Status and prospects of investigations into the collinear cluster decay of heavy nuclei
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Yu. V. Pyatkov (1) (2)
D. V. Kamanin (2)
A. A. Alexandrov (2)
I. A. Alexandrova (2)
N. Mkaza (3)
V. E. Zhuchko (2)
N. A. Kondratyev (2)
E. A. Kuznetsova (2)
G. V. Mishinsky (2)
V. Malaza (3)
A. O. Strekalovsky (2)
O. V. Strekalovsky (2) - 刊名：Physics of Atomic Nuclei
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：December 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：77
- 期：12
- 页码：1518-1524
- 全文大小：628 KB
- 参考文献：1. E. Piasecki et al., Nucl. Phys. A <strong class="a-plus-plus">255strong>, 387 (1975). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(75)90687-9" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
2. W. J. Swiatecki, in / Proceedings of the 2nd UN Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 1958 (United Nations, Geneva, 1958), Vol. 15, p. 651.
3. V.M. Strutinsky et al., Nucl. Phys. <strong class="a-plus-plus">46strong>, 639 (1963). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(63)90635-7" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
4. H. Diehl and W. Greiner, Phys. Lett. B <strong class="a-plus-plus">45strong>, 35 (1973). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(73)90246-3" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
5. H. Diehl and W. Greiner, Nucl. Phys. A <strong class="a-plus-plus">229strong>, 29 (1974). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(74)90673-3" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
6. D. N. Poenaru et al., Phys. Rev. C <strong class="a-plus-plus">59strong>, 3457 (1999). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.59.3457" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
7. R. B. Tashkhodjaev et al., Eur. Phys. J. A <strong class="a-plus-plus">47strong>, 136 (2011). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2011-11136-x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
8. K. Manimaran et al., Phys. Rev. C <strong class="a-plus-plus">83strong>, 034609 (2011). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034609" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
9. K. Manimaran et al., Eur. Phys. J. A <strong class="a-plus-plus">45strong>, 239 (2010). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2010-11000-7" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
10. V. I. Zagrebaev et al., Phys. Rev. C <strong class="a-plus-plus">81strong>, 044608 (2010). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044608" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
11. K. R. Vijayaraghavan et al., Eur. Phys. J. A <strong class="a-plus-plus">48strong>, 27 (2012). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12027-4" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
12. H.-G. Ortlepp et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A <strong class="a-plus-plus">403strong>, 65 (1998). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00777-8" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
13. Yu. V. Pyatkov et al., Eur. Phys. J. A <strong class="a-plus-plus">45strong>, 29 (2010). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2010-10988-8" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
14. Yu. V. Pyatkov et al., Eur. Phys. J. A <strong class="a-plus-plus">48strong>, 94 (2012). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12094-5" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
15. Yu. V. Pyatkov et al., in / Proceedings of the International Conference of Nuclear Physics Nuclear Shells鈥?0 Years, Ed. by Yu. Ts. Oganessian et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000), p. 301.
16. Yu. V. Pyatkov (for FOBOS and HENDES Collabs.), Int. J. Mod. Phys. E <strong class="a-plus-plus">17strong>, 2226 (2008). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218301308011380" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
17. D. V. Kamanin and Yu. V. Pyatkov, Lect. Notes Phys. <strong class="a-plus-plus">875strong>, 183 (2014). ss="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01077-9_6" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef - 作者单位：Yu. V. Pyatkov (1) (2)
D. V. Kamanin (2)
A. A. Alexandrov (2)
I. A. Alexandrova (2)
N. Mkaza (3)
V. E. Zhuchko (2)
N. A. Kondratyev (2)
E. A. Kuznetsova (2)
G. V. Mishinsky (2)
V. Malaza (3)
A. O. Strekalovsky (2)
O. V. Strekalovsky (2)
1. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe sh. 31, Moscow, 115409, Russia
2. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow oblast, 141980, Russia
3. South African Military Academy, Stellenbosch University, Saldanha, 7395, Western Cape, South Africa - ISSN：1562-692X
文摘
Basic experimental results confirming the existence a new cluster-decay type called collinear cluster tripartition (CCT) are presented. Decays of this type manifest themselves, in particular, as a two-dimensional region of a locally enhanced yield of fragments (bump) that corresponds to specific missing-mass values in the mass-mass distribution of fission fragments. One of the decay modes that contribute to the bump can be treated as a cluster-decay type that is new in relation to the well-known heavy-ion or lead radioactivity. The conclusions drawn from an analysis of correlation mass distributions are confirmed by the results obtained from neutron-gated data, measurements of the nuclear charge for CCT events, and the direct detection of new-decay products.