Use of remote response devices: an effective interactive method in the long- term learning

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Maite Millor ; Jon Etxano ; Pedro Slon ; Paula García-Barquín…
• 关键词：Premedical education ; Premedical students ; Learning ; Educational models ; Radiology
• 刊名：European Radiology
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：March 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：25
• 期：3
• 页码：894-900
• 全文大小：2,681 KB
• 参考文献：1. Nyhsen CM, Steinberg LJ, O'Connell JE (2013) Undergraduate radiology teaching from the student’s perspective. Insights Imaging 4:103-09 CrossRef
  2. European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2011) Undergraduate education in radiology. Insights Imaging 2:363-74 CrossRef
  3. Kourdioukova EV, Valcke M, Derese A, Verstraete KL (2011) Analysis of radiology education in undergraduate medical doctors training in Europe. Eur J Radiol 78:309-18 CrossRef
  4. Oris E, Verstraete K, Valcke M (2012) ESR Working Group on Undergraduate Education. Results of a survey by the European Society of Radiology (ESR): undergraduate radiology education in Europe-influences of a modern teaching approach. Insights Imaging 3:121-30 CrossRef
  5. Branstetter BF 4th, Faix LE, Humphrey AL, Schumann JB (2007) Preclinical medical student training in radiology: the effect of early exposure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:9-4 CrossRef
  6. Gunderman RB, Siddiqui AR, Heitkamp DE, Kipfer HD (2003) The vital role of radiology in the medical school curriculum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1239-242 CrossRef
  7. Holt NF (2001) Medical students need more radiology education. Acad Med 76:1 CrossRef
  8. Collins J, Dotti SL, Albanese MA (2002) Teaching radiology to medical students: an integrated approach. Acad Radiol 9:1046-053 CrossRef
  9. Branstetter BF 4th, Humphrey AL, Schumann JB (2008) The long-term impact of preclinical education on medical students-opinions about radiology. Acad Radiol 15:1331-339 CrossRef
  10. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA et al (2010) Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 376:1923-958 CrossRef
  11. Nyhsen CM, Lawson C, Higginson J (2011) Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement. Insights Imaging 2:261-66 CrossRef
  12. Maleck M, Fischer MR, Kammer B et al (2001) Do computers teach better? A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology. Radiographics 21:1025-032 CrossRef
  13. Norman GR, Brooks LR, Cunnington JP, Shali V, Marriott M, Regehr G (1996) Expert-novice differences in the use of history and visual information from patients. Acad Med 71:62-4 CrossRef
  14. Regehr G, Norman GR (1996) Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Acad Med 71:988-001 CrossRef
  15. Mennin SP, Friedman M, Skipper B, Kalishman S, Snyder J (1993) Performances on the NBME I, II, and III by medical students in the problem-based learning and conventional tracks at the University of New Mexico. Acad Med 68:616-24 CrossRef
  16. Schmidt HG, Machiels-Bongaerts M, Hermans H, Cate TJ, Venekamp R, Boshuizen HP (1996) The development of diagnostic competence: comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Acad Med 71:658-64 CrossRef
  17. Hecht S, Adams WH, Cunningham MA, Lane IF, Howell NE (2013) Stude
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Imaging and Radiology
  Diagnostic Radiology
  Interventional Radiology
  Neuroradiology
  Ultrasound
  Internal Medicine
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1432-1084

文摘

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of personal response systems (PRS) or clickers improved learning and retention of radiology concepts within a group of medical students. Materials and methods A total of 175 medical students attended 17 thoracic radiology lectures. Half of the information was taught with traditional teaching methods. The other half was performed using multiple-choice Power Point slides with PRS. Three months later, the students were tested using questions about the topics explained with and without PRS. We compared the average numbers of correct answers, wrong answers and unanswered questions between the topics explained with PRS and those without. Results The average number of correct answers was significantly higher in the interactive teaching (PRS) questions than in the passive education questions (63.6 vs. 53.2?%, p--.05). The percentages of wrong and unanswered interactive teaching questions were significantly lower than those in the passive education questions (23.4 vs. 27.4?% p--.005 and 13 vs. 19.5?% p--.005 respectively). Conclusions Interactive learning with the use of remote response devices (PRS) is an effective method in teaching radiology because it improves learning and retention of knowledge. Key Points -Education techniques have greatly evolved in recent years. -There are various methods of teaching the subject of radiology. -Different studies have demonstrated students-preferences regarding interactivity. -Personal response systems are an effective tool to encourage student participation. -Personal response systems or clickers also improve learning and retention of concepts.