Differences in leaf nitrogen content, photosynthesis, and resource-use efficiency between Eichhornia crassipes and a native plant Monochoria vaginalis in response to altered sediment nutrient levels
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Shufeng Fan (1)
Chunhua Liu (1)
Dan Yu (1)
Dong Xie (1) - 关键词：Biological invasion ; Water hyacinth ; Photosynthesis ; Resource ; use efficiency ; Fluctuating resources hypothesis
- 刊名：Hydrobiologia
- 出版年：2013
- 出版时间：July 2013
- 年：2013
- 卷：711
- 期：1
- 页码：129-137
- 全文大小：292KB
- 参考文献：1. Abbsi, S. A. & P. C. Nipaney, 1986. Infestation by aquatic weeds of the fern genus / Salvinia: its status and control. Environmental Conservation 13: 235鈥?41. CrossRef
2. Baruch, Z. & G. Goldstein, 1999. Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii. Oecologia 121: 183鈥?92. CrossRef
3. Bloom, A. J., F. S. Chapin III & H. A. Mooney, 1985. Resource limitation in plants鈥攁n economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 363鈥?92.
4. Burns, J. H., 2004. A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers ( / Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Diversity and Distributions 10: 387鈥?97. CrossRef
5. Chapin III, F. S., 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 233鈥?60. CrossRef
6. Cohen, A. N. & J. T. Carlton, 1998. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly Invaded estuary. Science 279: 555鈥?58. CrossRef
7. D鈥橝ntonio, C. M. & S. Kark, 2002. Impacts and extent of biotic invasions in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 202鈥?04. CrossRef
8. Daehler, C. C., 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 183鈥?11. CrossRef
9. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime & K. Thompson, 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528鈥?34. CrossRef
10. Dukes, J. S. & H. A. Mooney, 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 135鈥?39. CrossRef
11. Durand, Z. L. & G. Goldstein, 2001. Photosynthesis, photoinhibition, and nitrogen use efficiency in native and invasive tree ferns in Hawaii. Oecologia 126: 345鈥?54. CrossRef
12. Evans, J. R., 1989. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78: 9鈥?9. CrossRef
13. Feng, Y. L., 2008. Photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation and specific leaf area in invasive / Eupatorium adenophorum and native / Eupatorium japonicum grown at different irradiances. Physiologia Plantarum 133: 318鈥?26. CrossRef
14. Feng, Y. L. & G. L. Fu, 2008. Nitrogen allocation, partitioning and use efficiency in three invasive plant species in comparison with their native congeners. Biological Invasions 10: 891鈥?02. CrossRef
15. Feng, Y. L., H. Auge & S. K. Ebeling, 2007. Invasive / Buddleja davidii allocates more nitrogen to its photosynthetic machinery than five native woody species. Oecologia 153: 501鈥?10. CrossRef
16. Feng, Y. L., G. L. Fu & Y. L. Zheng, 2008. Specific leaf area relates to the differences in leaf construction cost, photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation, and use efficiencies between invasive and noninvasive alien congeners. Planta 228: 383鈥?90. CrossRef
17. Feng, Y. L., Y. B. Lei, R. F. Wang, R. M. Callaway, A. Valiente-Banuet, Y. P. Li Inderjit & Y. L. Zheng, 2009. Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 1853鈥?856. CrossRef
18. Funk, J. L. & P. M. Vitousek, 2007. Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446: 1079鈥?081. CrossRef
19. Garcia-Serrano, H., J. Escarre, E. Garnier & F. X. Sans, 2005. A comparative growth analysis between alien invader and native Senecio species with distinct distribution ranges. Ecoscience 12: 35鈥?3. CrossRef
20. Grotkopp, E. & M. Rejm谩nek, 2007. High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 94: 526鈥?32. CrossRef
21. Grotkopp, E., M. Rejm谩nek & T. L. Rost, 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. The American Naturalist 159: 396鈥?19. CrossRef
22. Howard, G. W. & K. L. S. Harley, 1998. How do floating aquatic weeds affect wetland conservation and development? How can these effects be minimised? Wetlands Ecology and Management 5: 215鈥?25. CrossRef
23. Hulme, P. E., 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 10鈥?8. CrossRef
24. Juliano, S. A. & L. P. Lounibos, 2005. Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health. Ecological Letters 8: 558鈥?74. CrossRef
25. Leishman, M. R., T. Haslehurst, A. Ares & Z. Baruch, 2007. Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: community- and global-scale comparisons. New Phytologist 176: 635鈥?43. CrossRef
26. Lowe S., M. Browne, S. Boudjelas, & M. De Poorter (2000). 100 of the World鈥檚 Worst Invasive Alien. Species A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN): 12聽pp.
27. Matzek, V., 2011. Superior performance and nutrient-use efficiency of invasive plants over non-invasive congeners in a resource-limited environment. Biological Invasions 13: 3005鈥?014. CrossRef
28. McAllister, C. A., A. K. Knapp & L. A. Maragni, 1998. Is leaf-level photosynthesis related to plant success in a highly productive grassland? Oecologia 117: 40鈥?6. CrossRef
29. McDowell, S. C. L., 2002. Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of / Rubus (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1431鈥?438. CrossRef
30. Niinemets, 脺., F. Valladares & R. Ceulemans, 2003. Leaf-level phenotypic variability and plasticity of invasive / Rhododendron / ponticum and non-invasive / Ilex aquifolium co-occurring at two contrasting European sites. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 941鈥?56. CrossRef
31. Njambuya, J. & L. Triest, 2010. Comparative performance of invasive alien / Eichhornia crassipes and native / Ludwigia stolonifera under non-limiting nutrient conditions in Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 656: 221鈥?31. CrossRef
32. Ogutu-Ohwayo, R., R. E. Hecky, A. S. Cohen & L. Kaufman, 1997. Human impacts on the African Great Lakes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 50: 117鈥?31. CrossRef
33. Osunkoya, O. O., D. Bayliss, F. D. Panetta & G. Vivian-Smith, 2010. Leaf trait co-ordination in relation to construction cost, carbon gain and resource-use efficiency in exotic invasive and native woody vine species. Annals of Botany 106: 371鈥?80. CrossRef
34. Pan, X., Y. Geng, W. Zhang, B. Li & J. Chen, 2006. The influence of abiotic stress and phenotypic plasticity on the distribution of invasive / Alternanthera philoxeroides along a riparian zone. Acta Oecologica 30: 333鈥?41. CrossRef
35. Parker, J. D. & M. E. Hay, 2005. Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecology Letters 8: 959鈥?96. CrossRef
36. Pattison, R. R., G. Goldstein & A. Ares, 1998. Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rainforest species. Oecologia 117: 449鈥?59. CrossRef
37. Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga & D. Morrison, 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273鈥?88. CrossRef
38. Poorter, H. & J. R. Evans, 1998. Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area. Oecologia 116: 26鈥?7. CrossRef
39. Shipley, B., 2006. Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A eta-analysis. Functional Ecology 20: 565鈥?74. CrossRef
40. Svil脿, M., J. L. Espinar, M. Hejda, P. E. Hulme, V. Jaro拧铆k, J. L. Maron, J. Pergl, U. Schaffner, Y. Sun & P. Py拧ek, 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecological Letters 14: 702鈥?08. CrossRef
41. Villamagna, A. M. & B. R. Murphy, 2010. Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth ( / Eichhornia / crassipes): a review. Freshwater Biology 55: 282鈥?98. CrossRef
42. Vitousek, P. M., 1986. Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? Ecological Studies 58: 163鈥?76. CrossRef
43. Vitousek, P. M., 1990. Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57: 7鈥?3. CrossRef
44. Xie, Y. H. (2003). Studies on the Nutrient Ecology of Water Hyacinth ( / Eichhornia crassipes), an Exotic Invasive Species. Ph.D. thesis, Wuhan University (in Chinese with English abstract).
45. Xie, Y. H. & D. Yu, 2003. The significance of lateral roots in phosphorus (P) acquisition of water hyacinth ( / Eichhornia crassipes). Aquatic Botany 75: 311鈥?21. CrossRef
46. Xie, Y. H., M. Z. Wen, D. Yu & Y. k. Li, 2004. Growth and resource allocation of water hyacinth as affected by gradually increasing nutrient concentrations. Aquatic Botany 79: 257鈥?66. CrossRef
47. Xie, D., D. Yu, L. F. Yu & C. H. Liu, 2010. Asexual propagations of introduced exotic macrophytes / Elodea nuttallii, / Myriophyllum aquaticum, and / M. propinquum are improved by nutrient-rich sediments in China. Hydrobiologia 655: 37鈥?7. CrossRef
48. Xiong, W., D. Yu, Q. Wang, C. H. Liu & L. G. Wang, 2008. A snail prefers native over exotic freshwater plants: implications for the enemy release hypotheses. Freshwater Biology 53: 2256鈥?263. - 作者单位：Shufeng Fan (1)
Chunhua Liu (1)
Dan Yu (1)
Dong Xie (1)
1. The National Field Station of Freshwater Ecosystem of Liangzi Lake, College of Life Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, People鈥檚 Republic of China - ISSN：1573-5117
文摘
Eichhornia crassipes is one of the world鈥檚 most prevalent invasive aquatic plants, causing significant ecological and socio-economic impacts in introduced areas. In this study, we compared the leaf resource capture- and use-related traits of E.聽crassipes with its confamilial native aquatic plant Monochoria vaginalis at three nutrient levels. Our results showed that leaf nitrogen content based on mass, leaf nitrogen content based on area, N:C, photosynthetic rate, specific leaf area, and leaf construction cost of E. crassipes increased significantly with increasing levels of nutrition, the mean values of these traits increased 0.55, 0.35, 0.51, 0.43, 0.21, and 0.07 times from low nutrient level to high, respectively. These traits (except for the leaf construction cost) in M. vaginalis remained unchanged. At low nutrient level, M. vaginalis had a higher leaf nitrogen content, N:C, photosynthetic rate, specific leaf area, and water-use efficiency than E. crassipes. At high nutrient level, E.聽crassipes had a higher photosynthetic rate and photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency than M. vaginalis, suggesting that the invasiveness of E. crassipes was dependent on the availability of resources in environment. In addition, our results supported the fluctuating resources hypothesis, indicating that an increased level of nutrients in the environment will increase the invasiveness of E. crassipes.