Research on eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation of the Anning River Basin in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Huaiyong Shao (1) (2)
Meng Liu (1) (2)
Qiufang Shao (1)
Xiaofei Sun (1) (2)
Jinhui Wu (1) (2)
Zhiying Xiang (1) (2)
Wunian Yang (1) (2) - 关键词：Eco ; environmental vulnerability ; The Anning River Basin ; GIS ; RS ; SPCA
- 刊名：Environmental Earth Sciences
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：September 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：72
- 期：5
- 页码：1555-1568
- 全文大小：1,362 KB
- 参考文献：1. Akgun A, K?ncal C, Pradhan B (2012) Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey). Environ Monit Assess 184:5453-470 CrossRef
2. Aryafar A, Yousefi S, Ardejani FD (2013) The weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Environ Earth Sci 68:2313-324 CrossRef
3. Bagdanavi?iūt? I, Valiūnas J (2013) GIS-based land suitability analysis integrating multi-criteria evaluation for the allocation of potential pollution sources. Environ Earth Sci 68:1797-812 CrossRef
4. Cai HS, Liu MS, Chen MQ, Lin LS (2009) Dynamic evaluation of ecological frangibility of Jiangxi Province based on GIS. Bull Soil Water Conserv 29(5):190-96 (in Chinese)
5. Deng LJ, Hou DB, Wang CQ (2003) Study on characteristics of erodibility of natural soil and non-irrigated soil of Sichuan. Soil Water Conserv China 7:23-5 (in Chinese)
6. Donevska KR, Gorsevski PV, Jovanovski M, Pesˇevski I (2012) Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Earth Sci 67:121-31 CrossRef
7. Enea M, Salemi G (2001) Fuzzy approach to the environmental impact evaluation. Ecol Model 135:131-47 CrossRef
8. Farhan AR, Lim S (2012) Vulnerability assessment of ecological conditions in Seribu Islands, Indonesia. Ocean Coast Manag 65:1-4 CrossRef
9. Ferrara A, Salvati L, Sateriano A, Nolè A (2012) Performance evaluation and cost assessment of a key indicator system to monitor desertification vulnerability. Ecol Ind 23:123-29 CrossRef
10. Furlan A, Bonotto DM, Gumiere SJ (2011) Development of environmental and natural vulnerability maps for Brazilian coastal at S?o Sebasti?o in S?o Paulo State. Environ Earth Sci 64:659-69 CrossRef
11. Gómez-Sal A, Belmontes JA, Nicolau JM (2003) Assessing landscape values: a proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecol Model 168:319-41 CrossRef
12. Guan WB, Sun BP, Jiang FQ, Shi DM (1998) Assessment of the ecological vulnerability on sandy desertification in the west of Northeast China. J Beijing For Univ (English Ed.) 1:15-7 (in Chinese)
13. Hall O, Arnberg W (2002) A method for landscape regionalization based on fuzzy membership signatures. Landsc Urban Plan 59:227-40 CrossRef
14. He HQ, Li SC, Sun CL, Yang T (2011) Environmental factors of road slope stability in mountain area using principal component analysis and hierarchy cluster. Environ Earth Sci 62:55-9 CrossRef
15. Huang F, Liu XN, Zhang YZ (2003) GIS-based eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in West Jilin Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica 23(1):95-00 (in Chinese)
16. Huang PH, Tsai JS, Lin WT (2010) Using multiple-criteria decision-making techniques for eco-environmental vulnerability assessment: a case study on the Chi-Jia-Wan Stream watershed, Taiwan. Environ Monit Assess 168:141-58 CrossRef
17. Huang SB, Li X, Wang YX (2012) A new model of geo-environmental impact assessment of mining: a multiple-criteria assessment method integrating Fuzzy-AHP with fuzzy synthetic ranking. Environ Earth Sci 66:275-84 CrossRef
18. Jabbar MT, Zhou XP (2011) Eco-environmental change detection by using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study Basrah province, south part of Iraq. Environ Earth Sci 64:1397-407 CrossRef
19. Jenks GeorgeF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearb Cartogr 7:186-90
20. Jung BC, Choi SI, Du AX, Cuzzocreo JL, Geng ZZ, Ying HS, Perlman SL, Toga AW, Prince JL, Ying SH (2012) Principal component analysis of cerebellar shape on MRI separates SCA types 2 and 6 into two archetypal modes of degeneration. Cerebellum 11:887-95 CrossRef
21. Kangas J, Store R, Leskinen P, Mehtaètalo L (2000) Improving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilising advanced decision-support tools. For Ecol Manag 132(2000):157-71
22. Khatun T (2009) Measuring environmental degradation by using principal component analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 11:439-57 CrossRef
23. Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WA, Moradi A (2012) An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 67:251-64 CrossRef
24. Lavado C, Schnabel S, Gomez GA, Pulido FM (2009) Mapping sensitivity to land degradation in Extremadura, SW Spain. Land Degrad 20:129-44 CrossRef
25. Li AN, Wang AS, Liang SL (2006) Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in mountainous region using remote sensing and GIS—a case study in the upper reaches of Mingjiang River, China. Ecol Model 192:175-87 CrossRef
26. Li L, Shi ZH, Yin W (2009) A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the Danjiangkou Reservoir area, China. Ecol Model 220:3439-447 CrossRef
27. Liang Y, Shi XZ (1999) Soil erodiable K in east hilly fields of the Southern Yangtze River. Res Soil Water Conserv 6(2):47-2 (in Chinese)
28. Liu ZJ, Yu XX, Li L, Huang M (2011) Vulnerability assessment of eco-environment in Yimeng mountainous area of Shandong Province based on SRP conceptual model. Chin J Appl Ecol 22(8):2084-090 (in Chinese)
29. Lv XX, Shen RM (1992) A preliminary study on the values K of soil erosibility factor. J Soil Water Conserv 6(1):63-0 (in Chinese)
30. MacMillan RA, Jones RK, McNabb DH (2004) Defining a hierarchy of spatial entities for environmental analysis and modeling using digital elevation models (DEMs). Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(3):175-00 CrossRef
31. Manfre LA, da Silva AM, Urban RC, Rodgers J (2013) Environmental fragility evaluation and guidelines for environmental zoning: a study case on Ibiuna (the Southeastern Brazilian region). Environ Earth Sci 69:947-57 CrossRef
32. Mao XY, Meng JJ, Xiang YY (2013) Cellular automata-based model for developing land use ecological security patterns in semi-arid areas: a case study of Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China. Environ Earth Sci 70:269-79 CrossRef
33. McMaster, Robert, Susanna (2002) A history of twentieth-century American Academic Cartography. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 29(3):312-15
34. Mortberg UM, Balfors B, Knol WC (2007) Landscape ecological assessment: a tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning. J Environ Manag 82:457-70 CrossRef
35. Munda G, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (1994) Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environment management. Ecol Econ 10(2):97-12 CrossRef
36. Navas JM, Telfer TC, Ross LG (2012) Separability indexes and accuracy of neuro-fuzzy classification in geographic information systems for assessment of coastal environmental vulnerability. Ecol Inform 12:43-9 CrossRef
37. O’Briena K, Lerchenko R, Kelkar U (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Change 14:303-13 CrossRef
38. Pacheco J, Casado S, Porras S (2013) Exact methods for variable selection in principal component analysis: guide functions and pre-selection. Comput Stat Data Anal 57:95-11 CrossRef
39. Parinet B, Lhote A, Legube B (2004) Principal component analysis: an appropriate tool for water quality evaluation and management—application to a tropical lake system. Ecol Model 178:295-11 CrossRef
40. Park YS, Chon TS, Kwak IS (2004) Hierarchical community classification and assessment of aquatic ecosystems using artificial neural networks. Sci Total Environ 327:105-22 CrossRef
41. Phillips J (2012) Using a mathematical model to assess the sustainability of proposed bauxite mining in Andhra Pradesh, India from a quantitative-based environmental impact assessment. Environ Earth Sci 67:1587-603 CrossRef
42. Song GF, Tao HP, Liu BT, Shi Z, Guo B, Hua J (2012) Spatial distribution characteristics of soil erodibility K value in the upper Yangtze River. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 21(9):1123-130 (in Chinese)
43. Sun GJ (2012) Study on the evaluation of eco-environmental vulnerability by BP artificial neural network: a case study of Wulumuqi County. J Northwest Normal Univ (Nat Sci) 48(5):105-08,114 (in Chinese)
44. Tran LT, Knight CG, Robertv O (2002) Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the mid-Atlantic region. Environ Manag 29(6):845-59 CrossRef
45. Villa F, McLeod H (2002) Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making: guidelines and applications. Environ Manag 29(3):335-48 CrossRef
46. Wang SY, Liu JS, Yang CJ (2008) Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in the Yellow River Basin, China. Pedosphere 18(2):171-82 CrossRef
47. Wang XD, Zhong XH, Gao P (2010) A GIS-based decision support system for regional eco-security assessment and its application on the Tibetan Plateau. J Environ Manag 91:1981-990 CrossRef
48. Wotling G, Bouvier CH, Danloux J (2000) Regionalization of extreme precipitation distribution using the principal components of the topographical environment. J Hydrol 233:86-01 CrossRef
49. Xu QY, Huang M, Lu PL, Li RQ (2011) Integrated assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Yangtze River Delta based on RS and GIS. Res Environ Sci 24(1):58-5 (in Chinese)
50. Yao J, Ding J, Ai NS (2003) Assessment of ecological vulnerability in upper reaches of Minjiang River. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 39(3):77-0 (in Chinese) - 作者单位：Huaiyong Shao (1) (2)
Meng Liu (1) (2)
Qiufang Shao (1)
Xiaofei Sun (1) (2)
Jinhui Wu (1) (2)
Zhiying Xiang (1) (2)
Wunian Yang (1) (2)
1. Chengdu University of Technology, 610059, Chengdu, China
2. Key Laboratory of Geoscience Spatial Information Technology, Ministry of Land and Resources of the P.R.China, 610059, Chengdu, China - ISSN：1866-6299
文摘
The Anning River Basin is located in the transitional zone of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Yunnan-Kweichow Plateau and Sichuan Basin. This transitional zone is an important ecological barrier of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and plays a significant role in the ecological security and ecological construction of Sichuan Province. However, the innate vulnerability of the eco-environment combined with the unreasonable development and use of minerals, hydropower, agriculture and animal husbandry resources contribute to prominent eco-environmental problems. In support of remote sensing and geographical information system, this study uses the spatial principal component analysis (SPCA) method to build the evaluation model for the vulnerability evaluation and analysis of the eco-environment in the Anning River Basin. The following indicators are selected for the SPCA: elevation, slope, vegetation index, land use, soil type, soil erosion, precipitation, temperature, and population density. Thereafter, the first four principal components are selected and their corresponding weights are determined. The eco-environmental vulnerability comprehensive index of the Anning River Basin is calculated by using these data. According to the calculated results, the eco-environmental vulnerability of the Anning River Basin is divided into five levels, namely, potential vulnerability, slight vulnerability, light vulnerability, moderate vulnerability, and high vulnerability. Eco-environmental changes for the past 20?years (from 1990 to 2010) are discussed and analyzed as well as the driving forces. The analysis shows that the eco-environmental vulnerability of the Anning River Basin is at the moderate level, and exhibits obvious vertical distribution characteristics. The main reasons that cause eco-environmental changes are mainly human factors, socioeconomic factors, and environmental protection policies like “Natural Forests Protection-and “Grain-for-Green- Based on the vulnerability classification results, the Anning River Basin is divided into three partitions for different degrees of eco-environmental reconstruction and protection, which provides foundation for the local eco-environmental reconstruction so as to reconstruct in order of the importance and urgency.