Assessment of life cycle environmental benefits of an industrial symbiosis cluster in China

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Fei Yu (1)
  Feng Han (1)
  Zhaojie Cui (1)
  
  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering ; Shandong University ; No. 27 South Shanda Road ; Jinan ; 250199 ; People鈥檚 Republic of China
  
• 关键词：Industrial symbiosis ; Life cycle assessment ; By ; product exchange ; Environmental benefit
• 刊名：Environmental Science and Pollution Research
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：April 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：22
• 期：7
• 页码：5511-5518
• 全文大小：239 KB
• 参考文献：1. Albino, V, Dietzenbacher, E, K眉htz, S (2003) Analysing materials and energy flows in an industrial district using an enterprise input鈥搊utput model. Econ Syst Res 15: pp. 457-480 CrossRef
  2. Bai L, Qiao Q, Yao Y, Guo J, Xie M (2014): Insights on the development progress of national demonstration eco-industrial parks in China. J Clean Prod
  3. Berkel, RV, Fujita, T, Hashimoto, S, Fujii, M (2009) Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. Environ Sci Technol 43: pp. 1271-1281 CrossRef
  4. Boons, F, Spekkink, W, Mouzakitis, Y (2011) The dynamics of industrial symbiosis: a proposal for a conceptual framework based upon a comprehensive literature review. J Clean Prod 19: pp. 905-911 CrossRef
  5. Chaya, W, Gheewala, SH (2007) Life cycle assessment of MSW-to-energy schemes in Thailand. J Clean Prod 15: pp. 1463-1468 CrossRef
  6. Chertow, MR (2000) Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25: pp. 313-337 CrossRef
  7. Chertow, MR, Lombardi, DR (2005) Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environ Sci Technol 39: pp. 6535-6541 CrossRef
  8. Chertow, MR (2007) 鈥淯ncovering鈥?industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 11: pp. 11-30 CrossRef
  9. Eckelman, MJ, Chertow, MR (2009) Quantifying life cycle environmental benefits from the reuse of industrial materials in Pennsylvania. Environ Sci Technol 43: pp. 2550-2556 CrossRef
  10. Eckelman, MJ, Chertow, MR (2013) Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of a US industrial symbiosis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18: pp. 1524-1532 CrossRef
  11. Ehrenfeld J, Chertow MR (2002): Industrial symbiosis: the legacy of Kalundborg. A handbook of industrial ecology, 334鈥?50
  12. Fu, B, Zhuang, X, Jiang, G, Shi, J, Lu, Y (2007) Feature: environmental problems and challenges in China. Environ Sci Technol 41: pp. 7597-7602 CrossRef
  13. Geng, Y, Zhang, P, Cote, RP, Qi, Y (2008) Evaluating the applicability of the Chinese eco-industrial park standard in two industrial zones. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 15: pp. 543-552 CrossRef
  14. Gibbs, D, Deutz, P (2005) Implementing industrial ecology? Planning for eco-industrial parks in the USA. Geoforum 36: pp. 452-464 CrossRef
  15. Liu, Q, Jiang, P, Zhao, J, Zhang, B, Bian, H, Qian, G (2011) Life cycle assessment of an industrial symbiosis based on energy recovery from dried sludge and used oil. J Clean Prod 19: pp. 1700-1708 CrossRef
  16. Liu X, Wang H, Chen J (2010) Method and basic model for development of Chinese reference life cycle database of fundamental industries. Acta Sci Circumst 30:2136鈥?144
  17. Mattila, T, Lehtoranta, S, Sokka, L, Melanen, M, Nissinen, A (2012) Methodological aspects of applying life cycle assessment to industrial symbioses. J Ind Ecol 16: pp. 51-60 CrossRef
  18. Mattila, TJ, Pakarinen, S, Sokka, L (2010) Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis-a comparison of process-, hybrid and input鈥搊utput life cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol 44: pp. 4309-4314 CrossRef
  19. Mirata, M (2004) Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges. J Clean Prod 12: pp. 967-983 CrossRef
  20. Park, H-S, Rene, ER, Choi, S-M, Chiu, AS (2008) Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea鈥攆rom spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. J Environ Manag 87: pp. 1-13 CrossRef
  21. Sendra, C, Gabarrell, X, Vicent, T (2007) Material flow analysis adapted to an industrial area. J Clean Prod 15: pp. 1706-1715 CrossRef
  22. Shi, H, Chertow, M, Song, Y (2010) Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin economic-technological development area in China. J Clean Prod 18: pp. 191-199 CrossRef
  23. Sokka, L, Lehtoranta, S, Nissinen, A, Melanen, M (2011) Analyzing the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 15: pp. 137-155 CrossRef
  24. Tian, J, Liu, W, Lai, B, Li, X, Chen, L (2013) Study of the performance of eco-industrial park development in China. J Clean Prod 30: pp. 1e9
  25. Berkel, R, Fujita, T, Hashimoto, S, Geng, Y (2009) Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: analysis of the Eco-Town program 1997鈥?006. J Environ Manag 90: pp. 1544-1556 CrossRef
  26. Zhang, H, Hara, K, Yabar, H, Yamaguchi, Y, Uwasu, M, Morioka, T (2009) Comparative analysis of socio-economic and environmental performances for Chinese EIPs: case studies in Baotou, Suzhou, and Shanghai. Sustain Sci 4: pp. 263-279 CrossRef
  27. Zhu, Q, Lowe, EA, BARNES, D (2007) Industrial symbiosis in China: a case study of the Guitang group. J Ind Ecol 11: pp. 31-42 CrossRef
  
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：Environment
  Environment
  Atmospheric Protection, Air Quality Control and Air Pollution
  Waste Water Technology, Water Pollution Control, Water Management and Aquatic Pollution
  Industrial Pollution Prevention
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1614-7499

文摘

Reusing industrial waste may have impressive potential environmental benefits, especially in terms of the total life cycle, and life cycle assessment (LCA) has been proved to be an effective method to evaluate industrial symbiosis (IS). Circular economy and IS have been developed for decades and have been successful in China. However, very few studies about the environmental benefit assessment of IS applied by LCA in China have been conducted. In the current article, LCA was used to evaluate the environmental benefits and costs of IS, compared with a no-IS scenario for four environmental impact categories. The results showed that four environmental benefits were avoided by the 11 symbiosis performances, namely, 41.6 thousand TJ of primary energy, 4.47 million t CO2e of greenhouse gasses, 19.7 thousand t SO2e of acidification, and 81.1 t PO4 3+e of eutrophication. Among these IS performances, the comprehensive utilization of red mud produced the most visible benefit. The results also present that energy conservation was the distinctive feature of IS in China.