Genetic diversity and structure of Pyrus accessions of Indian Himalayan region based on morphological and SSR markers

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jai C. Rana (1)
  Rakesh K. Chahota (2)
  Vikas Sharma (2)
  Maneet Rana (2)
  Nidhi Verma (3)
  Bhawna Verma (2)
  Tilak R. Sharma (2)
  
• 关键词：Pear ; Pyrus ; Simple sequence repeat (SSR) ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic structure ; Phylogenetic relationship
• 刊名：Tree Genetics & Genomes
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：February 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：11
• 期：1
• 全文大小：1,689 KB
• 参考文献：1. Akcay ME, Burak M, Kazan K, Yuksel C, Mutaf F, Bakir M, Ayanoglu H, Ergül A (2014) Genetic analysis of Anatolian pear germplasm by simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Ann Appl Biol 164:441-52 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aab.12113" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  2. Asanidze Z, Akhalkatsia M, Gvritishvili M (2011) Comparative morphometric study and relationships between the Caucasian species of wild pear ( / Pyrus spp.) and local cultivars in Georgia. Flora-Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants 206:974-86 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2011.04.010" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  3. Bailey LH (1953) Standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Mac Milan Co., New York
  4. Bao L, Chen K, Zhang D, Cao Y, Yamamoto T, Teng Y (2007) Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus L.) cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:959-71 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9152-y" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  5. Bao L, Chen K, Zhang D, Li X, Teng Y (2008) An assessment of genetic variability and relationships within Asian pears based on AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers. Sci Hortic 116:374-80 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.02.008" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  6. Baraket G, Chatti K, Saddoud O, Abdelkarim AB, Mars M, Trifi M, Hannachi AS (2011) Comparative assessment of SSR and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of Fig, / Ficus carica L., genetic resources in Tunisia. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29:171-84 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0217-x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  7. Belaj A, Munoz-Diez C, Baldoni L, Proceddu A, Barranco D, Satovic Z (2007) Genetic diversity and population structure of wild olives from the north-western Mediterranean assessed by SSR markers. Ann Bot 20:1-0
  8. Bhat ZA, Dhillon WS, Singh K (2013) Genetic diversity studies on some pear genotypes using simple sequence repeats (SSRs) derived from apple and pear. Indian J Hort 70:1-
  9. Botstein D, White KL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314-31
  10. Cao Y, Luming T, Yuan G, Fengzhi L (2012) Genetic diversity of cultivated and wild Ussurian Pear ( / Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim.) in China evaluated with M13-tailed SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:9-7 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9661-1" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  11. Dolatowski J, Nowosielski J, Podyma W, Szymanska M, Zych M (2004) Molecular studies on the variability of Polish semi-wild pears ( / Pyrus) using AFLP. J Fruit Orna Plant Res 12:331-7
  12. Dhillon BS, Rana JC (2004) Temperate fruits genetic resources management in India—issues and strategies. Acta Hort 662:139-46
  13. Dhillon BS, Dhillon WS (2008) Evaluation of hard pears germplasm for fruit bearing and quality attributes. Indian J Hort 65:389-92
  14. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus 12:13-5
  15. Earl DA, von Holdt BM (2011) Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359-61 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  16. Erfani J, Ebadi A, Abdollahi H, Fatahi R (2012) Genetic diversity of some pear cultivars and genotypes using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:1065-072 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11105-012-0421-y" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  17. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611-620 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  18. FAOSTAT (2012) Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations, class="a-plus-plus">http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx
  19. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes 7:574-78 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  20. Fowler C, Mooney P (1990) The threatened gene-food, politics and the loss of genetic diversity. University of Arizona Press,
• 作者单位：Jai C. Rana (1)
  Rakesh K. Chahota (2)
  Vikas Sharma (2)
  Maneet Rana (2)
  Nidhi Verma (3)
  Bhawna Verma (2)
  Tilak R. Sharma (2)
  
  1. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Regional Station, Phagli Shimla, 171004, India
  2. Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, 176062, India
  3. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa campus, New Delhi, 110012, India
  
• ISSN：1614-2950

文摘

Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among 48 pear accessions belonging to six species were determined using 23 morphological traits and 20 simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. To assess the genetic diversity, data on morphological (both quantitative and qualitative) traits were recorded during 2010-012 using standard pear descriptors. It was observed that the traits ratio of fruit length to diameter, persistency of calyx on mature fruits and fruit surface and pulp texture were important in detecting variation across pear species. At molecular level, 20 SSR primers amplified 190 polymorphic alleles with an average of 9.5 alleles per primer. Size of amplified alleles ranged from 85 to 450?bp. Mean polymorphic information content (PIC) was 0.80 showing high level of SSR polymorphism. Bayesian model-based STRUCTURE analysis assigned genotypes into five clusters and also showed the extent of admixture within individuals. Genotypes belonging to Pyrus pyrifolia were clustered into two different clusters indicating broad genetic base for this species while Pyrus communis genotypes appeared to have conserved genetic makeup. Dendrogram-based on Jaccard’s similarity coefficient and neighbor-joining tree showed two major groups of Asiatic (P. pyrifolia, Pyrus pashia, Pyrus serotina and Pyrus jacquemontiana) and European (P. communis) pears. However, accessions belonging to P. pyrifolia were further divided into subgroups. Cluster analysis based on morphological traits was in agreement with the dendrogram and structure clusters obtained with SSR data. The Mantel matrix correspondence test was used to further compare the molecular and morphological similarity matrices and positive correlation coefficient (r--.164; P--.001) was observed. Results of this study present important information about genetic structure of Indian pear accessions which can contribute significantly to future breeding and improvement programmes in this species.