Constructing strategies in strategic planning: a decision support evaluation model

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ivan Blecic (1)
  Arnaldo Cecchini (1)
  Clara Pusceddu (1)
  
• 关键词：Strategic urban and territorial planning ; Multi ; objective decision ; making ; Project selection ; Project interdependencies ; Decision support system
• 刊名：Operational Research
• 出版年：2008
• 出版时间：August 2008
• 年：2008
• 卷：8
• 期：2
• 页码：153-166
• 全文大小：374KB
• 参考文献：1. Albrechts L, Alden L, de Rosa Pires A (eds) (2001) The changing institutional landscape of planning. Ashgate, Aldershot
  2. Alexander ER (eds) (2006) Evaluation in planning: evolution and prospects. Ashgate, Aldershot
  3. Bouyssou D, Marchant T, Pirlot M, Tsoukiàs A, Vincke P (2006) Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria: stepping stones for the analyst. Springer, New York
  4. Brans J-P, Vincke Ph (1985) A preference ranking organisation method. (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manage Sci 31(6):647-56
  5. Carraway RL, Schmidt RL (1991) An improved discrete dynamic programming algorithm for allocating resources among interdependent projects. Manage Sci 37(9):1195-200 CrossRef
  6. Coello CA, Van Veldhuizen DA, Lamont GB (2002) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Kluwer, Boston
  7. Cooke P, Boekholt P, Todtling F (2000) The governance of innovation in Europe. Pinter, London
  8. Debord B (1992) An axiomatic characterization of Borda’s k-choice function. Soc Choice Welf 9:337-43 CrossRef
  9. Dickinson MW, Thornton AC, Graves S (2001) Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 48(4):518-27 CrossRef
  10. Faludi A (eds) (2002) European spatial planning, Lincoln institute of land policy. Cambridge
  11. Faludi A, Waterhout B (2002) The making of the European spatial development perspective. Routledge, London
  12. Fonseca CM, Fleming PJ (1995) An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimisation. Evol Comput 3(1):1-6 CrossRef
  13. Fox GE, Baker NR, Bryant JL (1984) Economic models for R and D project selection in the presence of project interactions. Manage Sci 30(7):890-02
  14. Goldberg D (1998) Genetic algorithms and evolution strategy in engineering and computer science: recent advances and industrial applications. Wiley, Boston
  15. Harker PT, Vargas LG (1987) The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Manage Sci 33(11):1383-403
  16. Healey P (2004) The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. Int J Urban Reg Res 28(1):45-7 CrossRef
  17. Kuei C-H, Lin C, Aheto J, Madu CN (1994) A strategic decision model for the selection of advanced technology. Int J Prod Res 32(9):2117-130 CrossRef
  18. Lefèbvre C (1998) Metropolitan government and governance in western countries, a critical review. Int Urban Reg Res 22(1)
  19. Lichfield N, Barbanente A, Borri D, Khakee A, Prat A (eds) (1998) Evaluation in planning: facing the challenge of complexity. Kluwer, Dordrecht
  20. Liesi? J, Mild P, Salo A (2007) Robust portfolio modelling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur J Oper Res (in press) doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.049
  21. Maystre LY, Pictet J, Simos J (1994) Méthodes multicritères ELECTRE. Presses polytechniques et universitaires Romandes, Lausanne
  22. Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D, Caloghirou Y (2006) Project prioritization under policy restrictions. A combination of MCDA with 0- programming. Eur J Oper Res 171(1):296-08 CrossRef
  23. Medaglia AL, Graves SB, Ringuest LJ (2007) A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 179(3):869-94 CrossRef
  24. Medaglia AL, Hueth D, Mendieta JC, Sefair JA (2007) Multiobjective model for the selection and timing of public enterprise projects. Socioecon Plann Sci (in press). doi:10.1016/j.seps.2006.06.009
  25. Patassini D, Miller D (eds) (2005) Beyond benefit cost analysis: accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation. Ashgate, Aldershot
  26. Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). RIRO 2:57-5
  27. Roy B (1971) Problems and methods with multiple objective functions. Math Program 1:239-66 CrossRef
  28. Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding nonconvex optimization and its applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht
  29. Roy B, Bouyssou D (1993) Aide multicritèree à la décision: méthodes et cas. Economica, Paris
  30. Santhanam R, Kyparisis J (1995) A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection. Comput Oper Res 22(8):807-18 CrossRef
  31. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
  32. Sharpe LJ (eds) (1995) The government of world cities: the future of the metro model. Wiley, Chichester
  33. Srinivas N, Deb K (1995) Multiobjective function optimization using nondominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 2(3):221-48 CrossRef
  34. Stummer C, Heidenberger K (2003) Interactive R&D portfolio analysis with project interdependencies and time profiles of multiple objectives. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 50(2):175-83 CrossRef
  35. Talias MA (2007) Optimal decision indices for R&D project evaluation in the pharmaceutical industry: Pearson index versus Gittins index. Eur J Oper Res 177(2):1105-112 CrossRef
  36. Vincke Ph (1992) Multicriteria decision-aid. Wiley, New York
  37. Zuluaga A, Sefair JA, Medaglia AL (2007) Model for the selection and scheduling of interdependent projects. Systems and information engineering design symposium, 2007. SIEDS 2007, IEEE 27-7 April 2007, pp 1-
  
• 作者单位：Ivan Blecic (1)
  Arnaldo Cecchini (1)
  Clara Pusceddu (1)
  
  1. LAMP, Laboratory of Analysis and Models for Planning, Department of Architecture and Planning, University of Sassari, Piazza Duomo 6, 07041, Alghero, Italy
  
• ISSN：1866-1505

文摘

Strategic urban and territorial planning typically suggests general lines, directions and strategic objectives for spatial, social and economical development of a city or a region with 15-0?years horizon. It also proposes an interrelated set of actions and projects which need to be undertaken and implemented in order to reach these strategic objectives. However, it is frequently unclear how and with what priority these actions and projects should effectively be implemented. Many existing tools and methods address problems such as project portfolio ranking and ordering, but various supplementary constraints or combinatorial aspects like project interdependencies increase the complexity of the problem. This paper presents a multi-objective evaluation model, and its related software tool, for project selection and prioritisation. The model tries to take into account the complexity of urban and territorial policy-making, yet allowing decision-makers to understand how the model works and to explore interactively the space of solutions.