The effect of pre-existing memory representations on repetition-related N250r and N400

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Aiqing Nie ; Jingheng Ye ; Minye Li
• 关键词：Repetition priming ; Pre ; existing memory representation ; Face ; Letter string ; N250r ; N400 ; 关键词
重复启动 ; 预存记忆表征 ; 面孔 ; 字符串 N250r ; N400
• 刊名：Chinese Science Bulletin
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：61
• 期：4
• 页码：265-275
• 全文大小：3,297 KB
• 参考文献：1.Henson RN, Shallice T, Dolan R (2000) Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 287:1269–1272CrossRef
  2.Henson RN, Ross E, Rylands A et al (2004) ERP and fMRI effects of lag on priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces. In: Human brain mapping conference, Budapest, Hungary
  3.Rugg MD (1990) Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Mem Cogn 18:367–379CrossRef
  4.Stark CEL, McClelland JL (2000) Repetition priming of words, pseudowords, and nonwords. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26:954–972CrossRef
  5.Swick D, Knight RT (1997) Event-related potentials differentiate the effects of aging on word and nonword repetition in explicit and implicit memory tasks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 23:123–142CrossRef
  6.Bentin S, Moscovitch M (1988) The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces. J Exp Psychol Gen 117:148–160CrossRef
  7.Dörr P, Herzmann G, Sommer W (2011) Multiple contributions to priming effects for familiar faces: analyses with backward masking and event-related potentials. Br J Psychol 102:765–782CrossRef
  8.Ganel T, Gonzalez CLR, Valyear KF et al (2006) The relationship between fMRI adaptation and repetition priming. NeuroImage 32:1432–1440CrossRef
  9.Logan GD (1988) Towards an instance theory of automaticity. Psychol Rev 22:492–527CrossRef
  10.Neumann MF, Schweinberger SR (2008) N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load. Brain Res 1239:181–190CrossRef
  11.Neumann MF, Schweinberger SR (2009) N250r ERP repetition effects from distractor faces when attending to another face under load: evidence for a face attention resource. Brain Res 1270:64–77CrossRef
  12.Nie AQ, Griffin M, Keinath A et al (2014) ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category. Brain Res 1557:66–73CrossRef
  13.Boehm SG, Klostermann EC, Paller KA (2006) Neural correlates of perceptual contributions to nondeclarative memory for faces. NeuroImage 30:1021–1029CrossRef
  14.Engst FM, Martín-Loeches M, Sommer W (2006) Memory systems for structural and semantic knowledge of faces and buildings. Brain Res 1124:70–80CrossRef
  15.Heisz JJ, Shedden JM, McIntosh AR (2012) Relating brain signal variability to knowledge representation. NeuroImage 63:1384–1392CrossRef
  16.Herzmann G, Sommer W (2007) Memory-related ERP components for experimentally learned faces and names: characteristics and parallel-test reliabilities. Psychophysiology 44:262–276CrossRef
  17.Schweinberger SR, Pickering EC, Burton AM et al (2002) Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition. Neuropsychologia 40:2057–2073CrossRef
  18.Tacikowski P, Jednoróg K, Marchewka A et al (2011) How multiple repetitions influence the processing of self-, famous and unknown names and faces: an ERP study. Int J Psychophysiol 79:219–230CrossRef
  19.Webb SJ, Jones EJ, Merkle K et al (2010) Response to familiar faces, newly familiar faces, and novel faces as assessed by ERPs is intact in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Int J Psychophysiol 77:106–117CrossRef
  20.Wiese H, Wolff N, Steffens MC et al (2013) How experience shapes memory for faces: an event-related potential study on the own-age bias. Biol Psychol 94:369–379CrossRef
  21.Burton AM, Bruce V, Johnston RA (1990) Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. Br J Psychol 81:361–380CrossRef
  22.Bindemann M, Burton AM, Leuthold H et al (2008) Brain potential correlates of face recognition: geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions. Psychophysiology 45:535–544CrossRef
  23.Henson RN, Goshen-Gottstein Y, Ganel T et al (2003) Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cereb Cortex 13:793–805CrossRef
  24.Pfütze E-M, Sommer W, Schweinberger SR (2002) Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychol Aging 17:140–160CrossRef
  25.Schweinberger SR, Huddy V, Burton AM (2004) N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. NeuroReport 15:1501–1505CrossRef
  26.Schweinberger SR, Pfütze E-M, Sommer W (1995) Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: evidence from event-related potentials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:722–736CrossRef
  27.Schweinberger SR, Pickering EC, Jentzsch I et al (2002) Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cogn Brain Res 14(3):398–409CrossRef
  28.Tanaka JW, Curran T, Porterfield AL et al (2006) Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. J Cogn Neurosci 18:1488–1497CrossRef
  29.Zimmermann FG, Eimer M (2013) Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia 51:1320–1329CrossRef
  30.Caharel S, d’Arripe O, Ramon M et al (2009) Early adaptation to repeated unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes in the right hemisphere: evidence from the N170 ERP component. Neuropsychologia 47:639–643CrossRef
  31.Cooper TJ, Harvey M, Lavidor M et al (2007) Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia 45:2910–2921CrossRef
  32.Herzmann G, Kunina O, Sommer W et al (2009) Individual differences in face cognition: brain-behavior relationships. J Cogn Neurosci 22:571–589CrossRef
  33.Herzmann G, Schweinberger SR, Sommer W et al (2004) What’s special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. Psychophysiology 41:688–701CrossRef
  34.Itier RJ, Taylor MJ (2002) Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs. NeuroImage 15:353–372CrossRef
  35.Itier RJ, Taylor MJ (2004) Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. NeuroImage 21:1518–1532CrossRef
  36.Kaufmann JM, Schweinberger SR, Burton AM (2009) N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images. J Cogn Neurosci 21:625–641CrossRef
  37.Kuefner D, de Heering A, Jacques C et al (2010) Early visually evoked electrophysiological responses over the human brain (P1, N170) show stable patterns of face-sensitivity from 4 years to adulthood. Front Hum Neurosci 3:1–20CrossRef
  38.Langeslag SJE, Morgan HM, Jackson MC et al (2009) Electrophysiological correlates of improved short-term memory for emotional faces. Neuropsychologia 47:887–896CrossRef
  39.Martín-Loeches M, Sommer W, Hinojosa JA (2005) ERP components reflecting stimulus identification: contrasting the recognition potential and the early repetition effect (N250r). Int J Psychophysiol 55:113–125CrossRef
  40.Guillaume C, Guillery-Girard B, Chaby L et al (2009) The time course of repetition effects for familiar faces and objects: an ERP study. Brain Res 1248:149–161CrossRef
  41.Pickering EC, Schweinberger SR (2003) N200, N250r, and N400 event-related brain potentials reveal three loci of repetition priming for familiar names. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 9:1298–1311CrossRef
  42.Caharel S, Jacques C, d’Arripe O et al (2011) Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes. Brain Res 1387:85–98CrossRef
  43.Neumann MF, Mohamed TN, Schweinberger SR (2011) Face and object encoding under perceptual load: ERP evidence. NeuroImage 54:3021–3027CrossRef
  44.Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM (1968) A proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence KW, Spence JT (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 89–195
  45.Reder LM, Victoria LW, Manelis A et al (2012) Why it’s easier to remember seeing a face we already know than one we don’t: pre-existing memory representations facilitate memory formation. Psychol Sci 24:363–372CrossRef
  46.Berry CJ, Shanks DR, Speekenbrink M et al (2012) Models of recognition, repetition priming, and fluency: exploring a new framework. Psychol Rev 119:40–79CrossRef
  47.Jasper HH (1958) The 10–20 electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10:370–375CrossRef
  48.Nowagk R, Pfeifer E (1996) Unix implementation of the ERP evaluation package. In: Annual report 1996, Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 124–126
  49.Jacoby LL, Dallas M (1981) On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. J Exp Psychol Gen 110:306–340CrossRef
  50.Versace R, Nevers B (2003) Word frequency effect on repetition priming as a function of prime duration and delay between the prime and the target. Br J Psychol 94:389–408CrossRef
  51.Holcomb PJ, Grainger J (2007) Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials. Brain Res 1180:39–58CrossRef
  52.Dufau S, Grainger J, Holcomb PJ (2008) An ERP investigation of location invariance in masked repetition priming. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 8:222–228CrossRef
  53.Schweinberger SR, Ramsay AL, Kaufmann JM (2006) Hemispheric asymmetries in font-specific and abstractive priming of written personal names: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res 1117:195–205CrossRef
  54.Young MP, Rugg MD (1992) Word frequency and multiple repetition as determinants of the modulation of event-related potentials in a semantic classification task. Psychophysiology 29:664–676CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Aiqing Nie (1)
  Jingheng Ye (1)
  Minye Li (1)
  
  1. Department of Psychology and Behavior Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310028, China
  
• 刊物主题：Science, general; Life Sciences, general; Physics, general; Chemistry/Food Science, general; Earth Sciences, general; Engineering, general;
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：1861-9541

文摘

Studies of repetition priming have found two face-sensitive event-related potential (ERP) components: the N250r showing positive deflection at frontal region and negative deflection at temporal region, and the N400 showing positive deflection at frontal and centro-parietal regions, both of which depend in part upon the presence or absence of a pre-existing face representation. However, the N250r is rarely reported for a repetition interval between immediate repetition and 3 min; in addition, whether different types of representations function in the same way is also of interest. The goal of the present experiment is to compare the ERP patterns for faces versus letter strings as a function of the pre-existing memory representation with a repetition interval of 1.5 min on average. We found reliable frontally positive N250r and N400 for famous faces and words; marginally significant effects for pseudo-words; and only the centro-parietal N400 for unfamiliar faces. Collectively, the N250r persists in the present intermediate intervals, and both the frontal N250r and the frontal N400 are domain-general, sensitive to the pre-existing memory representation. Keywords Repetition priming Pre-existing memory representation Face Letter string N250r N400