Schicksal als Aufgabe

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Prof. Dr. med. Giovanni Maio M.A. phil. (1) <br><br>1. Lehrstuhl f眉r Medizinethik ; Institut f眉r Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin ; Albert-Ludwigs-Universit盲t Freiburg ; Stefan-Meier-Str. 26 ; 79104 ; Freiburg i.聽Br. ; Deutschland <br>
• 关键词：Schicksal ; Annahme seiner selbst ; Machbarkeitsdenken ; Krisensituationen ; Freiheit ; Fate ; Acceptance of oneself ; Feasibility thinking ; Crisis situations ; Freedom
• 刊名：Psychotherapeut
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：March 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：60
• 期：2
• 页码：129-134
• 全文大小：260 KB
• 参考文献：1. Enders M (2011) Das Schicksal in der Antike und seine Bedeutung f眉r das Machbarkeitsdenken heute. Imago Hominis. Quartalschrift f眉r Medizinische Anthropologie und Bioethik 18(2011)2:121鈥?36 <br> 2. Guardini, R (1993) Ethik. Vorlesungen an der Universit盲t M眉nchen. Matthias Gr眉newald, Mainz <br> 3. Guardini, R (1994) Freiheit, Gnade, Schicksal. Matthias-Gr眉newald, Mainz <br> 4. Maio, G (2011) Abschaffung des Schicksals?. Herder, Freiburg <br> 5. Maio, G (2014) Medizin ohne Ma脽? Vom Diktat des Machbaren zu einer Ethik der Besonnenheit. Trias, Stuttgart <br> 6. Maio G (2014b) Gesch盲ftsmodell Gesundheit. Wie der Markt die Heilkunst abschafft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. Seneca: Epistulae ad Lucilium. Briefe an Lucillius <br> 7. Cicero: 脺ber das Schicksal <br> 8. Erich F (1996) Es ist was es ist. Berlin <br> 9. Kierkegaard S (1997) Die Krankheit zum Tode Reclam,. Leipzig <br> 10. Marolleau J (1982) Die Zukunftsgesellschaft. Econ, M眉nchen <br> 11. Seneca, Epistemologie 107,11 <br>
• 刊物类别：Behavioral Science
• 刊物主题：Psychology<br>Psychology<br>Psychotherapy<br>Psychoanalysis<br>
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1432-2080

文摘

In the modern era fate is viewed merely as that which should not be. As an after-effect of an excessive feasibility thinking it is sometimes suggested that man could be totally freed from fate by taking everything under his own power of control. And yet man overlooks that he is inevitably experiencer and, therefore, always imprinted by that which befalls him. And he overlooks that fate as the entirety of the given still determines the whole of life and that the freedom of man will only be possible in the first place in view of the given. In order to help people in crisis situations it is important to think about the fluid boundary between the active gestalt and the assumption of the given and to realize that without the basic setting of the assumption of the given and without acquisition of the readiness to adapt oneself within the given, a good life will not be possible.