Extensive occupational finger use delays age effects in tactileperception—an ERP study
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Eva-Maria Reuter (1)
Claudia Voelcker-Rehage (1) (2)
Solveig Vieluf (1)
Axel H. Winneke (1) (2)
Ben Godde (1) (2) - 关键词：Touch perception ; Somatosensory perception ; Aging ; Expertise ; Plasticity
- 刊名：Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：May 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：76
- 期：4
- 页码：1160-1175
- 全文大小：
- 参考文献：1. Adler, G., & Nacimiento, A. (1988). Age-dependent changes of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in healthy adults. / Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 51(1), 55-9. doi:10.1159/000099383 CrossRef
2. Adrover-Roig, D., & Barceló, F. (2010). Individual differences in aging and cognitive control modulate the neural indexes of context updating and maintenance during task switching. / Cortex, 46(4), 434-50. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.09.012 CrossRef
3. Allison, T., McCarthy, G., Wood, C. C., & Jones, S. J. (1991). Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve. / Brain, 114(6), 2465-503. doi:10.1093/brain/114.6.2465 CrossRef
4. Baumann, S., Meyer, M., & J?ncke, L. (2008). Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention. / Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(12), 2238-249. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20157 CrossRef
5. Bolton, D. A. E., & Staines, W. R. (2012). Age-related loss in attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing. / Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1502-513. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.002 CrossRef
6. Bowden, J. L., & McNulty, P. A. (2013). The magnitude and rate of reduction in strength, dexterity and sensation in the human hand vary with ageing. / Experimental Gerontology. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2013.03.011
7. Cohen, J., & Polich, J. (1997). On the number of trials needed for P300. / International Journal of Psychophysiology, 25(3), 249-55. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(96)00743-X CrossRef
8. Cona, G., Arcara, G., Amodio, P., Schiff, S., & Bisiacchi, P. S. (2013). Does executive control really play a crucial role in explaining age-related cognitive and neural differences? / Neuropsychology, 27(3), 378. CrossRef
9. Curran, T., Gibson, L., Horne, J. H., Young, B., & Bozell, A. P. (2009). Expert image analysts show enhanced visual processing in change detection. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 390-97. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.390 CrossRef
10. Daffner, K. R., Chong, H., Sun, X., Tarbi, E. C., Riis, J. L., McGinnis, S. M., & Holcomb, P. J. (2011). Mechanisms underlying age-and performance-related differences in working memory. / Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(6), 1298-314. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21540 CrossRef
11. Deshpande, N., Metter, E. J., Ling, S., Conwit, R., & Ferrucci, L. (2008). Physiological correlates of age-related decline in vibrotactile sensitivity. / Neurobiology of Aging, 29(5), 765-73. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.12.002 CrossRef
12. Desmedt, J. E., & Cheron, G. (1980). Somatosensory evoked potentials to finger stimulation in healthy octogenarians and in young adults: Wave forms, scalp topography and transit times of pariental and frontal components. / Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 50(5-), 404-25. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(80)90007-3 CrossRef
13. Dinse, H. R. (2006). Cortical reorganization in the aging brain. / Progress in Brain Research, 157, 57-0. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)57005-0 CrossRef
14. Drechsler, F. (1978). Quantitative analysis of neurophysiological processes of the aging CNS. / Journal of Neurology, 218(3), 197-13. doi:10.1007/BF00313013 CrossRef
15. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., & Taub, E. (1995). Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. / Science, 270(5234), 305-07. doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.305 CrossRef
16. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). / Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Coles, M. G. H. (2000). Event-related brain potentials. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), / Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 53-4). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Fjell, A. M., & Walhovd, K. B. (2001). P300 and neuropsychological tests as measures of aging: Scalp topography and cognitive changes. / Brain Topography, 14(1), 25-0. doi:10.1023/A:1012563605837 CrossRef
19. Friedman, D. (2012). The components of aging. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), / Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 513-36). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20. Friedman, D., Kazmerski, V., & Fabiani, M. (1997). An overview of age-related changes in the scalp distribution of P3b. / Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 104(6), 498-13. doi:10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00036-1 CrossRef
21. Friedman, D., Simpson, G., & Hamberger, M. (1993). Age‐related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. / Psychophysiology, 30(4), 383-96. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02060.x CrossRef
22. Frings, C., Amendt, A., & Spence, C. (2011). When seeing doesn’t matter: Assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(4), 1174. doi:10.1037/a0022336
23. Gaál, Z. A., Csuhaj, R., & Molnár, M. (2007). Age-dependent changes of auditory evoked potentials–effect of task difficulty. / Biological Psychology, 76(3), 196-08. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.07.009 CrossRef
24. Giriyappa, D., Subrahmanyam, R. M., Rangashetty, S., & Sharma, R. (2009). Index finger somatosensory evoked potentials in blind braille readers. / Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska, 43(5), 439-45.
25. Godde, B., Ehrhardt, J., & Braun, C. (2003). Behavioral significance of input-dependent plasticity of human somatosensory cortex. / Neuroreport, 14(4), 543-46. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000060833.03650.f7 CrossRef
26. Goldreich, D., & Kanics, I. M. (2003). Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. / The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(8), 3439-445.
27. Goldreich, D., & Kanics, I. M. (2006). Performance of blind and sighted humans on a tactile grating detection task. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 68(8), 1363-371. doi:10.3758/BF03193735 CrossRef
28. H?m?l?inen, H., Kekoni, J., Sams, M., Reinikainen, K., & N??t?nen, R. (1990). Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: Contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to P50 and P100 components. / Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75(1-), 13-1. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(90)90148-D CrossRef
29. Harris, J. A., Arabzadeh, E., Fairhall, A. L., Benito, C., & Diamond, M. E. (2006). Factors affecting frequency discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli: Implications for cortical encoding. / PLoS One, 1, e100. CrossRef
30. Hilsenrat, M., & Reiner, M. (2010). Discrimination capabilities of professionals in manual skills in a haptic task not related to their expertise. In A. M. L. Kappers, J. B. F. van Erp, W. M. Bergmann Tiest & Van Der Helm, Frans CT. (Eds.), / Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations, International conference, EuroHaptics 2010, Amsterdam July 2010, Proceedings Part II (pp. 31-6). Amsterdam: Springer.
31. Hodzic, A., Veit, R., Karim, A. A., Erb, M., & Godde, B. (2004). Improvement and decline in tactile discrimination behavior after cortical plasticity induced by passive tactile coactivation. / The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(2), 442-46. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3731-03.2004 CrossRef
32. H?ffken, O., Veit, M., Knossalla, F., Lissek, S., Bliem, B., Ragert, P., & Tegenthoff, M. (2007). Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by tactile coactivation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans correlates with perceptual gain. / The Journal of Physiology, 584(2), 463-71. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.140079 CrossRef
33. Hollins, M. (2002). Touch and haptics. In H. E. Pashler (Ed.), / Stevens-handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
34. Horton, S., Baker, J., & Schorer, J. (2008). Expertise and aging: Maintaining skills through the lifespan. / European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 5(2), 89-6. doi:10.1007/s11556-008-0034-5 CrossRef
35. Iwadate, M., Mori, A., Ashizuka, T., Takayose, M., & Ozawa, T. (2005). Long-term physical exercise and somatosensory event-related potentials. / Experimental Brain Research, 160(4), 528-32. CrossRef
36. James, C. E., Michel, C. M., Britz, J., Vuilleumier, P., & Hauert, C. A. (2011). Rhythm evokes action: Early processing of metric deviances in expressive music by experts and laymen revealed by ERP source imaging. / Human Brain Mapping, 33(12), 2751-767. doi:10.1002/hbm.21397 CrossRef
37. J?ncke, L., Schlaug, G., & Steinmetz, H. (1997). Hand skill asymmetry in professional musicians. / Brain and Cognition, 34(3), 424-32. doi:10.1006/brcg.1997.0922 CrossRef
38. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. / Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10(2), 371-75.
39. Kaneko, A., Asai, N., & Kanda, T. (2005). The influence of age on pressure perception of static and moving two-point discrimination in normal subjects. / Journal of Hand Therapy, 18(4), 421-24. doi:10.1197/j.jht.2005.09.010 . quiz 425. CrossRef
40. Kennedy, Q., Taylor, J. L., Reade, G., & Yesavage, J. A. (2010). Age and expertise effects in aviation decision making and flight control in a flight simulator. / Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 81(5), 489. CrossRef
41. Kida, T., Kaneda, T., & Nishihira, Y. (2012). Dual-task repetition alters event-related brain potentials and task performance. / Clinical Neurophysiology, 123, 1123-130. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.001 CrossRef
42. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. / Psychophysiology, 38(3), 557-77. doi:10.1017/S0048577201990559 CrossRef
43. Krampe, R. T., & Charness, N. (2006). Aging and expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffmann (Eds.), / The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 723-742; 40). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. / Science, 197(4305), 792-95. doi:10.1126/science.887923 CrossRef
45. Legge, G. E., Madison, C., Vaughn, B. N., Cheong, A. M., & Miller, J. C. (2008). Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 70(8), 1471-488. doi:10.3758/PP.70.8.1471 CrossRef
46. Lenz, M., Tegenthoff, M., Kohlhaas, K., Stude, P., H?ffken, O., Gatica Tossi, M. A., & Dinse, H. R. (2012). Increased excitability of somatosensory cortex in aged humans is associated with impaired tactile acuity. / The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(5), 1811-816. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2722-11.2012 CrossRef
47. Li Hegner, Y., Lee, Y., Grodd, W., & Braun, C. (2010). Comparing tactile pattern and vibrotactile frequency discrimination: A human FMRI study. / Journal of Neurophysiology, 103(6), 3115-122. doi:10.1152/jn.00940.2009 CrossRef
48. Manning, H., & Tremblay, F. (2006). Age differences in tactile pattern recognition at the fingertip. / Somatosensory & Motor Research, 23(3-), 147-55. doi:10.1080/08990220601093460 CrossRef
49. Master, S., Larue, M., & Tremblay, F. (2010). Characterization of human tactile pattern recognition performance at different ages. / Somatosensory & Motor Research, 27(2), 60-7. doi:10.3109/08990220.2010.485959 CrossRef
50. McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. / Science, 211(4477), 77-0. doi:10.1126/science.7444452 CrossRef
51. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. / Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-13. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 CrossRef
52. Overall, J. E., & Spiegel, D. K. (1969). Concerning least squares analysis of experimental data. / Psychological Bulletin, 72(5), 311-22.
53. Pascual-Leone, A., & Torres, F. (1993). Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in braille readers. / Brain, 116(1), 39-2. doi:10.1093/brain/116.1.39 CrossRef
54. Pellicciari, M., Miniussi, C., Rossini, P., & De Gennaro, L. (2009). Increased cortical plasticity in the elderly: Changes in the somatosensory cortex after paired associative stimulation. / Neuroscience, 163(1), 266-76. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.06.013 CrossRef
55. Peters, A. (2002). The effects of normal aging on myelin and nerve fibers: A review. / Journal of Neurocytology, 31(8-), 581-93. CrossRef
56. Polich, J. (1996). Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies. / Psychophysiology, 33(4), 334-53. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01058.x CrossRef
57. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. / Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128-148. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 CrossRef
58. Polich, J. (1987). Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. / Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 68(4), 311-20. CrossRef
59. Polich, J. (2012). In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), / Neuropsychology of P300 (pp. 159-88). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60. Pontifex, M. B., Hillman, C. H., & Polich, J. (2009). Age, physical fitness, and attention: P3a and P3b. / Psychophysiology, 46(2), 379-87. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00782.x CrossRef
61. Radlo, S. J., Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., & Frehlich, S. G. (2001). Perceptual decision making for baseball pitch recognition: Using P300 latency and amplitude to index attentional processing. / Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72(1), 22-1. CrossRef
62. Ragert, P., Franzkowiak, S., Schwenkreis, P., Tegenthoff, M., & Dinse, H. R. (2008). Improvement of tactile perception and enhancement of cortical excitability through intermittent theta burst rTMS over human primary somatosensory cortex. / Experimental Brain Research, 184(1), 1-1. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1122-x
63. Ragert, P., Schmidt, A., Altenmüller, E., & Dinse, H. R. (2004). Superior tactile performance and learning in professional pianists: Evidence for meta-plasticity in musicians. / European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(2), 473-78. doi:10.1111/j.0953-816X.2003.03142.x CrossRef
64. Reuter, E., Voelcker-Rehage, C., Vieluf, S., & Godde, B. (2012). Touch perception throughout working life: Effects of age and expertise. / Experimental Brain Research, 216(2), 287-97. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2931-5 CrossRef
65. Reuter, E., Voelcker-Rehage, C., Vieluf, S., Winneke, A. H., & Godde, B. (2013). A parietal-to-frontal shift in the P300 is associated with compensation of tactile discrimination deficits in late middle-aged adults. / Psychophysiology, 50(6), 583-93. doi:10.1111/psyp.12037 CrossRef
66. Riis, J. L., Chong, H., McGinnnis, S., Tarbi, E., Sun, X., Holcomb, P. J., & Daffner, K. R. (2009). Age-related changes in early novelty processing as measured by ERPs. / Biological Psychology, 82(1), 33-4. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.05.003 CrossRef
67. Sailer, U., Fischmeister, F. P. S., & Bauer, H. (2010). Effects of learning on feedback-related brain potentials in a decision-making task. / Brain Research, 1342, 85-3. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.051 CrossRef
68. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. / Psychological Review, 103(3), 403. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403 CrossRef
69. Schubert, R., Blankenburg, F., Lemm, S., Villringer, A., & Curio, G. (2006). Now you feel it—now you don’t: ERP correlates of somatosensory awareness. / Psychophysiology, 43(1), 31-0. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00379.x CrossRef
70. Schubert, R., Ritter, P., Wüstenberg, T., Preuschhof, C., Curio, G., Sommer, W., & Villringer, A. (2008). Spatial attention related SEP amplitude modulations covary with BOLD signal in S1—a simultaneous EEG—fMRI study. / Cerebral Cortex, 18(11), 2686-700. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn029 CrossRef
71. Sepp?nen, M., Pesonen, A. K., & Tervaniemi, M. (2012). Music training enhances the rapid plasticity of P3a/P3b event-related brain potentials for unattended and attended target sounds. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(3), 600-12. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0257-9 CrossRef
72. Shahbazian, M., Bertrand, P., Abarca, M., & Jacobs, R. (2009). Occupational changes in manual tactile sensibility of the dentist. / Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 36(12), 880-86. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02014 CrossRef
73. Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. / Behavior Research Methods, 31(1), 137-49. doi:10.3758/BF03207704 CrossRef
74. Stephen, J. M., Monta?o, R., Donahue, C. H., Adair, J. C., Knoefel, J., Qualls, C., & Aine, C. J. (2010). Somatosensory responses in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and alzheimer’s disease. / Journal of Neural Transmission, 117(2), 217-25. doi:10.1007/s00702-009-0343-5 CrossRef
75. Stephen, J. M., Ranken, D., Best, E., Adair, J., Knoefel, J., Kovacevic, S., & Aine, C. J. (2006). Aging changes and gender differences in response to median nerve stimulation measured with MEG. / Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(1), 131-43. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.09.003 CrossRef
76. Stevens, J. C., Foulke, E., & Patterson, M. (1996). Tactile acuity, aging, and braille reading in long-term blindness. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 91-06. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.2.2.91
77. Tanaka, E., Inui, K., Kida, T., Miyazaki, T., Takeshima, Y., & Kakigi, R. (2008). A transition from unimodal to multimodal activations in four sensory modalities in humans: An electrophysiological study. / BMC Neuroscience, 9(1), 116. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-116 CrossRef
78. Tervaniemi, M., Just, V., Koelsch, S., Widmann, A., & Schr?ger, E. (2005). Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: An event-related potential and behavioral study. / Experimental Brain Research, 161(1), 1-0. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2044-5 CrossRef
79. Tremblay, F., Mireault, A. C., Létourneau, J., Pierrat, A., & Bourrassa, S. (2002). Tactile perception and manual dexterity in computer users. / Somatosensory & Motor Research, 19(2), 101-08. doi:10.1080/08990220120113066 CrossRef
80. Tremblay, F., Wong, K., Sanderson, R., & Cote, L. (2003). Tactile spatial acuity in elderly persons: Assessment with grating domes and relationship with manual dexterity. / Somatosensory & Motor Research, 20(2), 127-32. doi:10.1080/0899022031000105154 CrossRef
81. Van Boven, R. W., Hamilton, R. H., Kauffman, T., Keenan, J. P., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Tactile spatial resolution in blind braille readers. / Neurology, 54(12), 2230-236. doi:10.1212/WNL.54.12.2230 CrossRef
82. Vieluf, S., Godde, B., Reuter, E., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2013). Effects of age and fine motor expertise on the bilateral deficit in force initiation. / Experimental Brain Research, 231(1), 107-16. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3673-3 CrossRef
83. Vieluf, S., Mahmoodi, J., Godde, B., Reuter, E., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2012). The influence of age and work-related expertise on fine motor control. / The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 25(4), 199-06. doi:10.1024/1662-9647/a000071 CrossRef
84. Voelcker-Rehage, C., & Godde, B. (2010). High frequency sensory stimulation improves tactile but not motor performance in older adults. / Motor Control, 14(4), 460-77.
85. Walhovd, K. B., Rosquist, H., & Fjell, A. M. (2008). P300 amplitude age reductions are not caused by latency jitter. / Psychophysiology, 45(4), 545-53. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00661.x CrossRef
86. West, R., Schwarb, H., & Johnson, B. N. (2010). The influence of age and individual differences in executive function on stimulus processing in the oddball task. / Cortex, 46(4), 550-63. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.001 CrossRef
87. Wickremaratchi, M. M., & Llewelyn, J. G. (2005). Effects of ageing on touch. / Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2006(82), 301-04. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.039651
88. Wong, M., Gnanakumaran, V., & Goldreich, D. (2011). Tactile spatial acuity enhancement in blindness: Evidence for experience-dependent mechanisms. / The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(19), 7028-037. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6461-10.2011 CrossRef - 作者单位：Eva-Maria Reuter (1)
Claudia Voelcker-Rehage (1) (2)
Solveig Vieluf (1)
Axel H. Winneke (1) (2)
Ben Godde (1) (2)
1. Jacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional Development, Jacobs Universtiy Bremen, Campus Ring 1, 28759, Bremen, Germany
2. AGEACT Research Center, Jacobs Universtiy Bremen, Bremen, Germany - ISSN：1943-393X
文摘
Tactile expertise, resulting from extensive use of hands, has previously been shown to improve tactile perception in blind people and musicians and to be associated with changes in the central processing of tactile information. This study investigated whether expertise, due to precise and deliberate use of the fingers at work, relates to improved tactile perception and whether this expertise interacts with age. A tactile pattern and a frequency discrimination task were conducted while ERPs were measured in experts and nonexperts of two age groups within middle adulthood. Independently of age, accuracy was better in experts than in nonexperts in both tasks. Somatosensory N70 amplitudes were larger with increasing age and for experts than for nonexperts. P100 amplitudes were smaller in experts than in nonexperts in the frequency discrimination task. In the pattern discrimination task, P300 difference wave amplitude was reduced in experts and late middle-aged adults. In the frequency discrimination task, P300 was more equally distributed in late middle-aged adults. We conclude that extensive, dexterous manual work leads to acquisition of tactile expertise and that this expertise might delay, but not counteract, age effects on tactile perception. Comparable neurophysiological changes induced by age and expertise presumably have different underlying mechanisms. Enlarged somatosensory N70 amplitudes might result from reduced inhibition in older adults but from enhanced, specific excitability of the somatosensory cortex in experts. Regarding P300, smaller amplitudes might indicate fewer available resources in older adults and, by contrast, a reduced need to engage as much cognitive effort to the task in experts.