Youth–Adult Partnership: Exploring Contributions to Empowerment, Agency and Community Connections in Malaysian Youth Programs

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Steven Eric Krauss (1)
  Jessica Collura (2)
  Shepherd Zeldin (2)
  Adriana Ortega (1)
  Haslinda Abdullah (1)
  Abdul Hadi Sulaiman (1)
  
• 关键词：Adolescents ; Youth–adult partnership ; Positive youth development ; Community connections ; Personal agency ; Psychological empowerment
• 刊名：Journal of Youth and Adolescence
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：September 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：43
• 期：9
• 页码：1550-1562
• 全文大小：259 KB
• 参考文献：1. Ahmad, A. L., Rahim, S. A., Pawanteh, L., & Ahmad, F. (2012). The understanding of environmental citizenship among Malaysian youths: A study on perception and participation. / Asian Social Science, / 8(5), 85-2.
  2. Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. / Journal of Youth and Adolescence, / 16(5), 427-54. CrossRef
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. / American Psychologist, / 55, 469-80. CrossRef
  4. Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. / American Psychologist, / 57, 774-83. CrossRef
  5. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. / Perspectives on Psychological Science, / 1(2), 164-80. CrossRef
  6. Barry, C. M., & Nelson, L. J. (2005). The role of religion in the transition to adulthood for young emerging adults. / Journal of Youth and Adolescence, / 34(3), 245-55. CrossRef
  7. Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Hamilton, S. F., & Sesma, A. (2006). / Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). / The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  9. Camino, L. (2000). Youth–adult partnerships: Entering new territory in community youth work and research. / Applied Developmental Science, / 4, 11-0. CrossRef
  10. Camino, L. (2005). Pitfalls and promising practices of youth–adult partnerships: An evaluator’s reflections. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 33(1), 75-5. CrossRef
  11. Camino, L., Zeldin, R. S., Mook, C. & O’Connor, C. (2006). / Youth and adult leaders for program excellence ( / YALPE): / A practical guide for program assessment and action planning. Ithaca, NY: ACT for Youth Center of Excellence (www.actforyouth.net/?publications).
  12. Chiessi, M., Cicognani, E., & Sonn, C. (2010). Assessing sense of community on adolescents: Validating the brief scale of sense of community in adolescents (SOC-A). / Journal of Community Psychology, / 38(3), 276-92. CrossRef
  13. Christens, B. D. (2012). Targeting empowerment in community development: A community psychology approach to enhancing local power and well-being. / Community Development Journal, / 47(4), 538-54. CrossRef
  14. Christens, B. D., & Peterson, N. A. (2012). The role of empowerment in youth development: A study of sociopolitical control as mediator of ecological systems-influence on developmental outcomes. / Journal of Youth and Adolescence, / 41, 623-35. CrossRef
  15. Child Trends. (2013). Volunteering. Retrived September 10, 2013 from: http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=volunteering.
  16. Cochran, J. K., Wood, P. B., & Arneklev, B. J. (1994). Is the religiosity-delinquency relationship spurious? A test of arousal and social control theories. / Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, / 31, 92-23. CrossRef
  17. Damon, W. (2004). What is positive youth development? / Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, / 591, 13-4. CrossRef
  18. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2007). / Household income/basic amenities survey (HIS/BA). Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/index.php?lang=en.
  19. Dworkin, J. B., Larson, R., & Hansen, D. (2003). Adolescents-accounts of growth experiences in youth activities. / Journal of Youth and Adolescence, / 32, 17-6. CrossRef
  20. Evans, S. D. (2007). Youth sense of community: Voice and power in community contexts. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 35(6), 693-09. CrossRef
  21. Ferreira, P. D., Azevedo, C. N., & Menezes, I. (2012). The developmental quality of participation experiences: beyond the rhetoric that “participation is always good!- / Journal of Adolescence, / 35(3), 599-10. CrossRef
  22. Flanagan, C. A., & Christens, B. D. (2011). Youth civic development: Historical context and emerging issues. / New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, / 134, 1-. CrossRef
  23. Forum for Youth Investment. (2012). / Youth program quality assessment tool. Available at: http://www.cypq.org/downloadpqa.
  24. Ginwright, S., Noguera, P., & Cammarota, J. (2006). / Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge.
  25. Halpern, R. (2005). Instrumental relationships: A potential relational model for inner-city youth programs. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 33(1), 11-0. CrossRef
  26. Hamilton, M. A., & Hamilton, S. F. (2005). Work and service-learning as contexts for mentoring. In D. L. DuBois & M. K. Karcher (Eds.), / Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 348-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef
  27. Hamzah, A. (2005). / Helping Malaysian youth move forward: Unleashing the prime enablers. Inaugural address. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
  28. Hamzah, A., Suandi, T., & Tamam, E. (2002). / Persatuan belia di Malaysia: Perkembangan and penyerlahan potensi (Youth organizations in Malaysia: Highlighting their growth and potential). Serdang: UPM Press.
  29. Hamzah, A., Tamam, E., Krauss, S. E., Hamsan, H. H. & Dahalan, D. (2011). / Kajian keberkesanan dasar pembangunan belia negara dalam merealisasikan belia sebagai rakan pembangunan (Study of the Effectiveness of the National Youth Development Policy in Realizing Youth as Partners in Development). Unpublished report. Serdang, Malaysia: Institute for Social Science Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
  30. Hirsch, B. (2005). / A place to call home: After-school programs for urban youth. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association and New York: Teachers College Press.
  31. Jarrett, R. L., Sullivan, P. J., & Watkins, N. D. (2005). Developing social capital through participation in organized youth programs: Qualitative insights from three programs. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 33(1), 41-5. CrossRef
  32. Kaplan, D. (2009). / Structural equation modeling: Foundation and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  33. Kim, J., & Sherman, R. F. (2006). Youth as important civic actors: From the margins to the center. / National Civic Review, / 95(1), 3-. CrossRef
  34. Kirshner, B. (2007). Introduction: Youth activism as a context for learning and development. / American Behavioral Scientist, / 51(3), 367-79. CrossRef
  35. Krauss, S. E., Idris, K., Tamam, E., Suandi, T., Ismail, I. A., Bandar, N. F. A., et al. (2012). Exploring professionalism among youth work practitioners in Malaysia: A measurement development study. / Young, / 20(3), 297-22. CrossRef
  36. Krauss, S. E., Ismail, I. A., Suandi, T., Hamzah, A., Hamzah, S. R., Dahalan, D., et al. (2013). Parenting and community engagement factors as predictors of religiosity among Muslim adolescents from Malaysia. / International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, / 23(2), 87-02. CrossRef
  37. Kwan Meng, L. (2012). / Influence of mentoring on learning outcomes in a pioneering school- / based ‘International Award for Young People-programme in Malaysia. Unpublished PhD thesis. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
  38. Landsdown, G. (2001). / Promoting children’s participation in democratic decision-making. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Center.
  39. Larson, R. W., & Angus, R. M. (2011). Adolescents-development of skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think strategically. / Child Development, / 82(1), 277-94. CrossRef
  40. Larson, R., Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2004). Features of positive developmental settings. / The Prevention Researcher, / 11(2), 8-3.
  41. Larson, R. W., & Hansen, D. (2005). The development of strategic thinking: Learning to impact human systems in a youth activism program. / Human Development, / 48(6), 327-49. CrossRef
  42. Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 33, 57-4. CrossRef
  43. Lerner, R. M. (2004). / Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  44. Li, J., & Jullian, M. (2012). Developmental relationships as the active ingredient: A unifying working hypothesis of ‘‘what works’-across intervention settings. / American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, / 82(2), 157-86. CrossRef
  45. Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Personal and ecological assets and academic competence in early adolescence: The mediating role of school engagement. / Journal of youth and adolescence, 39(7), 801-15.
  46. Linds, W., Goulet, L., & Samual, A. (Eds.). (2010). / Emancipatory practices: Adult/youth engagement for social and environmental justice. Rotterham: Sense Publications.
  47. Majzub, R. M., & Rais, M. M. (2010). Boys-underachievement: Causes and strategies. / Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, / 2(2), 3160-164. CrossRef
  48. Malaysian Institute for Research in Youth Development. (2011). / Malaysian Youth Index 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.ippbm.gov.my/v3-en/index.php/component/content/article.html?id=253.
  49. Maton, K. I., & Salem, D. A. (1995). Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach. / American Journal of Community Psychology, / 23(5), 631-56. CrossRef
  50. McNeely, C. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Blum, R. W. (2002). Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. / The Journal of School Health, / 72(4), 138-46. CrossRef
  51. Meucci, S., & Schwab, M. (1997). Children and the environment: Young people’s participation in social change. / Social Justice, / 24(3), 1-0.
  52. Miller, F. (1994). Gender differences in adolescents-attitudes toward mandatory community service. / Journal of Adolescence, / 17, 381-93. CrossRef
  53. Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice-in schools lead to gains in youth development. / Teachers College Record, / 106(4), 651-88. CrossRef
  54. Moos, R. H. (1974). / Evaluating treatment environments: A social ecological approach. Hoboken: Wiley.
  55. Morton, M. H., & Montgomery, P. (2012). Empowerment-based non-formal education for Arab youth: A pilot randomized trial. / Children and Youth Services Review, / 34(2), 417-25. CrossRef
  56. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (NRC/IOM) Committee on Community Level Programs for Youth. (2002). Features of positive developmental settings. In J. Eccles, & J. Gootman (Eds.), / Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  57. Nga, J. L. H. (2009). / The roles of youth organisations in Malaysia’s political development. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Leeds: The University of Leeds.
  58. O’Donoghue, J. L., Kirshner, B., & McLaughlin, M. (2002). Introduction: Moving youth participation forward. / New Directions for Youth Development, / 96, 15-6. CrossRef
  59. Osterman, K. (2000). Students-need for belonging in the school community. / Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-67.
  60. Ozer, E. J., & Schotland, M. (2011). Psychological empowerment among urban youth measure development and relationship to psychosocial functioning. / Health Education & Behavior, / 38(4), 348-56. CrossRef
  61. Peterson, N. A., Peterson, C. H., Agre, L., Christens, B. D., & Morton, C. M. (2011). Measuring youth empowerment: Validation of a sociopolitical control scale for youth in an urban community context. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 39(5), 592-05. CrossRef
  62. Ramli, R. (2005). Malaysian youth: From government policies to grassroots aspirations. In F. Gale & S. Fahey Karcher (Eds.), / Youth in transition: The challenges of generational change in Asia (pp. 171-83). Bangkok: Regional Unit for Social and Human Sciences in Asia and the Pacific, UNESCO.
  63. Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Ellison, M. L., & Crean, T. (1997). A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. / Psychiatric services, / 48(8), 1042-047.
  64. Schlegel, A., & Barry, H, I. I. I. (1991). / Adolescence: An anthropological inquiry. New York: Free Press.
  65. Sherrod, L. R., Flanagan, C., & Youniss, J. (2002). Dimensions of citizenship and opportunities for youth development: The what, why, when, where, and who of citizenship development. / Applied Developmental Science, / 6(4), 264-72. CrossRef
  66. Small, S. A., & Kerns, D. (1993). Unwanted sexual activity among peers during early and middle adolescence: Incidence and risk factors. / Journal of Marriage and Family, / 55(4), 941-52. CrossRef
  67. Tenth Malaysia Plan, 2011-015. (2010). The economic planning unit, prime minister’s department. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Retrieved from: http://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/RMK/RMK10_Eds.pdf.
  68. Vandell, D. L., Shernoff, D. J., Pierce, K. M., Bolt, D. M., Dadisman, K., & Brown, B. B. (2005). Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). / New Directions for Youth Development, / 105, 121-29. CrossRef
  69. Whitlock, J. (2006). Youth perceptions of life at school: Contextual correlates of school connectedness in adolescence. / Applied Developmental Science, / 10, 13-9. CrossRef
  70. Whitlock, J. (2007). The role of adults, public space, and power in adolescent community connectedness. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 35(4), 499-18. CrossRef
  71. Wong, N. T., Zimmerman, M. A., & Parker, E. A. (2010). A typology of youth participation and empowerment for child and adolescent health promotion. / American Journal of Community Psychology, / 46(1-), 100-14. CrossRef
  72. World Urban Forum. (2006). / Report of the third session of the world urban forum. UN Habitat. Retrieved from: http://www.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/4077_70142_WUF3-Report-final%20%20dm1%2023%20june.REV.1.pdf.
  73. Youniss, J., Yates, M., & Su, Y. (1997). Social integration: Community service and marijuana use in high school seniors. / Journal of Adolescent Research, / 12, 245-62. CrossRef
  74. Zainab, I., Wan Ibrahim, W. A., & Elmi, B. (2012). Religious participation among the older persons in Malaysia. / Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, / 6(3), 388-91.
  75. Zeldin, S., Christens, B. D., & Powers, J. L. (2013). The psychology and practice of youth-adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. / American Journal of Community Psychology, / 51(3-), 385-97. CrossRef
  76. Zeldin, S. (2004). Youth as agents of adult and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. / Applied Developmental Science, / 8(2), 75-0.
  77. Zeldin, S., Larson, R., Camino, L., & O’Connor, C. (2005). Intergenerational relationships and partnerships in community programs: Purpose, practice, and directions for research. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 33(1), 1-0. CrossRef
  78. Zeldin, S., Petrokubi, J., & MacNeil, C. (2008). Youth-Adult partnerships in decision making: Disseminating and implementing an innovative idea into established organizations and communities. / American Journal of Community Psychology, / 41, 262-77. CrossRef
  79. Zeldin, S., & Price, L. A. (1995). Creating supportive communities for adolescent development: Challenges to scholars—An introduction. / Journal of Adolescent Research, / 10(1), 6-4. CrossRef
  80. Zimmerman, M. A., Ramirez-Valles, J., & Maton, K. I. (1999). Resilience among urban African American male adolescents: A study of the protective effects of sociopolitical control on their mental health. / American Journal of Community Psychology, / 27, 733-51. CrossRef
  81. Zimmerman, M. A., & Zahniser, J. H. (1991). Refinements of sphere-specific measures of perceived control: Development of a sociopolitical control scale. / Journal of Community Psychology, / 19(1), 189-04. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Steven Eric Krauss (1)
  Jessica Collura (2)
  Shepherd Zeldin (2)
  Adriana Ortega (1)
  Haslinda Abdullah (1)
  Abdul Hadi Sulaiman (1)
  
  1. Institute for Social Science Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  2. School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1300 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
  
• ISSN：1573-6601

文摘

Youth–adult partnership (Y–AP) has emerged as a key practice for enacting two features of effective developmental settings: supportive adult relationships and support for efficacy and mattering. Previous studies have shown that when youth, supported by adults, actively participate in organizational and community decision-making they are likely to show greater confidence and agency, empowerment and critical consciousness, and community connections. Most of the extant research on Y–AP is limited to qualitative studies and the identification of organizational best practices. Almost all research focuses on Western sociocultural settings. To address these gaps, 299 youth, age 15 to 24, were sampled from established afterschool and community programs in Malaysia to explore the contribution of Y–AP (operationalized as having two components: youth voice in decision-making and supportive adult relationships) to empowerment, agency and community connections. As hypothesized, hierarchical regressions indicated that program quality (Y–AP, safe environment and program engagement) contributed to agency, empowerment and community connections beyond the contribution of family, school and religion. Additionally, the Y–AP measures contributed substantially more variance than the other measures of program quality on each outcome. Interaction effects indicated differences by age for empowerment and agency but not for community connections. The primary findings in this inquiry replicate those found in previous interview and observational-oriented studies. The data suggests fertile ground for future research while demonstrating that Y–AP may be an effective practice for positive youth development outside of Western settings.