参考文献:Aarons, G. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61-4.View Article PubMed Central PubMed Aarons, G., Cafri, G., Lugo, L., & Sawitzky, A. (2012). Expanding the domains of attitudes towards evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale-50. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39(5), 331-40.View Article PubMed Central PubMed Aarons, G., McDonald, E., Sheehan, A., & Walrath-Greene, C. (2007). Confirmatory factor analysis of the evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS) in a geographically diverse sample of community mental health providers. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 34, 465-69.View Article PubMed Aarons, G., & Sommerfeld, D. (2012). Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(4), 423-31.View Article PubMed Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2010). Training therapists in evidence-based practice: A critical review of studies from a systems-contextual perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(1), 1-0. Berkel, C., Mauricio, A., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23-3.View Article PubMed Breitkreuz, R., McConnell, D., Savage, A., & Hamilton, A. (2011). Integrating triple P into existing family support services: A case study on program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 411-22.View Article PubMed Embry, D. D., & Biglan, A. (2008). Evidence-based kernels: Fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(1), 75-13.View Article PubMed Central PubMed Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. National Implementation Research Network. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-29.View Article PubMed Central PubMed Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatments and delivery of psychological services: Shifting our emphases to increase impact. Psychological Services, 5(3), 201-15.View Article Mazzuchelli, T., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(3), 238-52. Moore, J. E., Bumbarger, B. K., & Cooper, B. R. (2013). Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. Journal of Primary Prevention, 34, 147-61. doi:10.-007/?s10935-013-0303-6 .View Article PubMed Morawska, A., Haslam, D., Milne, D., & Sanders, M. R. (2011). Evaluation of a brief parenting discussion group for parents of young children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(2), 136-45.View Article PubMed Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2009). Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The US triple P system population trial. Prevention Science, 10(1), 1-2. doi:10.-007/?S11121-009-0123-3 .View Article PubMed Central PubMed Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 38, 65-6.View Article PubMed Central PubMed Roach, A., Kratochwill, T., & Frank, J. (2009). School-based consultants as change facilitators: Adaptation of the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM) to support the implementation of research-based practices. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19, 300-20.View Article Sanders, M. R. (2012). Development, evaluation, and multinational dissemination of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 345-79.View Article PubMed Sanders, M. R., & Kirby, J. N. (2012). Consumer engagement and the development, evaluation, and dissemination of evidence-based parenting programs. Behavior Therapy, 43(2), 236-50.View Article PubMed Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2013). Towards a public health approach to parenting support: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Manuscript under review. Sanders, M. R., & Murphy-Brennan, M. (2010). Creating conditions for success beyond the professional training environment. Clincal Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(1), 31-5. Sanders, M. R., Prinz, R. J., & Sh
作者单位:Cheri J. Shapiro (1) Ronald J. Prinz (2) Matthew R. Sanders (3)
1. Institute for Families in Society, University of South Carolina, 1600 Hampton St., Fifth Floor, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA 2. Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA 3. Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
刊物类别:Behavioral Science
刊物主题:Psychology Child and School Psychology Social Sciences Sociology
出版者:Springer Netherlands
ISSN:1573-2843
文摘
Adopting a systems-contextual perspective on implementation of evidence-based parenting programs highlights the wide variety of factors that influence program use in real-world settings. These factors are often identified through quantitative survey methods of facilitators and barriers to program use. What is more difficult to capture is the history of how program use unfolds over time and what variables influence the course of implementation in natural settings. In order to capture this perspective, a qualitative study was conducted with 69 community-based service providers who had been trained previously in an evidence-based parenting intervention (Triple P-Positive Parenting Program) but who were not receiving external implementation support outside of access to program materials for parents. Face to face interviews were conducted to capture the course of provider interaction with and use of the intervention from initial training to the time of the interview 2-?years later. The qualitative analysis uncovered a variety of themes relevant to understanding the complex interplay of factors that impact program use. These themes provide a rich source of data for future directions in implementation research.