard, GC, Sanderson, PM, Thomas, RD (2012) Barriers to adverse event and error reporting in anesthesia. Anesth Analg 114: pp. 604-14 CrossRef
  29. Evans, SM, Smith, BJ, Esterman, A, Runciman, WB, Maddern, G, Stead, K (2007) Evaluation of an intervention aimed at improving voluntary incident reporting in hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care 16: pp. 169-75 CrossRef
  30. Kingston, MJ, Evans, SM, Smith, BJ, Berry, JG (2004) Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards incident reporting: a qualitative analysis. Med J Aust 181: pp. 36-9
  31. Evans, SM, Berry, JG, Smith, BJ, Esterman, A, Selim, P, O鈥橲haughnessy, J (2006) Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study. Qual Saf Health Care 15: pp. 39-43 CrossRef
  32. Hartnell, N, MacKinnon, N, Sketris, I, Fleming, M (2012) Identifying, understanding and overcoming barriers to medication error reporting in hospitals: a focus group study. BMJ Qual Saf 21: pp. 361-8 CrossRef
  33. Cooke, DL, Dunscombe, PB, Lee, RC (2007) Using a survey of incident reporting and learning practices to improve organisational learning at a cancer care centre. Qual Saf Health Care 16: pp. 342-8 CrossRef
  34. Espin, S, Wickson-Griffiths, A, Wilson, M, Lingard, L (2010) To report or not to report: a descriptive study exploring ICU nurses鈥?perceptions of error and error reporting. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 26: pp. 1-9 CrossRef
  35. Flotta, D, Rizza, P, Bianco, A, Pileggi, C, Pavia, M (2012) Patient safety and medical errors: knowledge, attitudes and behavior among Italian hospital physicians. Int J Qual Health Care 24: pp. 258-65 CrossRef
  36. Albolino, S, Tartaglia, R, Bellandi, T, Amicosante, AM, Bianchini, E, Biggeri, A (2010) Patient safety and incident reporting: survey of Italian healthcare workers. Qual Saf Health Care 19: pp. i8-12 CrossRef
  37. Hwang, JI, Lee, SI, Park, HA (2012) Barriers to the operation of patient safety incident reporting systems in korean general hospitals. Healthc Inform Res 18: pp. 279-86 CrossRef
  38. Kim, J, An, K, Kim, MK, Yoon, SH (2007) Nurses鈥?perception of error reporting and patient safety culture in Korea. West J Nurs Res 29: pp. 827-44 CrossRef
  39. Bodur, S, Filiz, E (2010) Validity and reliability of Turkish version of 鈥淗ospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture鈥?and perception of patient safety in public hospitals in Turkey. BMC Health Serv Res 10: pp. 28 CrossRef
  40. Chien, CH, Huang, YY, Chong, FC (2010) A framework of medical equipment management system for in-house clinical engineering department. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010: pp. 6054-7
  41. Malik, MR, Alam, AY, Mir, AS, Malik, GM, Abbas, SM (2010) Attitudes and perceived barriers of tertiary level health professionals towards incident reporting in Pakistan. N Am J Med Sci 2: pp. 100-5
  42. Mazeau, V, Grenier-Sennelier, C, Paturel, DX, Mokhtari, M, Vidal-Trecan, G (2004) Telephone survey of hospital staff knowledge of medical device surveillance in a Paris hospital. Eval Health Prof 27: pp. 398-409 CrossRef
  43. Smits, M, Zegers, M, Groenewegen, PP, Timmermans, DR, Zwaan, L, Wal, G (2010) Exploring the causes of adverse events in hospitals and potential prevention strategies. Qual Saf Health Care 19: pp. e5
  44. Samore, MH, Evans, RS, Lassen, A, Gould, P, Lloyd, J, Gardner, RM (2004) Surveillance of medical device-related hazards and adverse events in hospitalized patients. JAMA 291: pp. 325-34 CrossRef
  45. Gawande, AA, Zinner, MJ, Studdert, DM, Brennan, TA (2003) Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133: pp. 614-21 CrossRef
  46. Simon, A, Lee, RC, Cooke, DL, Lorenzetti, D (2005) Institute for Health Economics: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Institutional medical incident medical reporting systems: a review, Edmonton
  47. Hinrichs, S, Dickerson, T, Clarkson, J (2013) Stakeholder challenges in purchasing medical devices for patient safety. J Patient Saf 9: pp. 36-43
  48. Morrison, A, Polisena, J, Husereau, D, Moulton, K, Clark, M, Fiander, M (2012) The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28: pp. 138-44 CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Medicine/Public Health, general; Biomedicine general; Statistics for Life Sciences, Medicine, Health Sciences;
• 出版者：BioMed Central
• ISSN：2046-4053

文摘

Background Medical devices have improved the treatment of many medical conditions. Despite their benefit, the use of devices can lead to unintended incidents, potentially resulting in unnecessary harm, injury or complications to the patient, a complaint, loss or damage. Devices are used in hospitals on a routine basis. Research to date, however, has been primarily limited to describing incidents rates, so the optimal design of a hospital-based surveillance system remains unclear. Our research objectives were twofold: i) to explore factors that influence device-related incident recognition, reporting and resolution and ii) to investigate interventions or strategies to improve the recognition, reporting and resolution of medical device-related incidents. Methods We searched the bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PsycINFO database. Grey literature (literature that is not commercially available) was searched for studies on factors that influence incident recognition, reporting and resolution published and interventions or strategies for their improvement from 2003 to 2014. Although we focused on medical devices, other health technologies were eligible for inclusion. Results Thirty studies were included in our systematic review, but most studies were concentrated on other health technologies. The study findings indicate that fear of punishment, uncertainty of what should be reported and how incident reports will be used and time constraints to incident reporting are common barriers to incident recognition and reporting. Relevant studies on the resolution of medical errors were not found. Strategies to improve error reporting include the use of an electronic error reporting system, increased training and feedback to frontline clinicians about the reported error. Conclusions The available evidence on factors influencing medical device-related incident recognition, reporting and resolution by healthcare professionals can inform data collection and analysis in future studies. Since evidence gaps on medical device-related incidents exist, telephone interviews with frontline clinicians will be conducted to solicit information about their experiences with medical devices and suggested strategies for device surveillance improvement in a hospital context. Further research also should investigate the impact of human, system, organizational and education factors on the development and implementation of local medical device surveillance systems.