Pancreatic Resection Results in a Statewide Surgical Collaborative

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Mark A. Healy MD ; Robert W. Krell MD ; Zaid M. Abdelsattar MD…
• 刊名：Annals of Surgical Oncology
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：August 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：22
• 期：8
• 页码：2468-2474
• 全文大小：478 KB
• 参考文献：1.Evans DB, Tsai S. Volume-outcome in cancer surgery: why has the data not affected policy change? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4056-8.PubMed View Article
  2.Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995;221:43-.PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  3.Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:638-5.PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  4.Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med. 1996;165:294-00.PubMed Central PubMed
  5.Janes RH, Neiderhuber JE, Chmiel JS, Winchester DP, Ocwieja KC, Karnell LH, Clive RE, Menck HR. National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1996;223:261-2.PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  6.Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747-1.PubMed View Article
  7.Simunovic M, To T, Theriault M, Langer B. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system. CMAJ. 1999;160:643-.PubMed Central PubMed
  8.Kotwall CA, Maxwell JG, Brinker CC, Koch GG, Covington DL. National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:847-4.PubMed View Article
  9.Killeen SD, O’Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg. 2005;92:389-02.PubMed View Article
  10.Blue Cross Blue Shield Blue Distinction criteria for complex and rare cancers. http://?www.?bcbs.?com/?why-bcbs/?blue-distinction/?blue-distinction-complex-and-rare/?CRC_?MidLevel-Criteria_-01309.?pdf . Accessed 9 Oct 2014.
  11.The Leapfrog Group. http://?www.?leapfroggroup.?org/-/span> . Accessed 9 Oct 2014.
  12.Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128-7.PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  13.Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2013;236:583-2.
  14.LaPar DJ, Kron IL, Jones DR, Stukenborg GJ, Kozower BD. Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality. Ann Surg. 2012;256:606-5.PubMed View Article
  15.Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Nicholas L, Birkmeyer JD. Identifying high-quality bariatric surgery centers: hospital volume or risk-adjusted outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:702-.PubMed View Article
  16.Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ko CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250:363-6.PubMed
  17.Campbell DA, Englesbe MJ, Kubus JJ, Phillips LRS, Shanley CJ, Velanovich V, Lloyd L, Hutton MC, Arneson WA, Share DA. Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement. Arch Surg. 2010;145:985-1.PubMed View Article
  18.Parmar AD, Sheffield KM, Vargas GM, et al. Factors associated with delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB Oxford. 2013;15:763-2.PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  19.Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg. 2002;137:20-.PubMed View Article
  20.Fung-Kee-Fung M, Watters J, Crossley C, et al. Regional collaborations as a tool for quality improvements in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2009;249:565-2.PubMed View Article
  21.Share DA, Campbell DA, Birkmeyer N, Prager RL, Gurm HS, Moscucci M, Udow-Phillips M, Birkmeyer JD. How a regional collaborative of hospitals and physicians in Michigan cut costs and improved the quality of care. Health Aff Millwood. 2011;30:636-5.PubMed View Article
  22.Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1368-5.PubMed View Article
  23.American Hospital Association. AHA Annual Survey database, 1992-014. American Hospital Association, Chicago, IL.
  24.Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, Hawasli A, English WJ, Genaw J, Finks JF, Carlin AM, Birkmeyer JD; Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 28 2010;304:435-2.View Article
  25.Krell RW, Finks JF, English WJ, Dimick JB. Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable? J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:725-4; e723.
  26.Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Birkmeyer JD. Ranking hospitals on surgical mortality: the importance of reliability adjustment. Health Serv Res. 2010
• 作者单位：Mark A. Healy MD (1)
  Robert W. Krell MD (1)
  Zaid M. Abdelsattar MD (1)
  Laurence E. McCahill MD (2)
  David Kwon MD (3)
  Timothy L. Frankel MD (1)
  Samantha Hendren MD, MPH (1)
  Darrell A. Campbell Jr. MD (1)
  Sandra L. Wong MD, MS (1)
  
  1. Department of Surgery, Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  2. Department of Surgery, Metro Health Hospital, Wyoming, MI, USA
  3. Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
  
• 刊物主题：Surgical Oncology; Oncology; Surgery;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1534-4681

文摘

Background A strong relationship between hospital caseload and adverse outcomes has been demonstrated for pancreatic resections. Participation in regional surgical collaboratives may mitigate this phenomenon. This study sought to investigate changes over time in adverse outcomes after pancreatectomy across hospitals with different caseloads in a statewide surgical collaborative. Methods The study investigated patients undergoing pancreatic resection from January 2008 to August 2013 at Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) hospitals (1007 patients in 19 academic and community hospitals). Risk-adjusted rates of major complications, mortality, and failure to rescue were compared between hospitals based on caseloads (low, medium, and high) in early (2008-010) and later (2011-013) periods. Finally, the degree to which different complications explained changes in hospital outcome variation was assessed. Results Adjusted rates of major complications and mortality decreased over time, driven largely by improvements at low-caseload hospitals. In 2008-010, risk-adjusted major complication rates were higher for low-caseload than for high-caseload hospitals (27.8 vs. 17.8?%; p?=?0.02). However, these differences were attenuated in 2011-013 (22.2 vs. 20.0?%; p?=?0.74). Similarly, adjusted mortality rates were higher in low-caseload hospitals in 2008-010 (6.2 vs. 0.8?%; p?=?0.02), but these differences were attenuated in 2011-013 (3.3 vs. 1.1?%; p?=?0.18). Variation in major complications decreased, largely due to decreased variation in “medical-complication rates, with less change in surgical-site complications. Conclusion Participation in regional quality collaboratives by lower-volume hospitals can attenuate the volume–outcome relationship for pancreatic surgery. Continued work in collaboratives with an emphasis on technical and intraoperative aspects of care may improve overall quality of care.