A Reply to Groves

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Daniele Ruggiu
• 关键词：Human rights ; Ethics of care ; Governance ; Regionalism ; Future
• 刊名：NanoEthics
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：April 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：10
• 期：1
• 页码：111-116
• 全文大小：259 KB
• 参考文献：1.Ruggiu D (2013) Temporal perspectives of the nanotechnological challenge to regulation. How human rights can contribute to the present and future of nanotechnologies. Nanoethics 7(3):201–215CrossRef
  2.Groves C (2015) Logic of choice and logic of care? Uncertainty, technological mediation and responsible innovation. Nanoethics 9(3):321–333CrossRef
  3.Ruggiu D (2015a) Anchoring European governance: two versions of responsible research and innovation and EU fundamental rights as ‘normative anchor points’. Nanoethics 9(3):217–235CrossRef
  4.Greer S (2000) The margin of appreciation: interpretation and discretion under the european convention on human rights. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg
  5.Viola F, Zaccaria G (2001) Diritto e interpretazione. Lineamenti di teoria ermeneutica del diritto. Laterza, Roma- Bari
  6.Tronto J (1993) Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethics of care. Routledge, London
  7.European Parliament (2009) Parliament resolution of 24/04/2009 on Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials (2008/2208(INI)).European Parliament, Brusselshttp://​www.​europarl.​europa.​eu/​sides/​getDoc.​do?​pubRef=​−/​/​EP/​/​NONSGML+TA+P6-TA-2009-0328+0+DOC+PDF+V​0/​/​EN . Accessed on 23 February 2015.
  8.Cosmetics Europe (2011) Colipa Guidelines on Cosmetic Products. Compliance with Regulation 1222/2009 on Cosmetics products https://​www.​cosmeticseurope.​eu/​publications-cosmetics-europe-association/​guidelines.​html?​view=​item&​id=​84
  9.Ruggiu D (2015b) The consolidation process of the EU regulatory framework on nanotechnologies: within and beyond the EU case-by-case approach. Eur J Law Technol 6(3):1–35
  10.Mackie JL (1978) Can there be a right-based moral theory. Midwest Stud Philos 3:350–359CrossRef
  11.Viola F (2000) Etica e metaetica dei diritti umani. Giappichelli, Torino
  12.Utting P (2002) Regulating business via multistakeholder initiatives: a preliminary assessment. In: Jenkins RA, Utting P, Pino RA (eds) Voluntary approaches to corporate responsibility: readings and a resource guide. UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service (NGLS) and UNRISD, Geneva, pp 61–130
  13.Raz J (2007) Human rights without foundations (March 2007). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14/2007. Available at SSRN: http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​999874 or http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​2139/​ssrn.​999874
  14.von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R, Heintz M, Bessant J (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley, London, pp 51–74CrossRef
  15.Rawls J (2001) The law of people. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1999) [Italian translation: Il diritto dei popoli. Edizioni di Comunità, Torino]
  16.Cassese A (1988) I diritti nel mondo contemporaneo. Laterza, Roma-Bari
  17.Waldron J (1996) Rights and needs: the myth of disjuncture. In: Sarat A, Kearnes TR (eds) Legal rights: historical and philosophical perspectives. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 87–109
  18.White J, Tronto J (2004) Political practices of care: needs and rights. Ratio Juris 17(4):425–453CrossRef
  19.Flament G (2013) NIA briefing note: nanotechnology and the Council of Europe. Nanotechnology Industrial Association, Brussels
  20.Noddings N (1984) Caring: a feminist approach to ethics. University of California Press, Berkeley
  21.Smismans S (2008) New modes of governance and the participatory myth. West Eur Politics 31(5):874–895CrossRef
  22.Smismans S (2015) Democratic participation and the search for a European Union institutional architecture that accommodates interests and expertise. In: Piattoni S (ed) The European Union democratic principles and institutional architectures in times of crisis. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 88–111CrossRef
  23.Dworkin R. (1989) The law empire. The Belkamp Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) (1986) [Italian translation: L’impero del diritto. Il Saggiatore, Milano]
  
• 作者单位：Daniele Ruggiu (1)
  
  1. Centre for Environmental, Ethical, Legal and Social Decisions on Emerging Technologies (CIGA), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  
• 刊物主题：Ethics; Nanotechnology; Philosophy of Science; Philosophy of Technology;
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1871-4765

文摘

In this article, I respond to the criticisms of my ideas made by Christopher Groves in his piece “Logic of Choice or Logic of Care? Uncertainty, Technological Mediation and Responsible Innovation”, which was published in this journal. In my refutation of his objections, I firstly argue that, thanks to the work of the European Court of Human Rights, human rights are continuously evolving in Europe and therefore constitute a framework that is open to the future. Secondly, I argue that, through codes of conduct, guidelines, etc., human rights give rise to moral practices, for example in the business sphere, and that they are not abstract and universal like natural rights, but contextual and actuated at the world-regional level, in particular. Finally, I show that a human rights framework is more effective than an ethics of care when it comes to dealing with certain aspects of intergenerational relationships, such as genetic enhancement in humans.