Influence of Ti additions on the martensitic phase transformation and mechanical properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Safaa N. Saud ; E. Hamzah ; T. Abubakar…
- 关键词：Cu–Al–Ni SMA ; Martensitic transformation ; X ; phase ; Shape memory effect
- 刊名：Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：October 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：118
- 期：1
- 页码：111-122
- 全文大小：3,584 KB
- 参考文献：1. Ibarra A, Juan JS, Bocanegra EH, Nó ML. Thermo-mechanical characterization of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys elaborated by powder metallurgy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;438-40:782-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.053" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
2. Recarte V, Pérez-Landazábal JI, Nó ML, San J. Juan, Study by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy of the elastic constants of the β phase in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;370:488-1. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.06.004" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
3. Font J, Cesari E, Muntasell J, Pons J. Thermomechanical cycling in Cu–Al–Ni-based melt-spun shape-memory ribbons. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;354:207-1. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00003-0" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
4. Pérez-Landazábal JI, Recarte V, Sánchez-Alarcos V, Nó ML, Juan JS. Study of the stability and decomposition process of the β phase in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;438-40:734-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.066" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
5. Saburi T, Wayman CM. Crystallographic similarities in shape memory martensites. Acta Metall. 1979;27:979-5. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(79)90186-X" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
6. Van Humbeeck J, Van Hulle D, Delacey L. two-stage martensite transformation in a Cu-13. 99 mass Al-3. 5 mass% Ni alloy. Trans Jpn Inst Met. 1987;28:383-1. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2320/matertrans1960.28.383" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
7. Gastien R, Corbellani C, Alvarez Villar H, Sade M, Lovey F. Pseudoelastic cycling in Cu-4.3 Al-.1 Ni (wt%) single crystals. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;349:191-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00789-X" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
8. Gastien R, Corbellani C, Sade M, Lovey F. Thermal and pseudoelastic cycling in Cu-4.1 Al-.2 Ni (wt%) single crystals. Acta Mater. 2005;53:1685-1. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.018" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
9. Sar? U, Aksoy ?. Electron microscopy study of 2H and 18R martensites in Cu-1.92?wt% Al-.78?wt% Ni shape memory alloy. J Alloy Compd. 2006;417:138-2. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.09.049" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
10. Recarte V, Pérez-Sáez RB, San Juan J, Bocanegra EH, Nó ML. Influence of Al and Ni concentration on the Martensitic transformation in Cu–Al–Ni shape-memory alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 2002;33:2581-1. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0379-8" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
11. Wei ZG, Peng HY, Yang DZ, Chung CY, Lai JKL. Reverse transformations in CuA1NiMnTi alloy at elevated temperatures. Acta Mater. 1996;44:1189-9. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1359-6454(95)00233-2" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
12. Morris MA, Gunter S. Effect of heat treatment and thermal cycling on transformation temperatures of ductile Cu–Al–Ni–Mn–B alloys. Scripta Metallurgica et Materiala. 1992;26(11):1663-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-716X(92)90530-R" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
13. Sar? U, K?r?nd? T. Effects of deformation on microstructure and mechanical properties of a Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy. Mater Charact. 2008;59:920-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2007.07.017" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
14. Yildiz K, Kok M. Study of martensite transformation and microstructural evolution of Cu–Al–Ni–Fe shape memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;115:1509-4. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3409-4" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
15. Karagoz Z, Canbay CA. Relationship between transformation temperatures and alloying elements in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;114:1069-4. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3145-9" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
16. Sutou Y, Omori T, Yamauchi K, Ono N, Kainuma R, Ishida K. Effect of grain size and texture on pseudoelasticity in Cu–Al–Mn-based shape memory wire. Acta Mater. 2005;53:4121-3. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.013" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
17. Adachi K, Shoji K, Hamada Y. Formation of (X) phases and origin of grain refinement effect in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys added with titanium. ISIJ Int. 1989;29:378-7. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.29.378" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
18. Sari U. Influences of 2.5?wt% Mn addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Int J Miner Metall Mater. 2010;17:192-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12613-010-0212-0" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
19. Chang SH. Influence of chemical composition on the damping characteristics of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Mater Chem Phys. 2011;125:358-3. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.09.077" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
20. Nishiyama Z, Fine ME, Wayman CM. Martensitic transformation. New York: Academic Press; 1978.
21. Hurtado I, Ratchev P, Van Humbeeck J, Delaey L. A fundamental study of the X-phase precipitation in Cu–Al–Ni–Ti-Mn) shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 1995;44:3299-06. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1359-6454(95)00435-1" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
22. Lee JS, Wayman CM. Grain refinement of a Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy by Ti and Zr additions. Trans Jpn Inst Met. 1986;27:584-1. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2320/matertrans1960.27.584" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
23. Ratchev P, Van Humbeeck J, Delaey L. On the formation of 2H stacking sequence in 18R martensite plates in a precipitate containing CuAlNiTiMn alloy. Acta Metall Mater. 1993;41(8):2441-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(93)90324-L" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
24. Malarría J, Elgoyhen C, Vermaut P, Ochin P, Portier R. Shape memory properties of Cu-based thin tapes obtained by rapid solidification methods. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;438-40:763-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.122" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
25. Dutkiewicz J, Pons J, Cesari E. Effect of γ precipitates on the martensitic transformation in Cu–Al–Mn alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1992;158:119-8. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(92)90142-N" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
26. Bouabdallah M, Baguenane-Benalia G, Saadi A, Cheniti H, Gachon J-C, Patoor E. Precipitation sequence during ageing in β1 phase of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;112:279-3. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-012-2837-x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
27. Xuan JBQ, Hsu TY. The effect of martensite ordering on shape memory effect in a copper–zinc–aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Eng. 1987;93:205-1. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(87)90425-3" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
28. Salzbrenner RJ, Cohen M. On the thermodynamics of thermoelastic martensitic transformations. Acta Metall. 1979;27:739-8. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(79)90107-X" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
29. Adigüzel O. Martensite ordering and stabilization in copper based shape memory alloys. Mater Res Bull. 1995;30:755-0. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(95)00053-4" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
30. Sampath V. Studies on the effect of grain refinement and thermal processing on shape memory characteristics of Cu–Al–Ni alloys. Smart Mater Struct. 2005;14:S253-0. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/14/5/013" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
31. Balo ?N, Sel N. Effects of thermal aging on transformation temperatures and some physical parameters of Cu-13.5?wt% Al-4?wt% Ni shape memory alloy. Thermochim Acta. 2012;536:1-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2012.02.007" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
32. Yang G-S, Lee J-K, Jang W-Y. Effect of grain refinement on phase transformation behavior and mechanical properties of Cu-based alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2009;19:979-3. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60390-8" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
33. Aydogdu A, Aydogdu Y, Adiguzel O. Long-term ageing behaviour of martensite in shape memory Cu–Al–Ni alloys. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;153-54:164-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.198" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
34. Cullity BD, Stock SR. Elements of X-ray diffraction. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2001.
35. Patterson AL. The Scherrer Formula for X-ray Particle Size Determination. Phys Rev. 1939;56:978-2. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.978" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
36. Tatar C. Gamma irradiation-induced evolution of the transformation temperatures and thermodynamic parameters in a CuZnAl shape memory alloy. Thermochim Acta. 2005;437:121-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2005.06.030" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
37. Ortín J, Planes A. Thermodynamics of thermoelastic martensitic transformations. Acta Metall. 1989;37:1433-1. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(89)90175-2" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
38. Mallik US, Sampath V. Influence of aluminum and manganese concentration on the shape memory characteristics of Cu–Al–Mn shape memory alloys. J Alloy Compd. 2008;459:142-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.254" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
39. Saiji Matsuoka MH, Oshima R, Eiichi Fujita F. Improvement of ductility of melt spun Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy ribbons by addition of Ti or Zr. Jpn J Appl Phys. 1983;22:528-0. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.22.L528" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef - 作者单位：Safaa N. Saud (1)
E. Hamzah (1)
T. Abubakar (1)
Mohd Zamri (1) (2)
Masaki Tanemura (2)
1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
2. Department of Frontier Materials, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan - ISSN：1572-8943
文摘
The effect of Ti additions on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys (SMA) was studied by means of a differential scanning calorimeter, field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), a tensile test, a hardness test, and a shape memory effect test. The experimental results show that the Ti additions have an effective influence on the phase transformation behavior through generating a new phase into the microstructure, which is known as X-phase and/or controlling the grain size. The results of the XRD confirmed that the X-phase is a combination of two compounds, AlNi2Ti and Ti3·3Al. Nevertheless, it was found that with 0.7?mass% of Ti, the best phase transformation temperatures and mechanical properties were obtained. These improvements were due to the highest existence of the X-phase into the alloy along with a noticeable decrement of grain size. The Ti additions to the Cu–Al–Ni SMA were found to increase the ductility from 1.65 to 3.2?%, corresponding with increasing the strain recovery by the shape memory effect from 50 to 100?%; in other words, a complete recovery occurred after Ti additions.