Modelling environmental and cognitive factors to predict performance in a stressful training scenario on a naval ship simulator

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Iris Cohen ; Willem-Paul Brinkman ; Mark A. Neerincx
• 关键词：Stress ; Virtual training ; Cognitive errors ; Performance ; Simulator ; Navy
• 刊名：Cognition, Technology & Work
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：November 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：17
• 期：4
• 页码：503-519
• 全文大小：777 KB
• 参考文献：Beach LR, Lipshitz R (1993) Why classical decision theory is an inappropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, pp 3-0
  Bosse T, Both F, Lambalgen Rv, Treur J (2008) An agent model for a human’s functional state and performance. In: International Agent Technology, Sydney. IEEE, pp 302-07
  Bouchard S, Bernier F, Boivin E, Morin B, Robillard G (2012) Using biofeedback while immersed in a stressful videogame increases the effectiveness of stress management skills in soldiers. PLoS ONE 7(4):e36169CrossRef
  Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1994) Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavioural therapy and experimental psychiatry 25(1):49-9CrossRef
  Cohen MS (1993) The bottom line: naturalistic decision aiding. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, pp 3-0
  Cohen I, Brinkman W-P, Neerincx MA (2012) Assembling a synthetic emotion mediator for quick decision making during acute stress. In: Proceedings of the 2012 European conference on cognitive ergonomics. ACM, Edinburgh
  Delahaij R (2009) Coping under acute stress: the role of person characteristics. Kon. Broese & Peereboom, Breda
  Dowell J, Hoc J-M (1995) Coordination in emergency operations and the tabletop training exercise. Le Travail Humain 58(1):85-02
  Driskell JE, Johnston JH (1998) Stress exposure training. In: Cannon-Browers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decision under stress: implications for individual and team training, vol 3., American Psychological AssociationWashington, DC, pp 191-18CrossRef
  Driskell JE, Johnston JH (2006) Stress exposure training. In: Cannon-Browers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress, vol 3. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
  Forgas JP (1995) Mood and judgement: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychol Bull 117(1):39-6CrossRef
  Gaillard A (2007) Stress productiviteit en gezondheid, vol 3. Holland Graphics, Amsterdam
  Gohm CL, Baumann MR, Sniezek JA (2001) Personality in extreme situations: thinking (or not) under acute stress. J Res Pers 35:388-99CrossRef
  Haag A, Goronzy S, Schaich P, Williams J (2004) Emotion recognition using bio-sensors: first steps towards an automatic system. Affective dialogue systems, tutorial and research workshop. Kloster Irsee, Germany
  Hartanto D, Kang N, Brinkman W-P, Kampmann IL, Morina N, Emmelkamp PMG, Neerincx MA (2012) Automatic mechanisms for measuring subjective unit of discomfort. Annu Rev Cybertherapy Telemed 181:192-96
  Hill SG, Iavecchia HP, Byers JC, Bittner AC, Zaklad AL, Christ RE (1992) Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales. Hum Factors 34(4):429-39
  Hjortskov N, Rissen D, Blangsted AK, Fallentin N, Lundberg U, S?gaard K (2004) The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work. Eur J Appl Physiol 92:84-9CrossRef
  Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis group, Boca RatonCrossRef
  Keinan G, Friedland N, Ben-Porath Y (1987) Decision making under stress: scanning of alternatives under physical threat. Acta Psychol 64:219-28CrossRef
  Kerstholt JH (1994) The effect of time pressure on decision-making behaviour in a dynamic task environment. Acta Psychol 86:89-04CrossRef
  Kleider HM, Parrott DJ, King TZ (2010) Shooting behaviour: How working memory and negative emotionality influence police officer shoot decisions. Appl Cogn Psychol 24:707-17CrossRef
  Kontogiannis T, Kossiavelou Z (1999) Stress and team performance: principles and challenges for intelligent decision aids. Saf Sci 33:103-28CrossRef
  Krantz G, Forsman M, Lundberg U (2004) Consistency in physiological stress responses and electromyographic activity during induced stress exposure in women and men. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 2:105-18CrossRef
  Kumar R, Indrayan A (2011) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatr 48:277-87CrossRef
  Kylesten B (2013) Dynamic decision-making on an operative level: a model including preconditions and working method. Cogn Technol Work 15:197-05CrossRef
  Lazarus RS (1999) Stress and emotion: a new synthesis. Springer, New York
  Maule AJ, Hockey GRJ, Bdzola L (2000) Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information procession strategy. Acta Psychol 104:283-01CrossRef
  Mehrabian A (1996) Pleasure–arousal-dominance: a general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Curr Psychol 14(4):261-92MathSciNet CrossRef
  Mendl M (1999) Performing under pressure: stress and cognitive function. Appl Anim Behav Sci 65:221
• 作者单位：Iris Cohen (1) (2)
  Willem-Paul Brinkman (2)
  Mark A. Neerincx (1) (2)
  
  1. TNO, P.O. Box 23, 3769 ZG, Soesterberg, The Netherlands
  2. Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
  
• 刊物类别：Computer Science
• 刊物主题：User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction
  Computing Methodologies
  
• 出版者：Springer London
• ISSN：1435-5566

文摘

Professionals working in risky or emergency situations have to make very accurate decisions, while the quality of the decisions might be affected by the stress that these situations bring about. Integrating task feedback and biofeedback into computer-based training environments could improve trainees-stress-coping behaviour. This paper presents and assesses a refined version of the cognitive performance and error (COPE) model that describes the effects of stressful events on decisions as a foundation for such a support tool. Within a high-fidelity simulator of a ship’s bridge at the Royal Netherlands Naval College, students of the naval college (n = 10) were observed while completing a 2-h-long shadowing and boarding operation combined with a search-and-rescue operation. For every action, variables were measured: objective and subjective task demand, challenge and threat appraisal, and arousal based on heart rate and heart rate variability. The data supported the COPE model and were used to create predictive models. The variables could provide minute-by-minute predictions of performance that can be divided into performance rated by experts and errors. The predictions for performance rated by experts correlated with the observed data (r = 0.77), and 68.3 % of the predicted errors were correct. The error predictions concern the chances of making specific errors of communication, planning, speed, and task allocation. These models will be implemented into a real-time feedback system for trainees performing in stressful simulated training tasks. Keywords Stress Virtual training Cognitive errors Performance Simulator Navy