Life-cycle based design of mass dampers for the Chilean region and its application for the evaluation of the effectiveness of tuned liquid dampers with floating roof

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Rafael Ruiz ; Alexandros A. Taflanidis…
• 关键词：Mass dampers ; Tuned liquid damper with floating roof ; Life ; cycle performance ; Multi ; objective design ; Chilean seismic risk
• 刊名：Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：14
• 期：3
• 页码：943-970
• 全文大小：1,054 KB
• 参考文献：Almazan JL, Cerda FA, De la Liera JC, Lopez-Garcia D (2007) Linear isolation of stainless steel legged thin-walled tanks. Eng Struct 29(7):1596–1611CrossRef
  Ang H-SA, Lee J-C (2001) Cost optimal design of R/C buildings. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 73:233–238CrossRef
  Balendra T, Wang CM, Rakesh G (1999) Vibration control of various types of buildings using TLCD. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 83(1):197–208CrossRef
  Boroschek R, Contreras V (2012) Strong ground motion form the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule Chile earthquake and attenuation relations for Chilean subduction zone interface earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake, Tokyo, Japan.
  Bozorgnia Y, Bertero V (2004) Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-based Engineering. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRef
  Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A (2004) Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:815–828CrossRef
  Cha EJ, Ellingwood BR (2012) Risk-averse decision-making for civil infrastructure exposed to low-probability, high-consequence events. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 104:27–35CrossRef
  Chakraborty S, Roy BK (2011) Reliability based optimum design of tuned mass damper in seismic vibration control of structures with bounded uncertain parameters. Probab Eng Mech 26(2):215–221CrossRef
  Chang CC (1999) Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control. Eng Struct 21:454–463CrossRef
  Coello CAC, Van Veldhuizen DA, Lamont GB (2002) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems, vol 242. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
  Daniel Y, Lavan O (2014) Gradient based optimal seismic retrofitting of 3D irregular buildings using multiple tuned mass dampers. Comput Struct 139:84–97CrossRef
  De Angelis M, Perno S, Reggio A (2012) Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(1):41–60CrossRef
  De la Llera JC, Lüders C, Leigh P, Sady H (2004) Analysis, testing, and implementation of seismic isolation of buildings in Chile. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(5):543–574CrossRef
  Debbarma R, Chakraborty S, Ghosh S (2010) Unconditional reliability-based design of tuned liquid column dampers under stochastic earthquake load considering system parameters uncertainties. J Earthq Eng 14(7):970–988CrossRef
  Den Hartog JP (1947) Mechanical vibrations. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York
  EERI Special Earthquake Report (2010) Learning from earthquakes: the Mw 8.8 Chile earthquake of February 27, 2010. Earthq Eng Res Inst Newsl 44(6)
  FEMA-P-58 (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings. American Technology Council, Redwood City
  Fragiadakis M, Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M (2006) Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost. Struct Multidiscip Optim 32:1–11CrossRef
  Fujino Y, Sun L, Pacheco BM, Chaiseri P (1992) Tuned liquid damper (TLD) for suppressing horizontal motion of structures. J Eng Mech 118(10):2017–2030CrossRef
  Gidaris I, Taflanidis AA (2015) Performance assessment and optimization of fluid viscous dampers through life-cycle cost criteria and comparison to alternative design approaches. Bull Earthq Eng 13(4):1003–1028CrossRef
  Gidaris I, Taflanidis AA, Mavroeidis GP (2014) Multi-objective design of fluid viscous dampers using life-cycle cost criteria. In: 10th national conference in earthquake engineering, Anchorage.
  Goulet CA, Haselton CB, Mitrani-Reiser J, Beck JL, Deierlein G, Porter KA, Stewart JP (2007) Evaluation of the seismic performance of code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building-From seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(13):1973–1997CrossRef
  Hitchcock PA, Kwok KCS, Watkins RD, Samali B (1997) Characteristics of liquid column mass dampers (LCVA)-II. Eng Struct 19(2):135–144CrossRef
  Hoang N, Fujino Y, Warnitchai P (2008) Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas. Eng Struct 30(3):707–715CrossRef
  Housner GW (1957) Dynamic pressures on accelerated fluid containers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 47(1):15–35
  Jalayer F, Beck JL (2008) Effects of two alternative representations of ground-motion uncertainty in probabilistic seismic demand assessment of structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(1):61–79CrossRef
  Kaneko S, Mizota Y (2000) Dynamical modeling of deepwater-type cylindrical tuned liquid damper with a submerged net. J Press Vessel Technol 122(1):96–104CrossRef
  Kareem A (1990) Reduction of wind induced motion utilizing a tuned sloshing damper. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 36:725–737CrossRef
  Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1137–1145
  Lee CS, Goda K, Hong HP (2012) Effectiveness of using tuned-mass dampers in reducing seismic risk. Struct Infrastruct Eng 8(2):141–156CrossRef
  Leyton F, Ruiz S, Sepúlveda SA (2009) Preliminary re-evaluation of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Chile: from Arica to Taitao Peninsula. Adv Geosci 22(22):147–153CrossRef
  Lin C-C, Chen C-L, Wang J-F (2010) Vibration control of structures with initially accelerated passive tuned mass dampers under near-fault earthquake excitation. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 25(1):69–75CrossRef
  Love JS, Tait MJ (2010) Nonlinear simulation of a tuned liquid damper with damping screens using a modal expansion technique. J Fluids Struct 26(7):1058–1077CrossRef
  Marano GC, Greco R, Trentadue F, Chiaia B (2007) Constrained reliability-based optimization of linear tuned mass dampers for seismic control. Int J Solids Struct 44(22–23):7370–7388CrossRef
  Marian L, Giaralis A (2014) Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems. Probab Eng Mech 38:156–164CrossRef
  Marler RT, Arora JS (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26:369–395CrossRef
  Matta E (2011) Performance of tuned mass dampers against near-field earthquakes. Struct Eng Mech 39(5):621–642CrossRef
  Matta E, De Stefano A (2009) Seismic performance of pendulum and translational roof-garden TMDs. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(3):908–921CrossRef
  Matta E, De Stefano A, Spencer BF (2009) A new passive rolling pendulum-vibration absorber using a non-axial-symmetrical guide to achieve bidirectional tuning. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(15):1729–1750CrossRef
  Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2004) Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(9):1023–1049CrossRef
  Moroni MO, Sarrazin M, Herrera R (2011) Research activities in Chile on base isolation and passive energy dissipation. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on seismic isolation, energy dissipation and active vibration control of structures, Sochi.
  Ordaz MG, Cardona O-D, Salgado-GÃlvez MA, Bernal-Granados GA, Singh SK, Zuloaga-Romero D (2014) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment at global level. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 10:419–427CrossRef
  Papadimitriou K (1990) Stochastic characterization of strong ground motion and application to structural response. Report No. EERL 90-03, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
  Porter KA, Kiremidjian AS, LeGrue JS (2001) Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its use in performance evaluation. Earthq Spectra 18(2):291–312CrossRef
  Porter KA, Kennedy RP, Bachman RE (2007) Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthq Spectra 23(2):471–489CrossRef
  Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthq Spectra 24(1):3–21CrossRef
  Rezaeian S, Der Kiureghian A (2010) Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(10):1155–1180
  Ruiz RO (2015) A new type of tuned liquid damper and its effectiveness in enhancing seismic performance; numerical characterizaiton, experimental validation, parametric analysis and life-cycle based design. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago
  Ruiz RO, Lopez-Garcia D, Taflanidis AA (2015a) An efficient computational procedure for the dynamic analysis of liquid storage tanks. Eng Struct 85:206–218CrossRef
  Ruiz RO, Lopez-Garcia D, Taflanidis AA (2015b) Modeling and experimental validation of a new type of tuned liquid damper Acta Mechan. doi:10.​1007/​s00707-015-1536-7
  Ruiz RO, Lopez-Garcia D, Taflanidis AA (2015c) Tuned liquid damper with floating roof: A new device to control earthquake-induced vibrations in structures. In: XI Congreso Chileno de Sismologia e Ingenieria Sismica, Santiago.
  Sakai F, Takaeda S, Tamaki T (1989) Tuned liquid column damper-new type device for suppression of building vibrations. In: Proceedings of the international conference of high-rise buildings, Nanjing. pp 926–931
  Salvi J, Rizzi E, Gavazzeni M (2014) Analysis on the optimum performance of tuned mass damper devices in the context of earthquake engineering. In: EURODYN 2014-IX international conference on structural dynamics, Porto, Portugal, 30 June–2 July. Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Engenharia, FEUP, pp 1729–1736
  Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Staedtke H (2006) The estimation of minimum-misfit stochastic models from empirical ground-motion prediction equations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(2):427–445CrossRef
  Shin H, Singh MP (2014) Minimum failure cost-based energy dissipation system designs for buildings in three seismic regions Part II: Application to viscous dampers. Eng Struct 74:275–282CrossRef
  Soto MG, Adeli H (2013) Tuned mass dampers. Arch Comput Methods Eng 20(4):419–431CrossRef
  Spall JC (2003) Introduction to stochastic search and optimization. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkCrossRef
  Taflanidis AA, Beck JL (2009) Life-cycle cost optimal design of passive dissipative devices. Struct Saf 31(6):508–522CrossRef
  Taflanidis AA, Beck JL, Angelides DA (2007) Robust reliability-based design of liquid column mass dampers under earthquake excitation using an analytical reliability approximation. Eng Struct 29(12):3525–3537CrossRef
  Tait MJ, Isyumov N, El Damatty AA (2007) Effectiveness of a 2D TLD and its numerical modeling. J Struct Eng 133(2):251–263CrossRef
  Tributsch A, Adam C (2012) Evaluation and analytical approximation of tuned mass damper performance in an earthquake environment. Smart Struct Syst 10(2):155–179CrossRef
  Tse KT, Kwok KCS, Tamura Y (2012) Performance and cost evaluation of a smart tuned mass damper for suppressing wind-induced lateral-torsional motion of tall structures. J Struct Eng 138(4):514–525
  Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2005) Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multidegree-of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation 1. J Struct Eng 131(4):589–599CrossRef
  Vetter CR, Taflanidis AA, Mavroeidis GP (2015) Tuning of stochastic ground motion models for compatibility with ground motion prediction equations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. doi:10.​1002/​eqe.​2690
  Wang D, Tse TKT, Zhou Y, Li Q (2015) Structural performance and cost analysis of wind-induced vibration control schemes for a real super-tall building. Struct Infrastruct Eng 11(8):990–1011CrossRef
  Wong KK (2008) Seismic energy dissipation of inelastic structures with tuned mass dampers. J Eng Mech
  Zemp R, de la Llera JC, Roschke P (2011) Tall building vibration control using a TM-MR damper assembly: Experimental results and implementation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40(3):257–271CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Rafael Ruiz (1) (2)
  Alexandros A. Taflanidis (1)
  Diego Lopez-Garcia (2) (3)
  Christopher R. Vetter (1)
  
  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA
  2. Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  3. National Research Center for Integrated Natural Disaster Management CONICYT/FONDAP/15110017, Santiago, Chile
  
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：Earth sciences
  Geotechnical Engineering
  Civil Engineering
  Geophysics and Geodesy
  Hydrogeology
  Structural Geology
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-1456

文摘

The assessment of the effectiveness of mass dampers for the Chilean region within a multi-objective decision framework utilizing life-cycle performance criteria is considered in this paper. The implementation of this framework focuses here on the evaluation of the potential as a cost-effective protection device of a recently proposed liquid damper, called tuned liquid damper with floating roof (TLD-FR). The TLD-FR maintains the advantages of traditional tuned liquid dampers (TLDs), i.e. low cost, easy tuning, alternative use of water, while establishing a linear and generally more robust/predictable damper behavior (than TLDs) through the introduction of a floating roof. At the same time it suffers (like all other liquid dampers) from the fact that only a portion of the total mass contributes directly to the vibration suppression, reducing its potential effectiveness when compared to traditional tuned mass dampers. A life-cycle design approach is investigated here for assessing the compromise between these two features, i.e. reduced initial cost but also reduced effectiveness (and therefore higher cost from seismic losses), when evaluating the potential for TLD-FRs for the Chilean region. Leveraging the linear behavior of the TLD-FR a simple parameterization of the equations of motion is established, enabling the formulation of a design framework that beyond TLDs-FR is common for other type of linear mass dampers, something that supports a seamless comparison to them. This framework relies on a probabilistic characterization of the uncertainties impacting the seismic performance. Quantification of this performance through time-history analysis is considered and the seismic hazard is described by a stochastic ground motion model that is calibrated to offer hazard-compatibility with ground motion prediction equations available for Chile. Two different criteria related to life-cycle performance are utilized in the design optimization, in an effort to support a comprehensive comparison between the examined devices. The first one, representing overall direct benefits, is the total life-cycle cost of the system, composed of the upfront device cost and the anticipated seismic losses over the lifetime of the structure. The second criterion, incorporating risk-averse concepts into the decision making, is related to consequences (repair cost) with a specific probability of exceedance over the lifetime of the structure. A multi-objective optimization is established and stochastic simulation is used to estimate all required risk measures. As an illustrative example, the performance of different mass dampers placed on a 21-story building in the Santiago area is examined. Keywords Mass dampers Tuned liquid damper with floating roof Life-cycle performance Multi-objective design Chilean seismic risk