A Prioritisation Model Aiding for the Solution of Illegal Buildings Problem

详细信息    查看全文

• 关键词：Illegal buildings problem ; Prioritisation model ; Multicriteria decision making ; TOPSIS method
• 刊名：Lecture Notes in Computer Science
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：9786
• 期：1
• 页码：193-206
• 全文大小：146 KB
• 参考文献：1.Patton, C.V. (ed.): Spontaneous Shelter: International Perspectives and Prospects. Temple University Press, Philadelphia (1988)
  2.European Environment Agency: SOER 2015 – The European environment state and outlook 2015 (2015). www.​eea.​europa.​eu/​soer
  3.Potsiou C.: Informal Urban Development in Europe. Experiences from Albania and Greece. Summary version. UN-HABITAT (2010)
  4.Forte, F.: The management of informal settlements for urban sustainability: experiences from the Campania Region (Italy). In: Brebbia, C.A., Florez-Escobar, W.F. (eds.) The Sustainable City X, pp. 153–164. WIT Press, Southampton (2015)CrossRef
  5.Nesticò, A., Macchiaroli, M., Pipolo, O.: Costs and benefits in the recovery of historic buildings: the application of an economic model. Sustainability 7(11), 14661–14676 (2015)CrossRef
  6.Bellia, C., Granata, M.F., Scavone, V.: Aree dismesse ed orti urbani: un “valore sociale complesso” nelle città - Abandoned areas and urban gardens: a “complex social value” in the cities. Agribusiness Paesaggio & Ambiente vol. 17, pp. 61–70 (2014). Special Issue 2
  7.Nesticò, A., Pipolo, O.: A protocol for sustainable building interventions: financial analysis and environmental effects. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. 10(3), 199–212 (2015)CrossRef
  8.Fusco Girard, L., Cerreta, M., De Toro, P., Forte, F.: The human sustainable city: values, approaches and evaluative tools. In: Deakin M., Mitchell G., Nijkamp P., Vreeker R. (eds.) Sustainable Urban Development. The Environmental Assessment Methods, vol. 2, pp. 65–93, Routledge (2007)
  9.Granata, M.F.: Economia eco-sistemica ed efficienza bio-architettonica della città. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2008)
  10.Cilona, T., Granata, M.F.: Multicriteria prioritization for multistage implementation of complex urban renewal projects. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Gavrilova, M.L., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9157, pp. 3–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRef
  11.Cilona, T., Granata, M.F.: A Choquet integral based assessment model of projects of urban neglected areas: a case of study. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8581, pp. 90–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
  12.ISTAT-CNEL: Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. ISTAT (2014)
  13.Economic Commission for Europe, In Search for Sustainable Solutions for Informal Settlements in the ECE Region: Challenges and Policy Responses, unedited draft, Geneva (2008)
  14.De Mare, G., Fasolino, I., Ferrara, B.: Abusivismo edilizio: ipotesi metodologica di rifunzionalizzazione urbana, E-STIMO, pp. 1–15 (2010). online journal
  15.De Biase, C., Forte, F., Unauthorised building and financial recovery of urban areas: evidences from Caserta Area. In: 6th EuroMed Conference book of proceedings, pp. 816–831. EuroMed Press, Estoril (2013)
  16.Forte, F.: Illegal buildings and local finance in new metropolitan perspectives. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. Advanced Engineering Forum, vol. 11, pp. 600–606 (2014). www.​scientific.​net
  17.Guitouni, A., Martel, J.-M.: Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109, 501–521 (1998)CrossRef MATH
  18.De Mare, G., Granata, M.F., Nesticò, A.: Weak and strong compensation for the prioritization of public investments: multidimensional analysis for pools. Sustainability 7, 16022–16038 (2015)CrossRef
  19.Livingston, M.A., Monateri, P.G., Parisi, F.: The Italian Legal System. An Introduction, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2015)CrossRef
  20.Hwang, C.-L., Youn, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Application: A State of the Art Survey. Springer, New York (1981)CrossRef
  21.Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S.K., Yazdani, M., et al.: A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 13051–13069 (2012)CrossRef
  22.Abedi, M., Norouzi, G.-H.: A general framework of TOPSIS method for integration of airborne geophysics, satellite imagery, geochemical and geological data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 46, 31–44 (2016)CrossRef
  23.Wang, P., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y.: A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design. Inf. Sci. 345, 27–45 (2016)CrossRef
  24.Onat, N.C., Gumus, S., Kucukvar, M., Tatari, O.: Application of the TOPSIS and intuitionistic fuzzy set approaches for ranking the life cycle sustainability performance of alternative vehicle technologies. Sustain. Prod. Consumption 6, 12–25 (2016)CrossRef
  25.Mandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., Benkovic, S.: Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Econ. Model. 43, 30–37 (2014)CrossRef
  26.Bilbao-Terol, A., Arenas-Parra, M., Cañal-Fernández, V., Antomil-Ibias, J.: Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds. Omega 49, 1–17 (2014)CrossRef
  27.Sekhar, C., Patwardhan, M., Vyas, V.: A Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS based framework for the prioritization of intellectual capital indicators: a SMEs perspective. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 189, 275–284 (2015)CrossRef
  28.Zhao, J., Fang, Z.: Research on campus bike path planning scheme evaluation based on TOPSIS method: Wei’shui campus bike path planning as an example. Procedia Eng. 137, 858–866 (2016)CrossRef
  29.Assari, A., Mahesh, T., Assari, E.: Role of public participation in sustainability of historical city: usage of TOPSIS method. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 5(3), 2289–2294 (2012)
  30.Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C.L.: Multiple attribute decision making. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (1995)CrossRef
  31.Barron, F., Barrett, B.E.: Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Manage. Sci. 42, 1515–1523 (1996)CrossRef MATH
  32.Solymosi, T., Dompi, J.: Method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 26, 35–41 (1985)MathSciNet CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Fabiana Forte (22)
  Maria Fiorella Granata (23)
  Antonio Nesticò (24)
  
  22. Department of Architecture and Industrial Design “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Second University of Naples, Abazia di S. Lorenzo Ad Septimum, 81031, Aversa, CE, Italy
  23. Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze - building 14, 90128, Palermo, Italy
  24. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084, Fisciano, SA, Italy
  
• 丛书名：Computational Science and Its Applications ¨C ICCSA 2016
• ISBN：978-3-319-42085-1
• 刊物类别：Computer Science
• 刊物主题：Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
  Computer Communication Networks
  Software Engineering
  Data Encryption
  Database Management
  Computation by Abstract Devices
  Algorithm Analysis and Problem Complexity
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1611-3349
• 卷排序：9786

文摘

In Italy, especially in the southern areas, illegal buildings and unauthorized settlements are serious and very old problems that remain unsolved in spite of three building amnesties. As a consequence, local authorities have to face the demolition of an enormous number of buildings, as prescribed by the Italian law. Being possible the execution of only a certain number of demolition orders during a short period due to financial and social reasons, the problem of how to select the buildings arises. This worrying situation had become the object of a special bill giving elements to establish priorities for demolition of illegal buildings. In this work we propose a multicriteria model aimed at giving a rational ranking of buildings on which a demolition order lays on. It is based on TOPSIS method and, given the only database with information on buildings; it is able to provide the competent authority with priority for building work demolitions according to the bill.