Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Malignant Mammograms using Zernike Moments and SVM
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Shubhi Sharma ; Pritee Khanna
- 关键词：Computer ; aided diagnosis (CAD) ; Mammograms ; Preprocessing ; Segmentation ; Zernike moments ; Support vector machine (SVM)
- 刊名：Journal of Digital Imaging
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：February 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：28
- 期：1
- 页码：77-90
- 全文大小：1,309 KB
- 参考文献：1. Alolfe MA, Mohamed WA, Youssef A, Mohamed AS, Kadah YM: Computer aided diagnosis in digital mammography using combined support vector machine and linear discriminant analysis classification. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2009, pp 2609-612
2. Alolfe MA, Youssef A, Kadah YM, Mohamed AS: Development of a computer-aided classification system for cancer detection from digital mammograms. In: Radio Science Conference, NRSC 2008. National, IEEE, 2008, pp 1-
3. Astley S, Hutt I, Miller P, Rose P, Taylor C, Boggis C, Adamson S, Valentine T, Davies J, Armstrong J: Automation in mammography: computer vision and human perception. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 7(06):1313-338, 1993
4. Bagui SC, Bagui S, Pal K, Pal NR: Breast cancer detection using rank nearest neighbor classification rules. Pattern Recognit 36(1):-4, 2003
5. Balakumaran T, Vennila I: Detection of microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms using multiresolution based foveal algorithm. In: World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT). IEEE, 2011, pp 657-60
6. Bovik AC: Handbook of image and video processing. Access Online via Elsevier, 2010
7. Chan HP, Doi K, VYBRONY CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Lam KL, Ogura T, Wu Y, MacMahon H: Improvement in radiologists-detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Investig Radiol 25(10):1102-110, 1990
8. Cheng H, Shi X, Min R, Hu L, Cai X, Du H: Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recognit 39(4):646-68, 2006
9. Cheng HD, Cai X, Chen X, Hu L, Lou X: Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey. Pattern Recognit 36(12):2967-991, 2003
10. Cortes C, Vapnik V: Support vector machine. Mach Learn 20(3):273-97, 1995
11. Deserno TM, Soiron M, de Oliveira JE, Araújo AdA: Computer-aided diagnostics of screening mammography using content-based image retrieval. In: SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2012, pp 831, 527-31,527
12. Dheeba J, Tamil Selvi S: Screening mammogram images for abnormalities using radial basis function neural network. In: IEEE International Conference on Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICCCCT). IEEE, 2010, pp 554-59
13. Feig SA, Galkin B: Breast microcalcifications: early warning for cancer. Diagn Imag November. 1990, pp 132-38
14. Ferrari R, Frere A, Rangayyan R, Desautels J, Borges R: Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models. Med Biol Eng Comput 42(2):201-208, 2004
15. Ferrari R, Rangayyan PR, Borges R, Frere A: Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using gaussian mixture modelling. Med Biol Eng Comput 42(3):378-87, 2004
16. Ferrari R, Rangayyan R, Desautels J, Borges R, Frere A: Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms. Trans Med Imaging IEEE 23(2):232-45, 2004
17. Fu J, Lee SK, Wong ST, Yeh JY, Wang AH, Wu H: Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. Comput Med Imaging Graph 29(6):419-29, 2005
18. Giger ML: Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology. Acad Radiol 9(1):1-, 2002
19. Gulsrud TO, Husoy JH: Optimal filter-based detection of microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48(11):1272-281, 2001
20. Guzmán-Cabrera R, Guzmán-Sepúlveda J, Torres-Cisneros M, May-Arrioja D, Ruiz-Pinales J, Ibarra-Manzano O, Avi?a-Cervantes G, Parada AG: Digital image processing technique for breast cancer detection: Int J Thermophys 34:1519-5311, 2012
21. Haddadnia J, Ahmadi M, Faez K: An efficient feature extraction method with pseudo-Zernike moment in RBF neural network-based human face recognition system. EURASIP J Appl Signal Process 2003:890-01, 2003
22. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer P:The digital database for screening mammography. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. 2000, pp 212-18
23. Hwang SK, Kim WY: A novel approach to the fast computation of Zernike moments. Pattern Recognit 39(11):2065-076, 2006
24. Jasmine JL, Govardhan A, Baskaran S: Microcalcification detection in digital mammograms based on wavelet analysis and neural networks. In: International Conference on Control, Automation, Communication and Energy Conservation(INCACEC). IEEE, 2009, pp 1-
25. Kabbadj Y, Regragui F, Himmi MM: Microcalcification detection using a fuzzy inference system and support vector machines. In: International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS). IEEE, 2012, pp 312-15
26. Khotanzad A, Hong YH: Invariant image recognition by Zernike moments. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(5):489-97, 1990
27. Ko JP, Naidich DP: Computer-aided diagnosis and the evaluation of lung disease. J Thorac Imaging 19 - 刊物类别：Medicine
- 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
Imaging and Radiology - 出版者：Springer New York
- ISSN：1618-727X
文摘
This work is directed toward the development of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to detect abnormalities or suspicious areas in digital mammograms and classify them as malignant or nonmalignant. Original mammogram is preprocessed to separate the breast region from its background. To work on the suspicious area of the breast, region of interest (ROI) patches of a fixed size of 128×128 are extracted from the original large-sized digital mammograms. For training, patches are extracted manually from a preprocessed mammogram. For testing, patches are extracted from a highly dense area identified by clustering technique. For all extracted patches corresponding to a mammogram, Zernike moments of different orders are computed and stored as a feature vector. A support vector machine (SVM) is used to classify extracted ROI patches. The experimental study shows that the use of Zernike moments with order 20 and SVM classifier gives better results among other studies. The proposed system is tested on Image Retrieval In Medical Application (IRMA) reference dataset and Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) mammogram database. On IRMA reference dataset, it attains 99 % sensitivity and 99 % specificity, and on DDSM mammogram database, it obtained 97 % sensitivity and 96 % specificity. To verify the applicability of Zernike moments as a fitting texture descriptor, the performance of the proposed CAD system is compared with the other well-known texture descriptors namely gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and discrete cosine transform (DCT).