Research needs and challenges faced in supporting scenario design in sustainability science: a literature review
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Yusuke Kishita ; Keishiro Hara ; Michinori Uwasu ; Yasushi Umeda
  • 关键词:Scenario design ; Stakeholder participation ; Design support ; Literature review ; Research agenda ; Knowledge structuring
  • 刊名:Sustainability Science
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:March 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:11
  • 期:2
  • 页码:331-347
  • 全文大小:922 KB
  • 参考文献:Alcamo J (2001) Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessments. In: Ribeiro T (ed) Environmental issue report no. 24. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen
    Alcamo J, Kreileman GJJ, Bollen JC, van den Born GJ, Gerlagh R, Krol MS, Toet AMC, de Vries HJM (1996) Baseline scenarios of global environmental change. Global Environ Chang 6:261–304CrossRef
    Alcamo J, Kok K, Busch G, Priess JA, Eickhout B, Rounsevell M, Rothman DS, Heistermann M (2006) Searching for the future of land: scenarios from the local to global scale. In: Lanbin EF, Gerist H (eds) Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. Springer, Berlin, pp 137–155CrossRef
    Anderson KL, Mander SL, Bows A, Shackley S, Agnolucci P, Ekins P (2008) The Tyndall decarbonisation scenarios: part II: scenarios for a 60% CO2 reduction in the UK. Energ Policy 36:3764–3773CrossRef
    Banister D, Dreborg KH, Hedberg L, Hunhammar S, Steen P, Åkerman J (2000) Transport policy scenarios for the EU in 2020: images of the future. Innov Eur J Soc Sci 13:27–45CrossRef
    Banuls VA, Turoff M (2011) Scenario construction via Delphi and cross-impact analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:1579–1602CrossRef
    Berkhout F, Hertin J, Jordan A (2002) Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’. Global Environ Chang 12:83–95CrossRef
    Bishop P, Hines A, Collins T (2007) The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight 9:5–25CrossRef
    Börjeson L, Höjer M, Dreborg K, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2006) Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide. Futures 38:723–739CrossRef
    Bradfield R, Wright G, Burt G, Cairns G, van der Heijden K (2005) The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures 37:795–812CrossRef
    Brewer GD (2007) Inventing the future: scenarios, imagination, mastery and control. Sust Sci 2:159–177CrossRef
    Browne AL, Leviston Z, Greenhill MP, Nancarrow BE, Tucker DI, Porter NB (2007) Structuring dimensions of risk: technical and community perceptions of risk in the reuse of wastewater for irrigation and indirect potable supply. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Wembley
    Carlsson-Kanyama A, Dreborg KH, Moll HC, Padovan D (2008) Participative Backcasting: a Tool for Involving Stakeholders in Local Sustainability Planning. Futures 40:34–46CrossRef
    Carpenter S, Pingali P, Bennett E, Zurek M (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios—findings of the scenarios working group. Millennium ecosystem assessment series vol. 2. Island Press, Washington DC
    Chermack TJ (2011) Scenario planning in organizations: how to create, use, and assess scenarios. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco
    Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8059–8061CrossRef
    Clark WC, Munn RE (1986) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, New York
    Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture (CA) (2007) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London
    Cosgrove WJ, Rijsberman F (2000) World water vision: making water everybody’s business. Earthscan/Thanet Press, London
    Coyle RG (2003) Morphological Forecasting: Field Anomaly Relaxation (FAR). In: Futures Research Methodology-V2.0, AC/UNU Millennium Project, Washington DC
    Dalkey N, Helmer O (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci 9:458–467CrossRef
    DeWeerd HA (1967) Political military scenarios. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, P-3535
    Dortmans PJ (2005) Forecasting, backcasting, migration landscapes and strategic planning maps. Futures 37:273–285CrossRef
    Dreborg KH (1996) Essence of backcasting. Futures 28:813–828CrossRef
    Eames M, Egmose J (2011) Community foresight for urban sustainability: insights from the citizens science for sustainability (SuScit) project. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:769–784CrossRef
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2006) World agriculture: towards 2030/2050 Interim report. FAO, Rome
    Foresight (2013) The future of manufacturing: a new era of opportunity and challenge for the UK project report. The Government Office for Science, London
    Foresight Horizon Scanning Centre (2009) Scenario planning: guidance note. The Government Office for Science, London
    Fujimoto J (ed) (2007) Lifestyles toward low carbon society 2050: ecodesign of ICT society. Dentsu, Tokyo (in Japanese)
    Gallopin G, Hammond A, Raskin P, Swart R (1997) Branch points: global scenarios and human choice. In: Polestar series report no. 7, Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Boston
    Gaziulusoy Aİ, Boyle C, McDowall R (2013) System innovation for sustainability: a systemic double-flow scenario method for companies. J Clean Prod 45:104–116CrossRef
    Geyer A, Scapolo F, Boden M, Döry T, Ducatel K (2003) The future of manufacturing in Europe 2015–2020: the challenge for sustainability. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Brussels
    Giurco D, Cohen B, Langham E, Warnken M (2011) Backcasting energy futures using industrial ecology. Technol Forecast Soc 78:797–818CrossRef
    Glenn JC (2003) Participatory methods. In: Glenn JC, Gordon TJ (eds) Futures research methodology-V2.0. AC/UNU Millennium Project, Washington DC
    Glenn JC and the Futures Group International (2003) Scenarios. In: Glenn JC, Gordon TJ (eds) Futures research methodology-V2.0. AC/UNU Millennium Project, Washington DC
    Gordon TJ (2003a) Trend impact analysis. In: Glenn JC, Gordon TJ (eds) Futures research methodology-V2.0. AC/UNU Millennium Project, Washington DC
    Gordon TJ (2003b) Cross impact analysis. In: Glenn JC, Gordon TJ (eds) Futures research methodology-V2.0. AC/UNU Millennium Project, Washington DC
    Hashimoto S, Osako M, Abe N, Inaba R, Tasaki T, Nansai K, Fujii M, Matsuhashi K, Moriguchi Y (2009) Scenario planning on resource/waste flows and resource recycling/waste management system in the near future. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng (G) 65:44–56 (in Japanese)
    Healey NM (1994) The transition economies of central and eastern Europe: a political, economic, social and technological analysis. Columbia J World Bus 29:62–70CrossRef
    Hjorth P, Bagheri A (2006) Navigating towards sustainable development: a system dynamics approach. Futures 38:74–92CrossRef
    Höjer M, Mattsson LG (2000) Determinism and backcasting in future studies. Futures 32:613–634CrossRef
    Holmberg J, Robèrt KH (2000) Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles—a framework for strategic planning. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 7:291–308CrossRef
    Huss WR (1988) A move toward scenario analysis. Int J Forecast 4:377–388CrossRef
    Inayatullah S (1998) Causal layered analysis. Futures 30:815–829CrossRef
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2009) World energy outlook 2009. IEA Publications, Paris
    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2010) Energy technology perspectives 2010. IEA Publications, Paris
    Jäger J, Rothman D, Anastasi C, Kartha S, van Notten P (2007) Scenario development and analysis. In: Pintér L, Swanson D, Chenje J (eds) GEO resource book: a training manual on integrated environmental assessment and reporting. UNEP and IISD, Winnipeg
    Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sust Sci 6:69–82CrossRef
    Jetter A, Schweinfort W (2011) Building scenarios with fuzzy cognitive maps: an exploratory study of solar energy. Futures 43:52–66CrossRef
    Kahn H, Wiener AJ (1967) The year 2000. Beckmans, Stockholm
    Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19449–19450CrossRef
    Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jäger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642CrossRef
    Kawakita J (1974) The Hill Magars and their neighbors: hill peoples surrounding the Ganges plain. Tokai University Press, Tokyo
    Kirsch K (2004) A review of scenario planning literature. GRIN, Norderstedt
    Kishita Y, Hara K, Uwasu M, Umeda Y (2011) Integrated scenario design for sustainability research—concept, framework and challenges. In: Matsumoto M, Umeda Y, Masui K, Fukushige S (eds) Design for innovative value towards a sustainable society. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 582–587
    Kok K, van Vliet M, Bärlund I, Dubel A, Sendzimir J (2011) Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: experiences from the SCENES project. Technol Forecast Soc 78:835–851CrossRef
    Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sust Sci 1:1–6CrossRef
    Landeta J (2006) Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73:467–482CrossRef
    Lederwasch A, Mason L, Daly J, Prior T, Giurco D (2011) A vision for mining and minerals: applying causal layered analysis and art. J Futures Stud 15:203–224
    Leney T, Coles M, Grollman P, Vilu R (2004) Scenarios toolkit. Cedefop Dossier Series 8. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    Liimatainen H, Kallionpää E, Pöllänen M, Stenholm P, Tapio P, McKinnon A (2014) Decarbonizing road freight in the Future—detailed scenarios of the carbon emissions of finnish road freight transport in 2030 using a Delphi method approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 81:177–191CrossRef
    Mander SL, Bows A, Anderson KL, Shackley S, Agnolucci P, Ekins P (2008) The Tyndall decarbonisation scenarios: part I: development of a backcasting methodology with stakeholder participation. Energ Policy 36:3754–3763CrossRef
    Martelli A (2001) Scenario building and scenario planning: state of the art and prospects of evolution. Futures Res Q 17:57–74
    Mason D (2003) Tailoring scenario planning to the company culture. Strategy Leadersh 31:25–28CrossRef
    Mattila T, Antikainen R (2011) Backcasting sustainable freight transport systems for Europe in 2050. Energy Policy 39:1241–1248CrossRef
    McKee A, Guimaraes MH, Pinto-Correia T (2015) Social capital accumulation and the role of the researcher: an example of a transdisciplinary visioning process for the future of agriculture in Europe. Environ Sci Policy 50:88–99CrossRef
    Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows D (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York
    Milestad R, Svenfelt A, Dreborg KH (2014) Developing integrated explorative and normative scenarios: the case of future land use in a climate-neutral Sweden. Futures 60:59–71CrossRef
    Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solution-based research agenda. Sust Sci 9:239–246CrossRef
    Millett SM (1988) How scenarios trigger strategic thinking. Long Range Plann 21:61–68CrossRef
    Mizuno Y, Kishita Y, Wada H, Kobayashi K, Fukushige S, Umeda Y (2012) Proposal of design support method of sustainability scenarios in backcasting manner. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference (IDETC/CIE 2012): 17th design for manufacturing and the life cycle conference (DFMLC), DETC2012-70850
    Mizuno Y, Kishita Y, Matsuhashi K, Miyake G, Murayama M, Umeda Y, Harasawa H (2013) An approach to designing sustainability scenarios part 1: a design method for backcasting scenarios. In: Proceedings of EcoDesign 2013: the 8th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing, O-I-9
    Mizuno Y, Kishita Y, Fukushige S, Umeda Y (2014) Envisioning sustainable manufacturing industries of Japan. Int J Autom Technol 8:634–643
    Nishioka S (ed) (2008) Japan low carbon society scenario. Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Tokyo (in Japanese)
    Nowack M, Endrikat J, Guenther E (2011) Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: quality and design considerations. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:1603–1615CrossRef
    O’Brien FA (2004) Scenario planning: lessons for practice from teaching and learning. Eur J Oper Res 152:709–722CrossRef
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008) OECD environmental outlook to 2050: the consequences of inaction. OECD, Paris
    Parson EA, Fisher-Vanden K (1995) Integrated assessment models of global climate change. Annu Rev Energy Env 22:589–628CrossRef
    Patel M, Kok K, Rothman DS (2007) Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 24:546–561CrossRef
    Quist J (2007) Backcasting for a sustainable future: the impact after 10 years. Eburon Academic Publishers, Delft
    Quist J, Vergragt P (2006) Past and future of backcasting: the shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38:1027–1045CrossRef
    Raskin P, Banuri T, Gallopin G, Gutman P, Hammond A, Kates R, Swart R (2002) Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Stockholm Environment Institute, Boston
    Raskin P, Monks F, Ribeiro T, van Vuuren D, Zurek M (2005) Global scenarios in historical perspective. In: Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
    Rauschmayer F, Wittmer H (2006) Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts. Land Use Policy 23:108–122CrossRef
    Robèrt KH, Schmidt-Bleek B, Aloisi de Larderel J, Basile G, Jansen JL, Kuehr R, Price Thomas P, Suzuki M, Hawken P, Wackernagel M (2002) Strategic sustainable development: selection, design and synergies of applied tools. J Clean Prod 10:197–214CrossRef
    Robinson J (1982) Energy backcasting: a proposed method of policy analysis. Energy Policy 10:337–344CrossRef
    Robinson J (1990) Futures under glass: a recipe for people who hate to predict. Futures 22:820–842CrossRef
    Robinson J (2003) Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 35:839–856CrossRef
    Robinson J, Burch S, Talwar S, O’Shea M, Walsh M (2012) Envisioning sustainability: recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technol Forecast Soc 78:756–768CrossRef
    Rotmans J, van Asselt MBA, Anastassi C, Greeuw S, Mellors J, Peters S, Rothman DS, Riijens-Klomp N (2000) Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures 32:809–831CrossRef
    Schneider F, Rist S (2014) Envisioning sustainable water futures in a transdisciplinary learning process: combining normative, explorative, and participatory scenario approaches. Sust Sci 9:463–481CrossRef
    Schwartz P (1991) The art of the long view. Doubleday, New York
    Shell International (2008) Scenarios: an explorer’s guide. http://​www.​shell.​com/​global/​future-energy/​scenarios/​explorers-guide.​html . Accessed 25 Sept 2015
    Shiroyama H, Yarime M, Matsuo M, Schroeder H, Scholz R, Ulrich AE (2012) Governance for sustainability: knowledge integration and multi-actor dimensions in risk management. Sust Sci 7:45–55CrossRef
    Spangenberg JH (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis, and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38:1–13CrossRef
    Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics. McGraw-Hill, Boston
    Stigliani WM, Brouwer FM, Munn RE, Show RW, Antonowsky M (1989) Future environments for Europe: some implications of alternative development paths. Sci Total Environ 80:1–102CrossRef
    Svenfelt A, Engström R, Örjan S (2011) Decreasing energy use in buildings by 50 % by 2050—a backcasting study using stakeholder groups. Technol Forecast Soc 78:785–796CrossRef
    Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environ Change 14:137–146CrossRef
    Ten Brink B, van der Esch S, Kram T, van Oorschot M, Alkemade JRM, Ahrens R, Bakkenes M, Bakkes JA, van den Berg M, Christensen V, Janse J, Jeuken M, Lucas P, Manders T, van Meijl H., Stehfest E., Tabeau A., van Vuuren D., Wilting H. (2010) Rethinking global biodiversity strategies: exploring structural changes in production and consumption to reduce biodiversity loss. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Bilthoven
    Tress B, Tress G (2003) Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning: a study from Denmark. Landsc Urban Plan 64:161–178CrossRef
    Tuominen A, Tapio P, Varho V, Järvi T, Banister D (2014) Pluralistic backcasting: integrating multiple visions with policy packages for transport climate policy. Futures 60:41–58CrossRef
    Umeda Y, Nishiyama T, Yamasaki Y, Kishita Y, Fukushige S (2009) Proposal of sustainable society scenario simulator. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 1:272–278CrossRef
    Umeda Y, Kishita Y, Morioka T (2011) Framework of future vision, scenario and roadmap. In: Morioka T, Hanaki H, Moriguchi Y (eds) Establishing a resource-circulating society in Asia: challenges and opportunities. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 22–36
    United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002) Global environment outlook 3. Earthscan, London
    United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2012) Scenarios and sustainability transformation. Global environment outlook (GEO) 5. Progress Press Ltd., Valletta, pp 419–456
    van der Heijden K (1996) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Wiley, Chichester
    van Leeuwen E, Nijkamp P, Akguen AA, Gheasi M (2013) Foresights, scenarios, and sustainable development: a pluriformity perspective. In: Giaoutzi M, Sapio B (eds) Recent developments in foresight methodologies. Springer, New York, pp 237–252CrossRef
    van Notten P (2005) Writing on the wall: scenario development in times of discontinuity. Dissertation.com, Boca Raton
    van Notten P, Rotmans J, van Asselt M, Rothman D (2003) An updated scenario typology. Futures 35:423–443CrossRef
    van Vliet M, Kok K (2015) Combining backcasting and exploratory scenarios to develop robust water strategies in face of uncertain futures. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 20:43–74CrossRef
    van Vuuren DP, Kok MTJ, Girod B, Lucas PL, de Vries B (2012) Scenarios in global environmental assessments: key characteristics and lessons for future use. Glob Environ Change 22:884–895CrossRef
    Vergragt PJ, Quist J (2011) Backcasting for sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78:747–755CrossRef
    Wack P (1985a) Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Bus Rev 63:73–89
    Wack P (1985b) Scenarios: shooting the rapids. Harvard Bus Rev 63:139–150
    Wada H, Kishita Y, Mizuno Y, Hirosaki M, Fukushige S, Umeda Y (2011) Proposal of a design support method for sustainability scenarios—1st report: designing forecasting scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 18th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering 2011, pp 189–194
    Ward E, Schriefer AE (2003) Dynamic scenarios: system thinking meets scenario planning. In: Fahey L, Randall RM (eds) Learning from the future. Wiley, New York, pp 140–156
    Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2014) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sust Sci 9:497–512CrossRef
    Wiek A, Withycombe A, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sust Sci 6:203–218CrossRef
    Wilkinson L (1995) How to build scenarios. In: Wired scenarios: the future of the future. Wired: special edition. Wired Ventures, San Francisco, pp 77–81
    World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (1997) Exploring sustainable development: WBCSD global scenarios 2000–2050 summary brochure. WBCSD, London
    World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
    Wright G, Cairns G, Goodwin P (2009) Teaching scenario planning: lessons from practice in academe and business. Eur J Oper Res 194:323–335CrossRef
    Yoshikawa H (2008) Synthesiology as sustainability science. Sust Sci 3:169–170CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Yusuke Kishita (1)
    Keishiro Hara (1)
    Michinori Uwasu (1)
    Yasushi Umeda (2)

    1. Center for Environmental Innovation Design for Sustainability (CEIDS), Osaka University, 2-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
    2. Department of Precision Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
  • 刊物类别:Earth and Environmental Science
  • 刊物主题:Environment
    Environmental Management
    Climate Change
    Environmental Economics
    Landscape Ecology
    Public Health
  • 出版者:Springer Japan
  • ISSN:1862-4057
文摘
A number of scenarios have been created to explore possible images of and transitions to a sustainable society, as famously represented by the IPCC’s greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. These can be valuable as underlying information for policy makers making plans for a low-carbon society. Although many researchers have developed individual methods that can be used for designing scenarios, research agendas or challenges for supporting scenario design activities have not been sufficiently discussed. Based on an intensive literature review of existing studies, this paper aims to clarify requisites and challenges for supporting scenario design, particularly in the context of sustainability science. Given that the value of designing scenarios is to help generate and communicate various ideas about the future as argued by sustainability science literature, scenarios are often created with stakeholder participation, through iterative cycles that are composed of three steps: (a) idea generation, (b) idea integration and scenario description, and (c) scenario evaluation. The results of our literature review also show that, though a wide array of methods and tools are available to support some of the steps, there are research issues to be further addressed in supporting scenario design. They include (1) accumulating existing scenarios and simulators as a promising approach to structuring knowledge about sustainability science and (2) ensuring the transparency of the logic underlying scenarios to facilitate communication between participants. Addressing these points will enhance support for sustainability scenario design.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700