参考文献:1. Walters BC et al. Early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines 2000; 186-98. 2. Wijdicks EFM, Hijdra A, Young GB, Bassetti CL, Wiebe S. Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2006;67:203-0. CrossRef 3. Fugate JE, Wijdicks EFM, Mandrekar J, et al. Predictors of neurologic outcome in hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:907-4. CrossRef 4. Bushnell CD, Phillips-Bute BG, Laskowitz DT, Lynch JR, Chilukuri V, Borel CO. Survival and outcome after endotracheal intubation for acute stroke. Neurology. 1999;52:1374-1. CrossRef 5. Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:585-3. CrossRef 6. Wijdicks EFM, Varelas PN, Gronseth FS, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010;74:1911-. CrossRef 7. Clark A, Clarke TNS, Gregson B, Hooker PNA, Chambers IR. Variability in pupil size estimation. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:440-. CrossRef 8. Wilson S, Amling JK, Floyd SD, McNair ND. Determining interrater reliability of nurses-assessment of pupil size. J Neurosci Nurs. 1988;20:189-2. CrossRef 9. Van Den Berge JH, Schouten HJA, Boomstra S, Van Drunen Little S, Braakman R. Interobserver agreement in assessment of ocular signs in coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979;42:1163-. CrossRef 10. Litvan I, Saposnik G, Maurino J, Gonzalez L, Saizar R, Sica REP, Bartko JJ. Pupillary diameter assessment: need for a graded scale. Neurology. 2000;54:530. CrossRef 11. Larson MD, Muhiudeen I. Pupillometric analysis of the ‘Absent Light Reflex- Arch Neurol. 1995;52:369-2. CrossRef 12. Meeker M, Du R, Bacchetti P, Privitera CM, Larson MD, Holland MC, Manley G. Pupil examination: validity and clinical utility of an automated pupillometer. J Neurosci Nurs. 2005;37(1):34-0. CrossRef
作者单位:Christopher L. Kramer (1) Alejandro A. Rabinstein (1) Eelco F. M. Wijdicks (1) Sara E. Hocker (1)
1. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Mary Brigh 8-D, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
ISSN:1556-0961
文摘
Background A 62-year-old man with severe traumatic brain injury developed postsurgical anisocoria in which there was a discrepancy between pupillometer and manual testing. Methods Case report. Results The patient’s larger pupil was read as unreactive by the pupillometer but constricted 1?mm over 7-?s of continuous light stimulation. Conclusions While pupillometry assessment is a valuable adjunct to the manual pupillary assessment, this case demonstrates that nonreactive pupils read on the pupillometer should be confirmed with the manual examination because it can miss very slowly reacting pupils.