Newborn hearing screening outcomes during the first decade of the program in a reference hospital from Turkey
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Yusuf Kemal Kemaloğlu ; Çağıl Gökdoğan…
- 关键词：Newborn hearing screening ; Hearing loss ; Early detection ; Developing countries ; Otoacoustic emissions ; Auditory brainstem response
- 刊名：European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：May 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：273
- 期：5
- 页码：1143-1149
- 全文大小：525 KB
- 参考文献：1.White KR, Behrens TR (1993) The Rhode Island hearing assessment project implications for universal newborn hearing screening. Sem Hear 14:1–119CrossRef
2.White KR, Vohr BR, Maxon AB, Behrens TR, McPherson MG, Mauk GW (1994) Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 29:203–217CrossRef PubMed
3.National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement (1993) Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 27:215–227CrossRef
4.White KR (2003) The current status of EHDI programs in the United States. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 79:79–88CrossRef
5.Davis A, Hind S (2003) The newborn hearing screening programme in England. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67:193–196CrossRef
6.Grandori F (1998) European consensus statement on neonatal hearing screening. Finalized at the European consensus development conference on neonatal hearing screening 15–16 May 1998, Milan, Italy. Scand Audiol 27:259–260
7.Yüksel Ş (1996) Yenidoğanda Transient otoakustik emisyon (Transient otoacoustic emission in newborns). Dissertation, Marmara University
8.Genç A, Başar F, Kayıkçı ME, Türkyılmaz D, Fırat Z, Duran Ö, Ulusoy Ö, Belgin E, Budak B, Tekinalp G, Yurdakök M, Yiğit Ş, Korkmaz A (2005) Hacettepe Üniversitesi yenidoğan işitme taraması bulguları (Hacettepe University, newborn hearing screening findings). Çocuk Sağ Hast Derg 48:119–124
9.Bolat H, Bebitoglu FG, Ozbas S, Altunsu AT, Köse MR (2009) National newborn hearing screening program in Turkey: struggles and implementations between 2004 and 2008. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 73:1621–1623. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.002 CrossRef
10.Bolat H, Genç A (2012) Türkiye Ulusal Yenidoğan İşitme Taraması Programı: Tarihçesi ve Prensipleri. Turkiye Klinikleri (Turkish national newborn hearing screening program: its history and principles) JENT Spec Top 5:11–14
11.Kemaloğlu YK (2014) Yenidoğan İşitme Taramaları (Newborn Hearing Screening). In: Belgin E (ed) Temel Odyoloji (basic audiology). Güneş Tıp Kitabevi, Ankara, pp 191–217
12.Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (2007) Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatr 120:898–921
13.Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL (1998) Language of early and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatr 102:1161–1171CrossRef
14.Moeller MP (2000) Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatr 106:e43CrossRef
15.Kennedy CR, McCann DC, Campbell MJ, Law CM, Mullee M, Petrou S, Watkin P, Worsfold S, Yuen HM, Stevenson J (2006) Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Eng J Med 354:2131–2141CrossRef
16.Turkish Statistical Institute (2014) Turkish statistical institute web. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do;jsessionid=kCQjJDchpnQvdxLyFT5nf00TpBJYJ2BD4H9zdn1W85xcy1fz9vRM!-568420742 . Accessed 20 Oct 2014
17.Kemaloğlu YK (2012) Türkiye’de İşitme Kayıplarının ve İşitme Engelinin Genel Görünümü (The general view of hearing losses and hearing impairment in Turkey). JENT Spec Top 5:1–10
18.Kemaloğlu YK (in press) Türkiye’de Sağırların Görünürlüğü ve Toplumsal ve Eğitimsel Sorunları Üzerine Demografik Bir İnceleme (A demographic analysis on the outlook of deaf and their social and educational problems in Turkey). In: Arık E (ed) Türk İşaret Dili Araştırmaları (Turkish Sign Language Research), Koç Ün Yay, Istanbul
19.Ozcebe E, Sevinc S, Belgin E (2005) The ages of suspicion, identification, amplification and intervention in children with hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69:1081–1087CrossRef PubMed
20.Belgin E (1992) Ülkemizde işitme kayıplarının nedenleri-özel eğitim yaklaşımları (Reasons for hearing loss and special educational approaches in our country). Özel Eğ Derg 1:6–7
21.Gürboğa Ç, Kargın T (2003) İşitme engelli yetişkinlerin farklı ortamlarda kullandıkları iletişim yöntemlerinin/becerilerinin incelenmesi (Analysis of communication methods/skills used by adults with hearing impairment in various environments). JFES 36:51–64
22.Zeshan U (2003) Aspects of Turk İşaret Dili (Turkish sign language). Sign Lang Linguist 6:43–75CrossRef
23.Kemaloğlu YK, Yaprak Kemaloğlu P (2012) The history of sign language and deaf education in Turkey. KBB Iht Derg 22:65–76
24.Ruben RJ (2010) Screening from an economic point. In: Driscoll CJ, McPherson B (eds) Newborn screening systems, the complete perspective. Plural Publ, San Diego, pp 23–29
25.Erturk BB, Genc GA, Ozkan S (2010) Comparison of hearing screening protocols for universal newborn hearing screening in Turkey. Int Adv Otol 6:223–230
26.Tasci Y, Muderris II, Erkaya S, Altinbas S, Yucel H, Haberal A (2010) Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey. Child Care Health Dev 36:317–322. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01029 CrossRef PubMed
27.Tatli MM, Serbetcioglu MB, Duman N, Kumral A, Kirkim G, Ogun B, Ozkan H (2007) Feasibility of neonatal hearing screening program with two-stage transient otoacoustic emissions in Turkey. Pediatr Int 49:161–166CrossRef PubMed
28.Başar F, Aygün C, Güven AG (2007) On Dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Yenidoğan İşitme Taraması (YEDİT) İlk Yıl Sonuçları (The first year results of On Dokuz Mayıs University newborn hearing screening (NHS)). OMU Tıp Derg 24:43–51
29.Arslan S, Işık AÜ, İmamoğlu M, Topbaş M, Aslan Y, Ural A (2013) Universal newborn hearing screening; automated transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. B-ENT 9:123–131
30.Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistikler Enstitüsü (2004) Turkey disability survey-2002. Publication number: 2913, Devlet İstatistikler Enst. Matbaası, Ankara. http://www.eyh.gov.tr/tr/8245/Turkiye-Engelliler-Arastirmasi-Temel-Gostergeleri
31.Maxon AB, White KR, Culpepper B (1997) Maintaining acceptably ow referral rates in TEOAE-based newborn hearing screening programs. J Commun Disord 30:457–475CrossRef PubMed
32.White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR (1993) Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island assessment. Proj Sem Hear 14:18–29
33.Chapchap MJ, Segre CM (2001) Universal newborn hearing screening and transient evoked otoacoustic emission: new concepts in Brazil. Scand Audiol Suppl 53:33–36CrossRef PubMed
34.Bevilacqua MC, KdeF Alvarenga, Costa OA, Moret AL (2010) The universal newborn hearing screening in Brazil: from identification to intervention. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:510–515. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.02.009 CrossRef PubMed
35.Pastorino G, Sergi P, Mastrangelo M, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Parazzini M, Mosca F, Pugni L, Grandori F (2005) The Milan project: a newborn hearing screening programme. Acta Paediatr 94:458–463CrossRef PubMed
36.Ciorba A, Hatzopoulos S, Busi M, Guerrini P, Petruccelli J, Martini A (2008) The universal newborn hearing screening program at the University Hospital of Ferrara: focus on costs and software solutions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:807–816. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.02.011 CrossRef PubMed
37.Rai N, Thakur N (2013) Universal screening of newborns to detect hearing impairment—is it necessary? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77:æ1036–æ1041. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.04.006
38.Deltenre P, Mansbach AL, Bozet C, Christiaens F, Barthelemy P, Paulissen D, Renglet T (1999) Auditory neuropathy with preserved cochlear microphonics and secondary loss of otoacoustic emissions. Audiol 38:187–195CrossRef
39.Kirkim G, Serbetcioglu B, Erdag TK, Ceryan K (2008) The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:1461–1469. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.010 CrossRef PubMed
40.Bamford J, Uus K, Davis A (2005) Screening for hearing loss in childhood: issues, evidence and current approaches in the UK. Med Screen 12:119–124CrossRef - 作者单位：Yusuf Kemal Kemaloğlu (1)
Çağıl Gökdoğan (2)
Bülent Gündüz (2)
Eray Esra Önal (3)
Canan Türkyılmaz (3)
Yıldız Atalay (3)
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Kat: 14 Konya Yolu, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey
2. Audiology Subdivision, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
3. Department of Neonatology, Pediatrics, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Beşevler, Ankara, Turkey - 刊物类别：Medicine
- 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
Otorhinolaryngology
Neurosurgery
Head and Neck Surgery - 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
- ISSN：1434-4726
文摘
In this study, the authors report the results of a three-stage newborn hearing screening (NHS) program for well babies at the Gazi University Hospital (GUH) in Ankara between 2003 and 2013. GUH-NHS was performed by automated transient evoked otoacoustic emission (a-TEOAE) at the first and second steps and by automated brainstem audiometry (a-ABR) at the third step. The data were analysed to assess not only rate of congenital permanent hearing loss (CPHL), but also the effectiveness of the program during the years. A total of 18,470 well babies were tested. The data showed that coverage ratio for the GUH-born babies was increased and more outside-born babies (OBB) were admitted by time (means 84.31 and 11.28 %, respectively). Mean CPHL was found to be 0.26 %. Mean referral rate was decreased to 0.81 % by a-ABR from 2.16 % by a-TEOAE. Mean of missed cases in any stage of GUH-NHS was 4.88 %. It was seen that neither CPHL nor referral rate, but only ratio of missed ones presented increase in parallel to increment in OBB. This paper first presents that clinically acceptable screening procedures developed in GUH by time, and secondly higher rate of CPHL in Turkey than in the Western countries, and benefits of third stage screening by a-ABR because it prevented referral of 251 children (1.29 %) to the clinical tests. We think that this number is reasonably important regarding not only economical point of view, but also waiting lists in the audiology departments in a developing country, in which audiological service is still limited.