参考文献:1.Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Inst Course Lect 5:261–274 2.King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(9):1302–1313 3.Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(8):1169–1181 4.Gille O, Champain N, Benchikh-El-Fegoun A, Vital JM, Skalli W (2007) Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(5):568–573 5.Humbert L, De Guise JA, Aubert B, Godbout B, Skalli W (2009) 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences. Med Eng Phys 31(6):681–687 6.Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):328–333PubMed 7.Malfair D, Flemming AK, Dvorak MF, Munk PL, Vertinsky AT, Heran MK, Graeb DA (2010) Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(3 Suppl):S8–S22 8.Pruijs JE, Hageman MA, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen JC (1994) Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol 23(7):517–520 9.Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):320–327PubMed 10.Schumpe G, Hofmann P, Rössler H (1984) Problematik der Verlaufskontrolle bei Skoliosepatienten. Z Orthop Unfall 122(3):243–254 11.Göçen S, Havitçioglu H (2001) Effect of rotation on frontal plane deformity in idiopathic scoliosis. Orthopedics 24(3):265–268 12.Stagnara P (1968) Medical observation and tests for scoliosis. Rev Lyon Med 17(9):391–401 13.du Peloux J, Fauchet R, Faucon B, Stagnara P (1965) Le plan d’élection pour l’examen radiologique des cyphoscolioses. Rev Chir Orthop 51:517–524PubMed 14.Deschênes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, Labelle H, Dubois J, Miron MC, Parent S (2010) Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 3(9):989–994 15.Glaser DA, Doan J, Newton PO (2012) Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(16):1391–1397 16.Carreau J, Bastrom T, Petcharaporn M, Schulte C, Marks M, Illés T, Somoskeöy S, Newton PO (2014) Computer-generated, three-dimensional spine model from biplanar radiographs: a validity study in idiopathic scoliosis curves greater than 50 degrees. Spine Deform 2(2):81–88 17.Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O’Brien MF (2006) Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15(11):1240–1246 18.Hecquet J, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G (1998) Access to a three-dimensional measure of vertebral axial rotation. Eur Spine J 7(3):206–211PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef 19.Krismer M, Sterzinger W, Haid C, Frischhut B, Bauer R (1996) Axial rotation measurement of scoliotic vertebrae by means of computed tomography scans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(5):576–581
作者单位:Samuel L. Schmid (1) F. M. Buck (1) T. Böni (1) M. Farshad (1)
1. Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
刊物类别:Medicine
刊物主题:Medicine & Public Health Surgical Orthopedics Neurosurgery
出版者:Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
ISSN:1432-0932
文摘
Background The Cobb angle measurement is well established for the measurement of coronal deformity aspect of scoliotic curves. The effect of positional differences in relation to the apex side of the scoliosis is not yet fully quantified. While theoretically plausible that positioning error with rotation toward the apex of the scoliosis would decrease the Cobb angle, the relations are not investigated yet and were object of this study.