Item to decision mapping in rapid response learning

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：David M. Schnyer (1) (2) (3)
  Ian G. Dobbins (5)
  Lindsay Nicholls (1)
  Sarah Davis (1)
  Mieke Verfaellie (1)
  Daniel L. Schacter (6)
  
• 刊名：Memory & Cognition
• 出版年：2007
• 出版时间：September 2007
• 年：2007
• 卷：35
• 期：6
• 页码：1472-1482
• 全文大小：166KB
• 参考文献：1. Biederman, I. , &Cooper, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. / Perception,20, 585鈥?93. CrossRef
  2. Biederman, I. , &Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depthrotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1162鈥?182. CrossRef
  3. Bowers, J. S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 83鈥?9. CrossRef
  4. Buckner, R. L., Goodman, J., Burock, M., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. , et al. (1998). Functional-anatomic correlates of object priming in humans revealed by rapid presentation event-related fMRI. / Neuron,20, 285鈥?96. CrossRef
  5. Burgund, E. D. , &Marsolek, C. (1997). Letter-case-specific priming in the right cerebral hemisphere with a form-specific perceptual identification task. / Brain & Cognition,35, 239鈥?58. CrossRef
  6. Cave, C. B., Bost, P. R. , &Cobb, R. E. (1996). Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 639鈥?53. CrossRef
  7. Chun, M. M. , &Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. / Nature Neuroscience,2, 844鈥?47. CrossRef
  8. Dennis, I. , &Schmidt, K. (2003). Associative processes in repetition priming. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 523鈥?38. CrossRef
  9. Dobbins, I. G., Schnyer, D. M., Verfaellie, M. , &Schacter, D. L. (2004). Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. / Nature,428, 316鈥?19. CrossRef
  10. Fisk, A. D. , &Schneider, W. (1984). Consistent attending versus consistent responding in visual search: Task versus component consistency in automatic processing development. / Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 330鈥?32.
  11. Gonsalves, B. , &Paller, K. A. (2000). Brain potentials associated with recollective processing of spoken words. / Memory & Cognition,28, 321鈥?30. CrossRef
  12. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. / Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513鈥?41. CrossRef
  13. Koutstaal, W., Wagner, A. D., Rotte, M., Maril, A., Buckner, R. L. , &Schacter, D. L. (2001). Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform gyrus. / Neuropsychologia,39, 184鈥?99. CrossRef
  14. Lawson, R. (2004). Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects. / Memory & Cognition,32, 1170鈥?181. CrossRef
  15. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. / Psychological Review,95, 492鈥?27. CrossRef
  16. Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? / Cognitive Psychology,22, 1鈥?5. CrossRef
  17. Logan, G. D. , &Etherton, J. L. (1994). What is learned during automatization? The role of attention in constructing an instance. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1022鈥?050. CrossRef
  18. Logan, G. D., Taylor, S. E. , &Etherton, J. L. (1996). Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 620鈥?38. CrossRef
  19. Marsolek, C. [J.] (2004). Abstractionist versus exemplar-based theories of visual word priming: A subsystems resolution. / Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 1233鈥?259.
  20. Marsolek, C. J. , &Burgund, E. D. (2003). Visual recognition and priming of incomplete objects: The influence of stimulus and task demands. In J. S. Bowers & C. J. Marsolek (Eds.), / Rethinking implicit memory (pp. 139鈥?56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 324鈥?54. CrossRef
  22. Roediger, H. L. , III, &Srinivas, K. (1993). Specificity of operations in perceptual priming. In P. Graf & M. E. Masson (Eds.), / Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development and neurspsychology (pp. 17鈥?8). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  23. Rugg, M. D. (1995). Event-related potential studies of human memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), / The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 789鈥?01). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  24. Schacter, D. L. (1985). Multiple forms of memory in humans and animals. In N. M. Weinberger, J. L. McGaugh, & G. Lynch (Eds.), / Memory systems of the brain (pp. 351鈥?79). New York: Guilford.
  25. Schacter, D. L. (1994). Priming and multiple memory systems: Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving( Eds.), / Memory Systems 1994 (pp. 233鈥?68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  26. Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J. , &Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), / Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47鈥?5). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  27. Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G. , &Schnyer, D. M. (2004). Specificity of priming: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. / Nature Reviews Neuroscience,5, 853鈥?62. CrossRef
  28. Schnyer, D. M., Dobbins, I. G., Nicholls, L., Schacter, D. L., & Verfaellie, M. (2005, November). / Rapid decision learning alters repetition-related components of left frontal and temporal regions: Evidence from meg recordings during repetition priming. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC.
  29. Schnyer, D. M., Dobbins, I. G., Nicholls, L., Schacter, D. L. , &Verfaellie, M. (2006). Rapid response learning in amnesia: Delineating associative learning components in repetition priming. / Neuropsychologia,44, 140鈥?49. CrossRef
  30. Simons, J. S., Koutstaal, W., Prince, S., Wagner, A. D. , &Schacter, D. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: Evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex. / Neuro-Image,19, 613鈥?26.
  31. Srinivas, K. , &Verfaellie, M. (2000). Orientation effects in amnesics鈥?recognition memory: Familiarity-based access to object attributes. / Journal of Memory & Language,43, 274鈥?90. CrossRef
  32. Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word indentification. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 339鈥?63. CrossRef
  33. Vaidya, C. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Verfaellie, M., Fleischman, D. , &Askari, N. (1998). Font-specific priming following global amnesia and occipital lobe damage. / Neuropsychology,12, 183鈥?92. CrossRef
  34. Wiggs, C. L. , &Martin, A. (1998). Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. / Current Opinions in Neurobiology,8, 227鈥?33. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：David M. Schnyer (1) (2) (3)
  Ian G. Dobbins (5)
  Lindsay Nicholls (1)
  Sarah Davis (1)
  Mieke Verfaellie (1)
  Daniel L. Schacter (6)
  
  1. Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
  2. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  3. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts
  5. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  6. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  

文摘

Repeated classification of a visually presented stimulus rapidly leads to a form of response learning that bypasses the original evaluation in favor of a more efficient response mechanism. In two experiments, we examined the level of input and output representations that make up this form of learning. In Experiment 1, alterations in the finger mapping of the output response had no effect on the expression of response learning, demonstrating that a classification decision, not motor output, is associated with repeated items. In Experiments 2A and 2B, we tested whether response learning would transfer across different visual exemplars of a studied item. There was no evidence of transfer to different visual exemplars, even when these exemplars were judged to be highly visually similar. Taken together, these results indicate that response learning consists of the formation of an association between a specific visual representation and a classification decision.