Comparative assessment of two ceramic cutting tools on surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 steel: including 2D and 3D surface topography

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：A. Khellaf ; H. Aouici ; S. Smaiah…
• 关键词：Hard turning ; AISI H11 steel ; Ceramic ; Surface roughness ; ANOVA ; RSM
• 刊名：The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：March 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：89
• 期：1-4
• 页码：333-354
• 全文大小：
• 刊物类别：Engineering
• 刊物主题：Industrial and Production Engineering; Media Management; Mechanical Engineering; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD, CAE) and Design;
• 出版者：Springer London
• ISSN：1433-3015
• 卷排序：89

文摘

This paper presents a comparison of surface roughness between both ceramic cutting tools namely, TiN coated mixed ceramic CC6050 and uncoated mixed ceramic CC650 when machining hardened hot work steel X38CrMoV5-1 [AISI H11] treated at 50 HRC. A mathematical model, relating surface roughness criteria and main factors such as cutting radius, cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut, was developed using response surface methodology (RSM) and its adequacy was checked by regression analysis. The effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness is evaluated and the optimum cutting conditions to minimize the surface roughness are determined. A multiple linear models have been established between the cutting parameters and the surface roughness using response surface methodology. The experimental results reveal that the most significant machining parameter for surface roughness is the feed followed by cutting radius. Also the determined optimal conditions really reduce the surface roughness on the machining of AISI H11 steels within the ranges of parameters studied. In addition, excellent surface roughness was obtained in hard turning using CC650 tools. The coated ceramic tools had no advantage over CC650 from the point of view of surface roughness.