The good, the bad and the ugly: on the interactions among experience, exposure and commitment with reference to landslide risk perception in México
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Karina Landeros-Mugica ; Javier Urbina-Soria ; Irasema Alcántara-Ayala
- 关键词：Risk perception ; Landslides ; Exposed communities ; Experience ; Preparedness ; Commitment ; Disaster ; Risk reduction
- 刊名：Natural Hazards
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：February 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：80
- 期：3
- 页码：1515-1537
- 全文大小：1,930 KB
- 参考文献：Albalá-Bertrand JM (1993) Political economy of large natural disasters: with special reference to developing countries. Oxford University Press, London
Alcántara-Ayala I (2002) Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphology 47:107–124CrossRef
Alcántara-Ayala I (2004a) Flowing mountains in Mexico: incorporating local knowledge and initiatives to confront disaster and promote prevention. Mt Res Dev 24:10–13CrossRef
Alcántara-Ayala I (2004b) Hazard assessment of rainfall induced landsliding in Mexico. Geomorphology 61:19–40CrossRef
Alcántara-Ayala I (2008) On the historical account of disastrous landslides in Mexico: the challenge of risk management and disaster prevention. Adv Geosci 14:159–164 ISSN 1680-7340 CrossRef
Alcántara-Ayala I, Garnica RJ (2013) Landslide monitoring and warning systems in Mexico. In: Sassa K (ed) Landslides: global risk preparedness, international consortium on landslides. Springer, Germany, pp 299–314CrossRef
Alcántara-Ayala I, Oliver-Smith A (2015) The necessity of early warning articulated systems (EWASs): critical issues beyond response. In: Sudmeier-Rieux K, Fernandez M, Penna I, Jaboyedoff M, Gaillard JC (eds) Linking sustainable development, disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation and migration. Springer, Berlin (in press)
Alcántara-Ayala I, Altan O, Baker D, Briceño S, Cutter S, Gupta H, Holloway A, Ismail-Zadeh A, Jiménez Díaz V, Johnston D, McBean G, Ogawa Y, Paton D, Porio E, Silbereisen R, Takeuchi K, Valsecchi G, Vogel C, Wu G, Zhai P (2015) Disaster risks research and assessment to promote risk reduction and management. In: Ismail-Zadeh A, Cutter S (eds) ICSU-ISSC ad hoc group on disaster risk assessment. Paris. http://www.icsu.org/science-for-policy/disaster-risk/documents/DRRsynthesisPaper_2015.pdf
Bachri S, Stötter J, Monreal M, Sartohadi J (2015) The calamity of eruptions, or an eruption of benefits? Mt. Bromo human–volcano system a case study of an open-risk perception. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:277–290. doi:10.5194/nhess-15-277-2015 CrossRef
Bird DK, Gísladóttir G (2012) Residents’ attitudes and behaviour before and after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruptions—a case study from southern Iceland. Bull Volcanol 74(6):1263–1279CrossRef
Birkholz S, Muro M, Jeffrey P, Smith HM (2014) Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. Sci Total Environ 478:12–20CrossRef
Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo
Bitrán D, Reyes C (2000) Evaluación del impacto económico de las inundaciones ocurridas en octubre de 1999 en el estado de Puebla. In: Bitrán D (ed) Evaluación del impacto socioeconómico de los principales desastres naturales ocurridos en la República Mexicana durante 1999. Cuadernos de Investigación 50. CENAPRED, México, pp 161–194
Bjønness IM (1986) Mountain hazard perception and risk-avoiding strategies among the Sherpas of KhumbuHimal, Nepal. Mt Res Dev 6(4):277–292CrossRef
Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, London
Burton I (1997) Vulnerability and adaptive responses in the context of climate and climate change. Clim Change 36:185–196CrossRef
Burton I, Kates RW (1964) The perception of natural hazards in resource management. Nat Resour J III(3):412–441
Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1978) The environment as hazard. Oxford University Press, New York
Cannon T (1993) A hazard need not a disaster make: vulnerability and the causes of ‘natural’ disasters. In: Merriman PA, Browitt CWA (eds) Natural disasters: protecting vulnerable communities. Thomas Telford, London, pp 92–105
Cannon T (1994) Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of natural disasters. In: Varley A (ed) Disasters development and environment. Wiley, Chichester, pp 13–30
Cutter SL (1993) Living with risk. Edward Arnold, London
Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4):529–539CrossRef
Cutter SL, Ismail-Zadeh A, Alcántara-Ayala I, Altan O, Baker DN, Briceño S, Gupta H, Holloway A, Johnston D, McBean GA, Ogawa Y, Paton D, Porio E, Silbereisen RK, Takeuchi K, Valsecchi GB, Vogel C, Wu G (2015) Global risks: pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature 522:277–279CrossRef
Damm A, Eberhard K, Sendzimir J, Patt A (2013) Perception of landslides risk and responsibility: a case study in eastern Styria, Austria. Nat Hazards 69(1):165–183CrossRef
Dietz T, Stern PC, Guangano GA (1998) Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environ Behav 30(4):450–471CrossRef
Dillard A, McCaul W, Klein W (2006) Unrealistic optimism in smokers: implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation. J Health Commun 11:93–102CrossRef
Finlay PJ, Fell R (1997) Landslides: risk perception and acceptance. Can Geotech J 34(2):169–188CrossRef
Goleman D (1985) La Psicología del Autoengaño. Buenos Aires, Paidós
Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38(1–2):101–120. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6 CrossRef
Gurung SM (1989) Human perception of mountain hazards in the Kakani–Kathmandu area: Experiences from the middle mountains of Nepal. Mt Res Dev 9(4):353–364CrossRef
Halpern-Felsher BL, Millstein SG, Ellen JM, Adler NE, Tschann JM, Biehl M (2001) The role of behavioral experience in judging risks. Health Psychol 20(2):120–126CrossRef
Helweg-Larsen M (1999) (The lack of) optimistic biases in response on the Northridge earthquake: the role of personal experience. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 21:19–129CrossRef
Hewitt K, Burton I (1971) The hazardousness of a place: a regional ecology of damaging events. Department of Geography Research publication 6. University of Toronto, Toronto
Hyogo Framework for Action (2005) http://www.unisdr.org/2005/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/Hyogo-framework-for-action-english.pdf
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner GK, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) A special report of working Groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Johnson BP (1993) Advancing understanding of knowledge’s role in lay risk perception. Risk—Issues Health Saf 4:189–211
Jones EC, Faas AJ, Murphy AD, Tobin GA, Whiteford LM, McCArty C (2013) Cross-cultural and site-based influences on demographic, well-being, and social network predictors of risk perception in hazard and disaster settings in Ecuador and Mexico. Hum Nat 24:5–32CrossRef
Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T, Vanneuville W, De Maeyer P (2011) An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast. Risk Anal 31(7):1055–1068CrossRef
Levitt JI, Whitaker MC (2009) Introduction: “Truth Crushed to Earth Will Rise Again”: Katrina and its aftermath. In: Levitt JI (ed) Hurricane Katrina, America’s unnatural disaster. University of Nebraska Press, USA, pp 1–21
Lin S, Shaw D, Ho MC (2008) Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public? Nat Hazards 44(2):305–314CrossRef
López-Vázquez E (2009) Risk perception and coping strategies for risk from Popocatepetl volcano, Mexico. Geofís Int 48(1):133–147
Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63:299–306CrossRef
McDaniels TL (1998) Ten propositions for untangling descriptive and prescriptive lessons in risk perception findings. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 59:129–134CrossRef
McLaughlin P, Dietz T (2008) Structure, agency and environment: toward an integrated perspective on vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 18(1):99–111CrossRef
Mei ETW, Lavigne F, Picquout A, De Bélizal E, Brunstein D, Grancher D, Sartohadi J, Cholik N, Vidal C (2013) Lessons learned from the 2010 evacuations at Merapi volcano. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 261:342–359CrossRef
Mendoza MJ, Noriega I, Domínguez L (2000) Deslizamientos de laderas en Teziutlán, Pue., provocados por las lluvias intensas de octubre de 1999. SEGOB, CENAPRED, México
Meng B, Liu M, Liufu HY, Wang W (2013) Risk perceptions combining spatial multi-criteria analysis in land-use type of Huainan city. Saf Sci 51(1):361–373CrossRef
Mileti DS (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States, natural hazards and disasters. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC
Mimura N, Yasuhara K, Kawagone S, Yokoki H, Kazama S (2011) Damage from the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami—a quick report. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 16(7):803–818CrossRef
Muñoz DM, Romero A (2013) Los riesgos naturales y su percepción en el municipio de Mazarrón (Murcia). Papeles de geografía 57:179–195
Nathan F (2008) Risk perception, risk management and vulnerability to landslides in the hill slopes in the city of La Paz, Bolivia. A preliminary statement. Disasters 32(3):337–357. doi:10.1111/j.0361-3666.2008.01043.x CrossRef
Oliver-Smith A (1999) What is a disaster? Anthropological perspectives on a persistent question. In: Oliver-Smith A, Hoffman SM (eds) The angry Earth: disaster in anthropological perspective. Routledge, New York, pp 18–34
Oliver-Smith A (2006) Disasters and forced migration in the 21st century. http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Oliver-Smith/ . 15 June 2008
Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, London
Pidgeon N (1998) Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 59:5–15CrossRef
Pilgrim NK (1999) Landslides, risk and decision-making in Kinnaur District: bridging the gap between science and public opinion. Disasters 23(1):45–65CrossRef
Renn O (1998) The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 59:49–62CrossRef
Rico AM, Hernández M, Olcina J, Martínez E (2010) Percepción del riesgo de inundaciones en municipios litorales alicantinos: ¿aumento de la vulnerabilidad? Papeles de geografía 51:245–256
Rosa EA (1998) Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. J Risk Res 1:15–44CrossRef
Saurí D, Ribas A, Lara A, Pavón D (2010) La percepción del riesgo de inundación: experiencias de aprendizaje en la Costa Brava. Papeles de Geografía 51:269–278
Sjöberg L (2000) Perceived risk and tampering with nature. J Risk Res 3(4):353–367. doi:10.1080/13669870050132568 CrossRef
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285CrossRef
Slovic P, Weber EU (2002) Perception of risk posed by extreme events. In: The conference on risk management strategies in an uncertain world held in April 12–13, Palisades, New York
Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1982) Why study risk perception? Risk Anal 2(2):83–93CrossRef
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24(2):311–322CrossRef
Solana MC, Kilburn CR (2003) Public awareness of landslide hazards: the Barranco deTirajana, Gran Canaria, Spain. Geomorphology 54(1):39–48CrossRef
Spittal MJ, McClure J, Siegert RJ, Walkey FH (2005) Optimistic bias in relation to preparedness for earthquakes. Australas J Disaster Trauma Stud 1:1–10
Takeuchi K, Chavoshian A (2011) Quick report of Great Eastern Japan earthquake and tsunami (As of 22 April 2011). International Centre for Water Hazard and Risk Management, ICHARM-UNESCO, Tsukuba, Japan, pp 305–8516. http://www.iwra.org/doc/Tsunami_report_Kuniyoshi_Takeuchi_ICHARM.pdf
Tobin GA, Montz BE (1997) Natural hazards: explanation and integration. The Guilford Press, New York
Tobin GA, Whiteford LM, Jones EC, Murphy AD, Garren SJ, Padros CV (2011) The role of individual well-being in risk perception and evacuation for chronic vs. acute natural hazards in Mexico. Appl Geogr 31(2):700–711CrossRef
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1982) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 163–189CrossRef
UNISDR (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives, 2 vols. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. United Nations, Geneva
UNISDR (2009) Terminology on disaster risk reduction. www.unisdr.org/eng/terminology/UNISDR-terminology-2009-eng.pdf
UNISDR (2011) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2011, revealing risk, redefining development. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2011/en/home/download.html
UNISDR (2012) Impacts of disasters since the 1992 Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit Impacts of Disasters since the 1992 Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit. http://www.unisdr.org/files/27162_infographic.pdf
UNISDR (2013) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), Geneva. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2013/en/gar-pdf
UNISDR (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), Geneva. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf
Van Der Veen A, Logtmeijer C (2005) Economic hotspots: visualizing vulnerability to flooding. Nat Hazards 36(1–2):65–80CrossRef
Van Manen SM (2014) Hazard and risk perception at Turrialba volcano (Costa Rica) implications for disaster risk management. Appl Geogr 50:63–73CrossRef
Vlek CA (1996) A multi-level, multi-stage and multi-attribute perspective on risk assessment, decision-making, and risk control. Risk Decis Policy 1(1):9–31CrossRef
Wagner K (2007) Mental models of flash floods and landslides. Risk Anal 27:671–682. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00916.x CrossRef
Weinstein ND (1980) Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(5):806–820CrossRef
Weinstein ND (1989) Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science 246:1232–1233CrossRef
White GF (1973) Natural hazards research. In: Chorley RJ (ed) Directions in geography. Methuen, London, pp 193–216 - 作者单位：Karina Landeros-Mugica (1)
Javier Urbina-Soria (1)
Irasema Alcántara-Ayala (2)
1. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3004, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Coyoacán, Mexico, D.F., Mexico
2. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Coyoacán, Mexico, D.F., Mexico - 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
- 刊物主题：Earth sciences
Hydrogeology
Geophysics and Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Environmental Management - 出版者：Springer Netherlands
- ISSN：1573-0840
文摘
Risk perception plays a significant role not only in terms of behaviour, but as a basic element for enhancing awareness and preparedness and achieving disaster risk management. Disasters are produced by the combination of hazards and the different dimensions of vulnerability. Recognizing the social and cognitive construction of risk turns out to be a requirement for the identification and implementation of adequate strategies for risk awareness and preparedness and hence for reducing vulnerability of communities exposed to hazards. As risk perception has not been yet taken into account as a baseline for delineating strategies for disaster prevention in México, in this paper, attention is paid to the relationships among the different realms of landslide risk perception—as a function of hazard exposure, experiences and commitment to disaster risk reduction—so that outcomes can be incorporated into future risk management agendas. This approach was applied in Teziutlán, Puebla, a municipality historically affected by mass movement processes. The findings of this research provide significant evidence to argue that previous experience and exposure to risk affect the perception of people and also influence the patterns associated with preventive and coping actions. Identifying specific characteristics of population segments within the context of risk perception is useful for tailoring public policies, mitigation strategies and integrated disaster risk reduction efforts. Keywords Risk perception Landslides Exposed communities Experience Preparedness Commitment Disaster Risk reduction